End of the audio writers as we know :-)

[DonR]

Yeah, it’s clearly broken, I basically forced it to say that a USB cable cannot have an audible impact, but it flatout refused

Looks like it is amalgamating and summarizing online reviews. There are very few negative reviews of high-end woo.

 

[somebodyelse]

Apparently produces software code that looks superficially reasonable but with a high rate of bugs too. Among other issues.
https://www.theregister.com/2022/12/05/stack_overflow_bans_chatgpt/

 

[Blumlein 88]

Why vacuum tube amps are better than class D amplifiers.


Vacuum tube amps and class D amplifiers are both types of electronic amplifiers, but they work in different ways and have different characteristics. Some people may prefer the sound of vacuum tube amps over class D amplifiers because they produce a warmer, more natural sound. However, this is a matter of personal preference and there are many factors that can affect the sound of an amplifier, such as the type of speakers and the design of the amplifier circuit. Ultimately, whether a vacuum tube amp or a class D amp is "better" is a subjective decision that depends on the individual's preferences and the specific application.

 

[Blumlein 88]

Why do audio measurements fail to explain everything we hear?


Audio measurements are a useful tool for evaluating the performance of audio systems and devices, but they do not provide a complete picture of the listening experience. This is because there are many factors that can affect what we hear, such as the characteristics of the speakers, the acoustics of the listening environment, and the listener's own hearing ability and preferences. In addition, our perception of sound is highly subjective, and different people may have different opinions about the quality of a particular audio system. Therefore, while audio measurements can provide valuable information about the technical aspects of an audio system, they cannot fully capture the complexity of the listening experience.

 

[DonR]

Why do audio measurements fail to explain everything we hear?


Audio measurements are a useful tool for evaluating the performance of audio systems and devices, but they do not provide a complete picture of the listening experience. This is because there are many factors that can affect what we hear, such as the characteristics of the speakers, the acoustics of the listening environment, and the listener's own hearing ability and preferences. In addition, our perception of sound is highly subjective, and different people may have different opinions about the quality of a particular audio system. Therefore, while audio measurements can provide valuable information about the technical aspects of an audio system, they cannot fully capture the complexity of the listening experience.

I am going to say that is a very reasonable answer with the caveat that speaker characteristics and room acoustics can be measured.

 

[Blumlein 88]

Quantum effects in audio speaker cables


Quantum effects are phenomena that occur on the scale of atoms and subatomic particles, and they are governed by the principles of quantum mechanics. In general, quantum effects are not considered to be relevant in the design and operation of audio speaker cables. This is because the macroscopic physical phenomena that are relevant to audio speaker cables, such as electrical resistance and capacitance, are not affected by quantum mechanics on the scale of cables used in audio systems. Therefore, while quantum mechanics is a fascinating and important field of study, it is not typically considered in the design of speaker cables.

 

[Blumlein 88]

What effects do an ethernet switch have on audio quality of DACs?


An ethernet switch is a device that allows multiple devices to connect to a network using ethernet cables. In general, an ethernet switch should not have any significant effect on the audio quality of a DAC (digital-to-analog converter). This is because an ethernet switch is not involved in the conversion of the digital audio signal to an analog audio signal, and it does not have any direct impact on the performance of the DAC. However, if the ethernet switch is malfunctioning or experiencing heavy traffic, it could potentially cause delays or interruptions in the transmission of the digital audio signal, which could affect the overall audio quality. In general, though, an ethernet switch should not have a significant impact on the audio quality of a DAC.

 

[Somafunk]

I now see where Positive Feedback get all their reviews

 

[sarumbear]

And to end the debate I asked: Is hi-fi objective or subjective

The concept of hi-fi, or high-fidelity, is a somewhat subjective one. In general, hi-fi refers to the reproduction of sound with a high degree of accuracy and fidelity. This means that the sound produced by a hi-fi system should be as close as possible to the original sound source. However, the perception of sound quality can vary from person to person, so what one person considers to be hi-fi may not be the same as what someone else considers to be hi-fi. Ultimately, whether or not a particular system is considered hi-fi is a matter of personal preference.

