I gave up on "perfect" a long time ago. I think the best solution is multiple systems. Then you can enjoy the strengths of each one.
Me too.
I think some recordings call for the "you are there experience", where a higher reflected-to-direct ratio of sound works best.
And some for the "they are here experience", that favors higher direct-to-reflected.
So there is no single speaker radiation pattern that fits imo, making both experiences sound best.
Even with a neutral full-range system in a well treated room, tonal variations induced in mastering by the circle-of-confusion , will have some tracks sounding bass heavy, some tracks sounding overly bright.
I do think a neutral system is the benchmark and overall preference by far despite those tonal variations,
but I must say it's nice to hear misbehaving tracks sound significantly better sometimes, on other less-than-neutral systems .
Helps me learn/hear, especially how to apply track adjusting EQs. (I think every system should have real time easy to use tone-control available)
I think recordings each have some particular SPL level, that lets them shine.
Some like the quiet subtle beauty that my electrostats can produce. Some are made loud to played loud as Joe Walsh would say, and need a high powered rig, like quality studio or theatre speakers.
And then there's bass, extension and power. Some music, dub, hip-hop, and occasional rock/country for example, needs 'hay-stack' sub capability well beyond what might be regarded as a neutral system.
The real clincher for me, is that every room sounds different too.....put it all together, and well....
......I like enjoying the variety.
As the old saying goes...they all wiggle a little different
