• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Ethernet Input DACs

svart-hvitt

Major Contributor
Joined
Aug 31, 2017
Messages
2,375
Likes
1,253
Correct. Cable run distance is 9m.

Apparently, the Google Chromecast Audio can be connected to Ethernet via a simple kit. I'll try that first and compare to wifi.

http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/archive/2418159 - see first post.

https://www.amazon.com.au/UGREEN-Network-Adapter-Chromecast-Ethernet/dp/B0773NKLTD

Regarding cable length:

Jenving’s Supra USB cables are of max 15 meters length. The USB cables are certified.
Would such a long USB cable suffice?

http://www.jenving.com/products/view/usb-2.0-a-b-blue-15m-1001907607
 

Fitzcaraldo215

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 4, 2016
Messages
1,440
Likes
634
Regarding cable length:

Jenving’s Supra USB cables are of max 15 meters length. The USB cables are certified.
Would such a long USB cable suffice?

http://www.jenving.com/products/view/usb-2.0-a-b-blue-15m-1001907607
Yes, there are also the Corning glass fiber USB 3.0 cables at 10 and 15 meters powered and 30 meters unpowered.

I tried a Corning 10 meter in my system vs. a modest 5 meter metallic USB. It worked fine, but it offered no sonic advantage I could hear.
 

svart-hvitt

Major Contributor
Joined
Aug 31, 2017
Messages
2,375
Likes
1,253
Yes, there are also the Corning glass fiber USB 3.0 cables at 10 and 15 meters powered and 30 meters unpowered.

I tried a Corning 10 meter in my system vs. a modest 5 meter metallic USB. It worked fine, but it offered no sonic advantage I could hear.

The Corning glass is interesting but it’s not certified USB protocol. Which may be a(n aesthtetic ?) problem for some. I believe the Corning connectors are full of circuitry.
 

Fitzcaraldo215

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 4, 2016
Messages
1,440
Likes
634
The Corning glass is interesting but it’s not certified USB protocol. Which may be a(n aesthtetic ?) problem for some. I believe the Corning connectors are full of circuitry.
I was incorrect earlier. All require self powered peripherals. And, they go up to 50 meters, although not inexpensively..

The only added circuitry, AFAIK and aside from the obvious electrical signal to/from optical conversion, is a builtin single port USB hub at the receiving end, making the connectors Type A to A. So, an A-B adaptor is normally required. The cable contains thin copper USB power leads for the hub, but they apparently restrict power to peripherals. However, the normal sensing of the USB peripheral connection still works.

https://www.corning.com/microsites/coc/ocbc/Documents/CNT-009-AEN.pdf
 

gvl

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 16, 2018
Messages
3,485
Likes
4,075
Location
SoCal
I don't see any reason for Ethernet to be better than wifi. It uses TCP/IP so the link level protocol should be transparent. The same bits are hitting the dac.

Do we know it's not using UDP?
 

gvl

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 16, 2018
Messages
3,485
Likes
4,075
Location
SoCal
Given there is a decent selection for USB over Ethernet solutions I'm not sure why would anyone try to use USB-only gizmos to increase cable reach for audio.
 

Fitzcaraldo215

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 4, 2016
Messages
1,440
Likes
634
Good luck getting audio over that length without massive glitches! :rolleyes:
A 10 meter Corning glass USB worked into my DAC with no glitches whatsoever.

A year or two ago, some Dutch guy in a CA Forum thread complained bitterly about his Exasound DAC delivering horrible, broken sound via USB. Exasound was unable to pinpoint the problem. They gave him a new, upgraded DAC, but his problem persisted. The problem could not be replicated on the old DAC back at Exasound. They were stumped.

After I posed some probing questions, it was revealed that someone had sold him a fancy 10 meter, metallic USB cable. I told him that was obviously out of spec. He tried a 10 meter Corning and the problem disappeared.
 

svart-hvitt

Major Contributor
Joined
Aug 31, 2017
Messages
2,375
Likes
1,253
Good luck getting audio over that length without massive glitches! :rolleyes:
This 15 m cable is made by Jenving, an audio oriented company in Sweden, making certified cables to specifications. If they say it works, it works.