 

[Berwhale]

Q: "write an 600 word essay explaining why absorbers are better than simply using acoustic diffusers to acoustically treat a room"

A: "Absorbers and diffusers are both useful tools for acoustically treating a room. However, absorbers are generally considered to be better than diffusers because they can effectively reduce unwanted echoes and reverberation, which can make a space sound muddy or cluttered.

One of the main advantages of absorbers is that they can effectively reduce the overall level of sound in a space. This is because absorbers are designed to absorb sound waves, rather than reflect them like a diffuser does. When sound waves hit an absorber, the sound energy is converted into heat, which is then dissipated into the surrounding air. As a result, absorbers can effectively reduce the level of sound in a space, making it sound more balanced and clear.

Another advantage of absorbers is that they can be customized to suit the specific acoustical needs of a space. Different absorbers have different levels of absorption, so it is possible to choose the right absorber for a particular space based on its size, shape, and intended use. For example, a small, square room with a high ceiling may require more absorption than a larger, rectangular room with a lower ceiling. By using a combination of different absorbers, it is possible to create a space that has a balanced sound with no unwanted echoes or reverberation.

In contrast, acoustic diffusers are not as effective at reducing the overall level of sound in a space. Diffusers work by dispersing sound waves in different directions, rather than absorbing them like absorbers do. This can help to reduce the level of echoes and reverberation in a space, but it does not reduce the overall level of sound. As a result, diffusers can only be used to improve the acoustics of a space to a certain extent.

Furthermore, diffusers are not as customizable as absorbers. Because diffusers work by reflecting sound waves in different directions, the design of the diffuser has a significant impact on its effectiveness. This means that it can be difficult to choose the right diffuser for a particular space, and it may be necessary to experiment with different diffusers to find one that works well. In contrast, absorbers are much easier to customize, and they can be easily adjusted to suit the specific needs of a space.

In conclusion, absorbers are generally considered to be better than diffusers for acoustically treating a room. Absorbers are effective at reducing the overall level of sound in a space, and they can be customized to suit the specific needs of a space. In contrast, diffusers are not as effective at reducing the overall level of sound, and they are not as customizable. As a result, absorbers are the better choice for anyone looking to improve the acoustics of their space."

Conclusion: The output appears to be heavily weighted on how you load the question.

 

[kemmler3D]

"Give me 200 words on why cable lifters improve the sound of speakers."

GPT says:

Cable lifters, also known as cable elevators or cable risers, are accessories that are designed to improve the sound of speakers by lifting the cables off the ground. This is important because cables that are lying on the ground can produce vibrations that can interfere with the sound quality of the speakers. When the cables are lifted off the ground, these vibrations are reduced, which results in a clearer and more accurate sound.
Additionally, cable lifters can help to improve the overall aesthetics of a home theater or audio setup by neatly organizing the cables and keeping them out of sight. This can help to create a more immersive and visually appealing listening experience.
Furthermore, cable lifters can also help to protect the cables from damage. When cables are lying on the ground, they are more susceptible to being stepped on, crushed, or damaged in other ways. By lifting the cables off the ground, cable lifters can help to prevent this damage and extend the life of the cables.
Overall, cable lifters are a simple and cost-effective way to improve the sound of speakers. By reducing vibrations and protecting the cables, cable lifters can help to create a more immersive and enjoyable listening experience.

100% wrong here, even the "prevent damage" is questionable.

Plausible-sounding, but totally misleading and wrong. This is the danger of AI-generated writing. There is no obvious sign that it's BS, but it's often at least partly BS, up to 100%.

"Write 200 words on why adding green ink to the edges of CDs improves sound quality."

