- Thread Starter
- #221
Once again making PMC's roller coaster bass response look good. Good grief.This is his center speaker I tested that is MTM:
![]()
Clearly you want to see low frequency response to catch mistakes like this.
Once again making PMC's roller coaster bass response look good. Good grief.This is his center speaker I tested that is MTM:
![]()
Clearly you want to see low frequency response to catch mistakes like this.
Wow!This is his center speaker I tested that is MTM:
...
Clearly you want to see low frequency response to catch mistakes like this.
True, but it's much nicer being able to refer to the website rather than scrubbing through a video looking for graphs and where exactly he made this or that remark. Glad to see he hasn't abandoned the website as I was afraid he might have.Nothing on the EAC website that we really did not already get from his youtube.
+1True, but it's much nicer being able to refer to the website rather than scrubbing through a video looking for graphs and where exactly he made this or that remark. Glad to see he hasn't abandoned the website as I was afraid he might have.
You think Danny is farming out the design work on some of his stuff?Anyway, there is always a possibility that Danny did not design these speakers entirely himself, there's plenty of OEM and consultancies for speaker design.
Just being suspicious, such as his cables that seem awfully similar on what you can buy on AliExpress and the fact that he has a track record that all of his previous products measuring so terrible.You think Danny is farming out the design work on some of his stuff?
I don't think you know anything about him.
Absolutely, my thoughts exactly. Additionally despite that he does send data to spinaroma.org, but some data like distortion and compression aren't on spinaroma.True, but it's much nicer being able to refer to the website rather than scrubbing through a video looking for graphs and where exactly he made this or that remark. Glad to see he hasn't abandoned the website as I was afraid he might have.
No, I don't think so. He's a huckster, not an idiot. He does know how to design a crossover filter... Well, usually. And the cabinet is fine. It matches the t/s parameters of the woofer well enough.Just being suspicious, such as his cables that seem awfully similar on what you can buy on AliExpress and the fact that he has a track record that all of his previous products measuring so terrible.
Anyway, there will always be faithful defenders.
Often he compromises directivity for flatter direct sound, so I am not so sure there....He does know how to design a crossover filter... Well, usually.
How much of that is tradeoffs when you have drivers too far apart in size and refuse to use waveguides? I think quite a bit.Often he compromises directivity for flatter direct sound, so I am not so sure there....
He often makes the directivity worse than possible by using a higher crossover frequency just so that the on-axis driver summation with the limitations of a passive crossover looks nicer. This happens quite often at his crossover modifications.How much of that is tradeoffs when you have drivers too far apart in size and refuse to use waveguides? I think quite a bit.
You can sorta-kinda get around that with the "big dust cap acting like a quasi-mid-dome" thing ATC does on a couple of their 2-ways, but like... Those don't exactly have the greatest off axis behavior either.
He mentions directivity quite often with his improvements to speakers, but not distortion. Seems he ignores the latter entirely, as we see with the brave little worrior here (planar!). Ascilab was mentioned before. Why chose GR instead, don't see the point. As with In Ear Monitor headphones, or Fosi, those guys are going to just "do it", (nearly) perfect high fidelity for astounding little money. The myth is over, tech made to work finally, no need for storytelling anymore.He often makes the directivity worse than possible by using a higher crossover frequency just so that the on-axis driver summation with the limitations of a passive crossover looks nicer. This happens quite often at his crossover modifications.
Exactly this, no room for myth, back story or tuned by ‘guru’ designs when a few manufacturers publish the actual verified measurements .He mentions directivity quite often with his improvements to speakers, but not distortion. Seems he ignores the latter entirely, as we see with the brave little worrior here (planar!). Ascilab was mentioned before. Why chose GR instead, don't see the point. As with In Ear Monitor headphones, or Fosi, those guys are going to just "do it", (nearly) perfect high fidelity for astounding little money. The myth is over, tech made to work finally, no need for storytelling anymore.
He's talked about distortion and why he doesn't measure for it in a few of his video's.He mentions directivity quite often with his improvements to speakers, but not distortion. Seems he ignores the latter entirely, as we see with the brave little worrior here (planar!). Ascilab was mentioned before. Why chose GR instead, don't see the point. As with In Ear Monitor headphones, or Fosi, those guys are going to just "do it", (nearly) perfect high fidelity for astounding little money. The myth is over, tech made to work finally, no need for storytelling anymore.
nothing against Danny, but his speakers mostly don't compete objectively at their price point , i heard one of his speakers at the under $2000 monitor "shoot out" here in the phoenix metro area in 2022 (i think it was the encore model) it wasn't bad , but it had to go up directly against the philharmonic bmr and polk L200 even the speakerlab $500 mini monitor was pretty much as good ( in the same room) ....needless to say it didn't fare great against the bmr...Nothing on the EAC website that we really did not already get from his youtube. The NX-Bravo might sound pretty good, but the woofer has limited output capability and the tweeter still has its distortion issue.
At $2500, you can compare it to Erin’s recent review of the 3-way Super Linton. The Linton has much better overall performance and a real warranty.
Would you mind to link to such video, can't find a single one.He's talked about distortion and why he doesn't measure for it in a few of his video's.
You might not like the explanation. But he has mentioned it.
When modifying existing speakers per his current approach, you can't change drivers, driver spacing, baffle shape, etc, etc. So, you're quite limited to what you can achieve.
It's a weird business model, but there is a couple of bucks to be made. That's why he does it.
And of course, the opportunity to tweak people on audio forums.
He's talked about distortion and why he doesn't measure for it in a few of his video's.
You might not like the explanation. But he has mentioned it.
When modifying existing speakers per his current approach, you can't change drivers, driver spacing, baffle shape, etc, etc. So, you're quite limited to what you can achieve.
It's a weird business model, but there is a couple of bucks to be made. That's why he does it.
And of course, the opportunity to tweak people on audio forums.