• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Event Opal

Available in Europe, in Poland, used, in very good condition, for approx. USD 2,000


I am no longer in a position to afford them lol.
 
I owned them a long while back. Definitely impressive low end / dynamics / SLAM, especially for the size. I always found something weird / fatiguing / annoying about the top end though. Maybe the distortion? I don't miss them at all but I know some people loved them.
 
I owned them a long while back. Definitely impressive low end / dynamics / SLAM, especially for the size. I always found something weird / fatiguing / annoying about the top end though. Maybe the distortion? I don't miss them at all but I know some people loved them.
Which tweeter did your Opals have? Mine were the beryllium-copper ones and they definitely had some brightness. It's possible you find metal dome tweeters fatiguing.

Agreed on the slam, you wouldn't think so considering their size but they can hit like a truck if called for it.
 
A urban rumor. Metal tweeters mostly don't sound any more bright than a silk or whatever tweeter. If they do it's because they have been tuned that way and not because they are metal.
Metal tweeters are prone to ringing and they can have IMD in the audible band due to severe breakup modes (which also have peaks in the FR). The most common criticism you find with metal tweeters is fatigue. I don't like them myself and prefer silk soft domes.
 
Metal tweeters are prone to ringing and they can have IMD in the audible band due to severe breakup modes (which also have peaks in the FR). The most common criticism you find with metal tweeters is fatigue. I don't like them myself and prefer silk soft domes.
Strange because ENERGY/Audio Products International a older leading developer of the famous Reference 22 tweeter used silk in a double cone bullet configuration to eliminate what you describe as being problematic with metal dome tweeters.
 
Metal tweeters are prone to ringing and they can have IMD in the audible band due to severe breakup modes (which also have peaks in the FR). The most common criticism you find with metal tweeters is fatigue. I don't like them myself and prefer silk soft domes.

Most metal domes have break up outside of the audible range, so it's not a problem. Soft dome tweeters can exhibit break up well, and they tend to have it within the audible range.

It's only a common criticism because just have no idea what they're talking about and jump to what they think makes sense. Doodski is correct in that a tweeters brightness largely comes down to the filtering of the driver, not it's diaphragm material.
 
Most metal domes have break up outside of the audible range, so it's not a problem.
Yes however that IMD from beyond the audible band can fold in the audible band which can be measured.

Soft dome tweeters can exhibit break up well, and they tend to have it within the audible range.

Sure but the breakups are much better damped and controlled with the use of doping

It's only a common criticism because just have no idea what they're talking about and jump to what they think makes sense. Doodski is correct in that a tweeters brightness largely comes down to the filtering of the driver, not it's diaphragm material.

The IMD, resonances and ringing are all things I find intolerable about metal domes over longterm use.
 
Yes however that IMD from beyond the audible band can fold in the audible band which can be measured.

Gonna need some proof. Looking at some speakers Erin reviewed with tweeters I know have breakup outside of audible range, I'm not seeing any IMD issues associated with the break up.
 
Metal tweeters are prone to ringing and they can have IMD in the audible band due to severe breakup modes (which also have peaks in the FR). The most common criticism you find with metal tweeters is fatigue. I don't like them myself and prefer silk soft domes.
See for yourself. Directivity is opening up somewhat in the upper frequencies which could cause some problems with reflections.

I still love mine. Got the later Al/Mg tweeter.
 
Last edited:
Strange because ENERGY/Audio Products International an older leading developer of the famous Reference 22 tweeter used silk in a double cone bullet configuration to eliminate what you describe as being problematic with metal dome tweeters.
Drivers composed of rigid materials with less internal damping / loss will usually exhibit more abrupt and significant breakup modes as they are pushed toward (or hopefully only past) the upper range of their design bandwidth. This happens with tweeters and woofers in similar ways. Metal and Kevlar for example, everything else being equal, have less inherent damping than paper, cloth or silk. The advantage however of ultra rigid and light materials, like beryllium, for tweeters is that the lowest frequency breakup mode can more easily be designed to begin far above the audio range. The Energy 22 “Hyperdome” tweeter as designed by Winslow Burhoe was made from impregnated cotton cloth giving it stiffness while still maintaining damping within the audio range. Burhoe himself has stated that his Hyperdome tweeter inconsequentially looses some linearity beyond the audio range as it continues to exhibit significant ultrasonic response. The Hyperdome design focus was apparently to create a tweeter with an unusually linear and broad range response to accommodate a 1.5k crossover, and minimize any resonances within its audio range.
 
Drivers composed of rigid materials with less internal damping / loss will usually exhibit more abrupt and significant breakup modes as they are pushed toward (or hopefully only past) the upper range of their design bandwidth. This happens with tweeters and woofers in similar ways. Metal and Kevlar for example, everything else being equal, have less inherent damping than paper, cloth or silk. The advantage however of ultra rigid and light materials, like beryllium, for tweeters is that the lowest frequency breakup mode can more easily be designed to begin far above the audio range. The Energy 22 “Hyperdome” tweeter as designed by Winslow Burhoe was made from impregnated cotton cloth giving it stiffness while still maintaining damping within the audio range. Burhoe himself has stated that his Hyperdome tweeter inconsequentially looses some linearity beyond the audio range as it continues to exhibit significant ultrasonic response. The Hyperdome design focus was apparently to create a tweeter with an unusually linear and broad range response to accommodate a 1.5k crossover, and minimize any resonances within its audio range.
Typo/autocorrect issue - the first sentence should read: "Drivers composed of rigid materials with less internal damping / loss will usually exhibit more abrupt and significant breakup modes as they are pushed toward (or hopefully not past) the upper range of their design bandwidth." Apparently my original post is no longer editable.
 
Back
Top Bottom