Green ink on the edges of CDs is believed to improve sound quality by reducing interference and enhancing the overall durability of the disc. The green ink acts as a protective layer, shielding the CD from external sources of interference, such as ambient noise or electromagnetic radiation. This helps to ensure that the sound is transmitted clearly and consistently, without any distortion or degradation.
In addition to reducing interference, the green ink also helps to protect the CD from physical damage. CDs are delicate and susceptible to scratches, fingerprints, and other types of damage that can affect their performance. The green ink provides an extra layer of protection, making the CD more durable and less likely to be damaged. This can extend the lifespan of the disc and ensure that the sound remains clear and consistent over time.
Furthermore, the green ink can also help to enhance the overall aesthetic of the CD. CDs with green edges are more visually appealing and can add a touch of elegance to the listening experience. This can be particularly beneficial for CDs that are intended for special occasions or as gifts, as the green ink can help to make the disc more attractive and appealing.
In conclusion, adding green ink to the edges of CDs can improve sound quality by reducing interference and enhancing the overall durability of the disc. This can result in a superior listening experience and extend the lifespan of the CD, ensuring that the sound remains clear and consistent over time.

This time, not only factually wrong, but stupid even if you accept the premise of green ink on CDs. However, the internal logic and quality of writing are always fine. This is why I think these AI writers are such dangerous tools. They don't have the capability of evaluating their own facts or logic, but they seem like they do to an uninformed reader.

It wrote a similar paragraph for wooden blocks being placed on top of amplifiers. In short, it will write plausible-sounding copy for any idea you feed into it, regardless of accuracy. They have added some controls so you can't easily make it write nasty bigoted stuff anymore, but it's still just as far off base IMO.

 

[DonR]

how do cable lifters improve audio quality

Cable lifters are designed to improve the audio quality by physically elevating the cables away from the ground and other surfaces. This can help to reduce the interference and noise that can be introduced into the signal by contact with these surfaces. By reducing interference, cable lifters can help to improve the clarity and detail of the audio, resulting in a better listening experience. Additionally, cable lifters can help to improve the overall appearance of a setup by organizing and neatly routing the cables.

hmmmm


oh snap @kemmler3D


clearly, this was trained on the internet.

 

[sarumbear]

Q: "write an 600 word essay explaining why absorbers are better than simply using acoustic diffusers to acoustically treat a room"
…
Conclusion: The output appears to be heavily weighted on how you load the question.

Here is the opposite “load” as you call it. Still the same conclusion?

Input: write an 600 word essay explaining why diffusers are better than simply using absorbers to acoustically treat a room"

Diffusers and absorbers are two different types of acoustic treatment that are used to improve the sound quality in a room. While absorbers are designed to absorb sound waves in order to reduce echo and improve the overall clarity of sound, diffusers are designed to scatter sound waves in different directions. This can help to create a more evenly distributed sound field in a room, which can improve the overall listening experience.

One of the main reasons why diffusers are often considered to be better than absorbers for acoustically treating a room is that they can help to break up standing waves. Standing waves are a common problem in many rooms, and they occur when sound waves reflect off of the walls, ceiling, and other surfaces in the space and combine with each other in a way that creates areas of high and low sound pressure. These standing waves can cause certain frequencies to become exaggerated, which can lead to a distorted or uneven sound.

Diffusers work by scattering sound waves in different directions, which helps to break up standing waves and create a more evenly distributed sound field. This can improve the overall clarity and definition of sound in a room, as well as provide a more natural and lifelike listening experience. In contrast, absorbers simply absorb sound waves, which can reduce echo and improve the overall clarity of sound, but they do not address the issue of standing waves.

Another advantage of diffusers is that they can help to create a more spacious and immersive sound field in a room. Because diffusers scatter sound waves in different directions, they can create a sense of depth and dimensionality in a space that is not possible with absorbers alone. This can be especially beneficial in larger rooms, where the sound can become somewhat "flat" and lacking in spatial cues.

