Let me expand a bit on this -- and ask a question. You made two points about (i) the life of hardware and (ii) saving money. The question is about (i).I agree, this is an issue to keep in mind. However, I am talking about one single device (among the usual components of a home audio system) that is slow, which is a media server/streamer. All other devices I have can be switched on in practical terms immediately, and I do not keep them in a standby. As far as the power consumption in a standby for the media server/streamer is concerned, it is normally less than 1W in the deep standby and on a scale of a few watts (may be just 2W) in the network standby. This is definitely less than "several hundred a year" mentioned by you. By the way, as far as I know, in the EU, the power consumption for electronic devices in a standby mode in the field of "consumer electronics" sold in the EU has been limited by law for years now. From 2025, the rules are supposed to be even stricter; in particular, less than 0.5W in the deep standby mode.
Re (i). My general expectation is that the currents flowing in the standby mode through the powered part of the system at 1W of a total power consumption (which is a typical scale for the power consumption in the deep standby) are by far too small to noticeably affect the lifetime and performance of hardware (e.g., by generating heat at certain capacitors) in a HiFi device. I do not know numbers, but electrical engineers in this field definitely do. That said, I remember that when I bought a Rotel integrated some 30 years ago, it was emphasized in the instruction manual, and/or in accompanying paperwork, that the owner should better use the standby mode as this prolongs the life of the amplifier (in those days, companies could make scientifically provable or disprovable suggestions without being attacked by "climate savers"). My guess back then was that fast "cold starts" are detrimental to some of the hardware (power supply capacitors?), so that keeping the device in a standby mode when not in use was good for purely technical reasons (in addition to keeping the control circuit powered all the time, which is a matter of convenience only). So, unless it is hair-splitting, what is true: the standby mode beyond the matter of convenience is good for the life of HiFi hardware used on an everyday basis or the opposite?
Re (ii). I do not know where you live, but it is easy to find on the Web the cost of 1kWh for a private household essentially everywhere. Let us take Germany as the country where the cost of electricity in 2024 is one of the highest. Let it be 0.4€ for 1kWh in a private household as a characteristic scale. In that country, you will pay for a media server/streamer in the deep standby mode, where it draws 0.5W, 0.4x365x24x0.5/1000=1.75€ per year. If it consumes 2W in the network standby mode (WiFi connection is always on), you will pay 7€ per year. I do not find expenditures on this scale excessive for a really convenient thing. As for your suggestion to keep the DMP-A6 all the time on and pay more to avoid the "hardship," this is, in my view, simply not a sensible technical solution in the first place.
Last edited: