Yes it looks like it was his suggestion , I tried that many I sort of lost track .That’s great.
So the rightmost correction is @Eetu’s suggestion right?
Not sure about the leftmost one TBH. Its frequency seems a bit high to really combat boominess on its own. Could you share the settings of that one too?
If you feel it works I’d keep that one for the time being.Yes it looks like it was his suggestion
Sorry that has gone a bit over my head I am afraid.If you feel it works I’d keep that one for the time being.
To give you an idea about the other correction, here you see a measurement, a target response, a list of corrections, and a post-correction prediction. See if you can identify all four.
While it’s true that there is a peak in neighborhood of 200Hz (make sure you spot it), you also see three other peaks to the left of it that need addressing, most notably the one around 90Hz.
Looking at for instance your chart my bet is that you have a couple of similar <200Hz peaks too. I’d try and focus on those. Especially when the 200Hz correction was not based on data.
Hope this makes sense. Please don’t feel intimidated. Most happy to help you get to grips with this.
Its frequency seems a bit high to really combat boominess on its own.
What you need to do is find these other peaks. The ones at frequencies lower than 200Hz. Then dial those down as well. This will truly fix your boomy bass.and the bass can be a bit boomy, like overpowers at times .
You have hit the nail on the head …I have no idea how to do this . I see what you are getting at now though .It’s just to illustrate this point:
The screenshot in the linked post is about my own set in my own room, correct. However there are several reasons to believe you too have a number of peaks below 200Hz. One reason being the bars in the chart you posted yourself.
What you need to do is find these other peaks. The ones at frequencies lower than 200Hz. Then dial those down as well. This will truly fix your boomy bass.
Is this something you would be willing to give a shot? Ignoring for a moment whether you know how to do this exactly?
You could do that, but before you do, if possible, do this.I could try and play about with a few bands just below the 200Hz area?
Sorry again not sure what I can do with the above video. I am willing to try but not sure how to find it.You could do that, but before you do, if possible, do this.
Even if you would find only one obviously peaking frequency that way, you’d already be in a much better place than you are now. Without further data it just seems unlikely that in your case the one major peak to start with is the 200Hz one you are currently addressing. Not impossible but very unlikely.
Hope this helps.
Yes and yes.Do you mean at certain points in that video it will get louder?? Note the points where it does?
I hope others can chime in and help you with this part.still a touch of sibilance on some female vocals
Thanks again, I will try and do this sometime this week hopefully. I dont understand the bit I have highlighted............what bars in the plot?Yes and yes.
Don’t forget to turn off your EQ. Watch the video over your speakers in your room and first just listen. See if you can hear loudness fluctuations at all.
When you do, give it another listen and note the displayed frequencies that seem loudest to you. Maybe one part specifically stands out. In my case that would be around 90Hz for instance. In yours it may be different, perhaps it’s 80Hz, maybe 110Hz or anything in between, or something lower or something higher. Maybe you’ll find two particularly loud peaks, we don’t know.
When you’ve found one or a couple, take your chart and see if you can identify the frequencies you found as bars in the plot. This part is optional but could give some confirmation that you’re on the right track. If instead it rather confuses, don’t worry too much about it. What you heard and noted is more important than what you simulated at this point.
Please report back.
I hope others can chime in and help you with this part.
There is a bar chart of sorts in the attachment to this post. It's the bars in that chart that I'm referring to.what bars in the plot?
I will be looking to do this when I have enough time to do it properly .There is a bar chart of sorts in the attachment to this post. It's the bars in that chart that I'm referring to.
Every bar denotes a room mode frequency. They were calculated from the dimensions you entered above the chart. Depending on your listening position some of these frequencies sound noticably louder than normal, leading to peaks in your response, and eventually the impression of bass boominess.
So that's why I'm hoping you will play the video, notice the fluctuations, and try and identify the frequencies at which the peaks occur. Then optionally you could see if your observations correspond to what you simulated with your bar chart. But don't worry if you struggle with this optional bit. What you observe in the video is more important at this point.
Good luck and please report back!
So i have tried this tonight and these are the points where it got really loudThere is a bar chart of sorts in the attachment to this post. It's the bars in that chart that I'm referring to.
Every bar denotes a room mode frequency. They were calculated from the dimensions you entered above the chart. Depending on your listening position some of these frequencies sound noticably louder than normal, leading to peaks in your response, and eventually the impression of bass boominess.
So that's why I'm hoping you will play the video, notice the fluctuations, and try and identify the frequencies at which the peaks occur. Then optionally you could see if your observations correspond to what you simulated with your bar chart. But don't worry if you struggle with this optional bit. What you observe in the video is more important at this point.
Good luck and please report back!