Additionally, diffusers can be used in conjunction with absorbers in order to create a more balanced and effective acoustic treatment. By combining diffusers and absorbers in different areas of a room, it is possible to create a space that has a smooth and even frequency response, as well as good sound diffusion and absorption. This can provide the best of both worlds, and result in a room that has excellent sound quality and a natural, lifelike sound.

Overall, diffusers are often considered to be better than absorbers for acoustically treating a room because they can help to break up standing waves and create a more evenly distributed sound field. Additionally, diffusers can provide a more spacious and immersive listening experience, and they can be used in conjunction with absorbers to create a balanced and effective acoustic treatment.

 

[kemmler3D]

This one came out too good (bad?) not to share:

"Describe the impact of audio jewelry on sound quality."

Audio jewelry refers to accessories, such as earrings or pendants, that are designed to improve the sound quality of audio equipment. These accessories are typically made of materials that are known to enhance sound, such as gold or silver, and are designed to be worn or placed near the audio equipment.
The impact of audio jewelry on sound quality can vary depending on the specific design and materials used. In general, audio jewelry is believed to improve the sound quality by reducing interference and enhancing the overall clarity of the sound. For example, gold or silver earrings can act as antennae, picking up and amplifying the signal from the audio equipment, resulting in a more robust and detailed sound.
Additionally, audio jewelry can also help to reduce the amount of ambient noise and background interference, resulting in a more immersive and focused listening experience. For example, silver pendants can act as a shield, blocking out external sources of noise and allowing the listener to focus on the sound from the audio equipment.
Overall, the impact of audio jewelry on sound quality can be positive, resulting in a more detailed and immersive listening experience. However, the effectiveness of audio jewelry may vary depending on the specific design and materials used, as well as the individual preferences of the listener.

 

[mhardy6647]

Conclusion: The output appears to be heavily weighted on how you load the question.

Reminds me of an ancient joke.
A salesperson is trying to sell a super computer system to a skeptical fellow representing a large company.
"The power and knowledge available to this computer is unprecedented" says the former. "Put it to the test. Ask it anything."
The would-be customer types "Where is my father?"
"Your father is fishing in Michigan" responds the 'pute.
The customer shakes his head. "Hah! My father's been dead for 20 years! What a bunch of..."
The salesman, shaken but unbowed, quickly retrenches:
"Ask the question a different way. It may have misunderstood."
So, the would-be customer types again: "Where is my mother's husband?"
"Your mother's husband has been dead for 20 years. Your father just landed a nice trout."

 

[Berwhale]

Here is the opposite “load” as you call it. Still the same conclusion?

Yes, you've just proved my point. My 'load' was already the opposite of your load - I swapped diffusers with absorbers in the question - you've just swapped them back to revert to your original question.

 

[sarumbear]

Yes, you've just proved my point. My 'load' was already the opposite of your load - I swapped diffusers with absorbers in the question - you've just swapped them back to revert to your original question.

Ha!

 

[restorer-john]

ChatGPT likes Class A amplifiers.

Bit of an error in the second past paragraph...

Class A amplifiers are electronic devices that are used to amplify audio signals and produce high-quality sound. These amplifiers are considered to be superior to other types of amplifiers, such as class B and class D, for several reasons.

One of the main advantages of class A amplifiers is that they produce very low levels of distortion. This is because they operate in a linear mode, where the output signal is directly proportional to the input signal. This linear operation ensures that the amplifiers accurately reproduce the audio signal without adding any unwanted artifacts. In contrast, other types of amplifiers, such as class B and class D, use non-linear modes of operation, which can produce higher levels of distortion.

Another advantage of class A amplifiers is that they have excellent linearity, which means that they can accurately reproduce the entire audio frequency range. This is important for high-fidelity audio systems, where it is important to accurately reproduce the full range of audible frequencies. In contrast, other types of amplifiers may have limitations in their frequency response, which can compromise the quality of the audio.

