sucramhabib
Member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2021
- Messages
- 15
- Likes
- 13
I guess I did attack you. My apologies!
My point is, they have an engineering team; knowing the C1+ is vertically aligned, it makes sense to think the idea of vertical alignment was discussed. They made a compromise. Solving one problem may also introduce others.
They had a budget, a target price and a design goal; went through many iterations, tested and measured the speaker and made informed decisions on what compromises they'd make. To say it's a broken design is inaccurate. It operates as intended and in some areas it does not measure well.
Just because it doesn't measure perfectly doesn't mean it sounds (tonally) bad. Conversely, products that measure perfectly may sound terrible.
My point is, they have an engineering team; knowing the C1+ is vertically aligned, it makes sense to think the idea of vertical alignment was discussed. They made a compromise. Solving one problem may also introduce others.
They had a budget, a target price and a design goal; went through many iterations, tested and measured the speaker and made informed decisions on what compromises they'd make. To say it's a broken design is inaccurate. It operates as intended and in some areas it does not measure well.
Just because it doesn't measure perfectly doesn't mean it sounds (tonally) bad. Conversely, products that measure perfectly may sound terrible.