Paul begins his commentary with: "Since we know that changing input cables—a high-end version vs. a dimestore copy—on a power amplifier in a highly resolving system is easy to hear, the null test should show the difference." (Underline added for emphasis.) That initial premise indicates his bias. Where is the proof that the premise is true or is he really positing something based on his bias?
He concludes his commentary with: "I haven’t the time nor the interest in performing these tests with any scientific rigor, but perhaps someone else wants to grab the flag and climb the mountain. It would have to be performed on a system where we actually do hear a difference. " (Underline added for emphasis.) This last pointiindicates his unwillingness to examine his presumption.
He concludes his commentary with: "I haven’t the time nor the interest in performing these tests with any scientific rigor, but perhaps someone else wants to grab the flag and climb the mountain. It would have to be performed on a system where we actually do hear a difference. " (Underline added for emphasis.) This last pointiindicates his unwillingness to examine his presumption.