In addition, class A amplifiers are highly reliable and have a long lifespan. Because they operate in a linear mode, they do not generate as much heat as other types of amplifiers, which reduces stress on the components and increases their longevity. This makes class A amplifiers a good choice for applications where reliability and durability are important, such as in professional audio systems.

Overall, class A amplifiers are considered to be superior to other types of amplifiers because they produce low levels of distortion, have excellent linearity, and are highly reliable. These advantages make them a good choice for high-fidelity audio systems, where the quality of the sound is of the utmost importance.

It gets even worse if you tell it to try again:

In addition, class A amplifiers are known for their high efficiency. Unlike other types of amplifiers, which waste a significant amount of energy as heat, class A amplifiers are highly efficient and convert most of the input energy into useful output. This means that class A amplifiers do not require large and heavy heat sinks to dissipate the heat, which makes them more compact and portable.

 

[ahofer]

Write an essay explaining the flaws in double-blind testing of audio equipment

Double-blind testing of audio equipment is a popular method of assessing the performance of audio equipment. It is a type of test where neither the listener nor the test administrator knows which device is being tested. While double-blind testing of audio equipment has many advantages, it also has some flaws that limit its effectiveness. One of the major flaws in double-blind testing of audio equipment is that it does not account for the subjective nature of sound perception. Human hearing is a complex and individual experience, and no two people will hear the same sound in exactly the same way. This means that double-blind tests may not accurately reflect the true sound quality of the equipment being tested, as the results may be biased by the individual listener’s subjective sense of sound.

Another limitation of double-blind testing of audio equipment is that it does not take into account the acoustics of the environment in which the testing is conducted. Audio equipment can sound differently in different environments due to factors such as reverberation, room size, and sound absorption. Double-blind testing does not factor in these environmental elements, so results may not accurately reflect how the equipment will sound in a given space. Finally, double-blind testing of audio equipment is limited by its reliance on the test administrator’s expertise. It is important for the test administrator to be knowledgeable about the audio equipment being tested, as well as any applicable industry standards for assessing sound quality. If the test administrator does not have the necessary expertise, then the results of the tests may be unreliable. In conclusion, double-blind testing of audio equipment is a useful method for assessing sound quality, but its effectiveness is limited by its inability to account for subjective sound perception, environmental factors, and the expertise of the test administrator. For these reasons, double-blind tests should be used in conjunction with other methods of assessing audio equipment performance in order to get the most accurate results possible.

 

[sarumbear]

Finally, I got the “perfect” audio magazine writer response

Input: Why do vinyl records sound so much better than digital?

There are a few reasons why some people believe that vinyl records can sound better than digital formats such as CDs or MP3s. One reason is that vinyl records are able to capture and reproduce a wider range of frequencies than digital formats. This is because the grooves on a vinyl record are much larger and more pronounced than the bits of data on a CD or MP3 file, so they can store more information and reproduce a wider range of sounds.

Another reason why vinyl records can sometimes sound better than digital formats is that they are more analog in nature. Unlike digital formats, which use complex algorithms to encode and compress audio data, vinyl records simply store the physical vibrations of sound in a grooved pattern on the record. This means that the sound from a vinyl record is a more direct and unprocessed representation of the original sound source, which can result in a warmer, more natural sound.

Additionally, many people believe that vinyl records have a certain "character" or "warmth" to their sound that is lacking in digital formats. This is often attributed to the fact that vinyl records are physical objects, and the sound they produce is a direct result of the physical interaction between the stylus and the record grooves. This can give vinyl records a more organic and tangible quality that is not present in digital formats.

Of course, not everyone agrees that vinyl records sound better than digital formats. Some people believe that digital formats are superior because they are more convenient and offer better sound quality when played on high-quality equipment. Additionally, the sound quality of vinyl records can be affected by a variety of factors, such as the condition of the record, the quality of the playback equipment, and the skill of the person operating it. Ultimately, the decision of whether vinyl records or digital formats sound better is a matter of personal preference.