Maybe @amirm should measure it...

;)
 

RayDunzl

Grand Contributor
Central Scrutinizer
Joined
Mar 9, 2016
Messages
13,250
Likes
17,182
Location
Riverview FL
Last edited:

Fitzcaraldo215

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 4, 2016
Messages
1,440
Likes
634
This 15 m cable is made by Jenving, an audio oriented company in Sweden, making certified cables to specifications. If they say it works, it works.

Maybe @amirm should measure it...

;)
I believe you and them to the point that it might be worth a try in some systems, with a money back guarantee of course.
 

Superdad

Active Member
Audio Company
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
149
Likes
91
This 15 m cable is made by Jenving, an audio oriented company in Sweden, making certified cables to specifications. If they say it works, it works.

USB 2.0 high-speed spec max is 5 meters! And isochronous asynchronous audio is even more sensitive than that. Jenving is a fine company, but they can't rewrite the spec or bend physics.

From the USB.org site:
"The cable length was limited by a cable delay spec of 26ns to allow for reflections to settle at the transmitter before the next bit was sent. Since USB uses source termination and voltage-mode drivers, this has to be the case, otherwise reflections can pile up and blow the driver. This does not mean the line voltage has fully settled by the end of the bit; with worst-case undertermination. However, there's been enough damping by the end of the bit that the reflection amplitude has been reduced to manageable levels. The low speed cable length was limited to 18ns to keep transmission line effects from impacting low speed signals."
 

Superdad

Active Member
Audio Company
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
149
Likes
91
A 10 meter Corning glass USB worked into my DAC with no glitches whatsoever.

But a Corning optical is not a passive cable. There is full protocol conversion taking place at both ends of that "cable." It's only viewed as a cable because they shrunk the circuitry down small enough to fit in housings at both ends of the optical and copper line. And of course the thing imposes sever limitations on 5VBUS usage.
 

svart-hvitt

Major Contributor
Joined
Aug 31, 2017
Messages
2,375
Likes
1,253
Shall we (i.e. I...) buy one Jenving Supra USB A-B 15 m for Amir to measure?

Is it of any interest?

:)
 

Fitzcaraldo215

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 4, 2016
Messages
1,440
Likes
634
But a Corning optical is not a passive cable. There is full protocol conversion taking place at both ends of that "cable." It's only viewed as a cable because they shrunk the circuitry down small enough to fit in housings at both ends of the optical and copper line. And of course the thing imposes sever limitations on 5VBUS usage.
Yes, of course. But, what is your point? Why does a USB cable have to be passive as long as it works in doing the job?
 

Superdad

Active Member
Audio Company
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
149
Likes
91
Yes, of course. But, what is your point? Why does a USB cable have to be passive as long as it works in doing the job?

When is a cable not a cable? When it is an active device with circuity that does protocol conversions, affects signal integrity, and changes the way a user has to think about using it with normal USB devices (due to 5VBUS limitations). It might as well be boxes at both ends.
 

Fitzcaraldo215

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 4, 2016
Messages
1,440
Likes
634
When is a cable not a cable? When it is an active device with circuity that does protocol conversions, affects signal integrity, and changes the way a user has to think about using it with normal USB devices (due to 5VBUS limitations). It might as well be boxes at both ends.
Some may care about exquisitely proper, precise and narrow definitions of "cables". Others, like me don't care, as long as they perform the communications function for which they were intended. To us, they are only a means to a functional goal. How they work is not a major concern, as long as they do the job. If it looks and acts just like a passive cable, why the hair splitting?

So, how do these non-passive cables, like Corning, affect signal integrity? Do you happen to have measurements indicating they do not? We all would love to see them.

How do they affect "the way a user has to think about it", God forbid, other than having to use a USB A-B adaptor, like any other USB extension cable? I note that the now infamous Regen also required one.
 
Top Bottom