I bought the ELAC B6.2's on Black Friday, 2018, for $150 for the pair. Shortly thereafter, the price rose to $250. Then over the past few months, like you say @tvrgreek, the price went up to $400. (Actually, checking Amazon now, they seem to be on sale for $320. But as of last week, they were $400. So for purposes of this post they're 400 bucks!
Anyway, so the point I wanna make is that
THE ELAC DEBUT 2.0 B6.2s STARTED SOUNDING A LOT BETTER TO ME ONCE I REALIZED I OWNED A PAIR OF $400 SPEAKERS, rather than a set of $150 cheapies.
So, I was thinking to myself, Oh, now I know why those folks at Stereophile get more excited as the price of equipment rises into the high bling region. Cause it was happening to me!
Of course, $400 to me must be what ̶$̶1̶0̶,̶0̶0̶0̶ $25,000 is like to the average Stereophile reader who actually puts stock in their recommendations as to how to ̶p̶i̶s̶s̶ ̶a̶w̶a̶y̶ spend their RSU payouts or Wall St. bonuses. E.g., a reader with mucho money and poco tech background, as opposed to us drive-by readers who go to the site to complain about their lack of rigor and rigor-mortis-inducing As We Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz It essays).
There seem to be only two folks there who don't overmuch exhibit this behavior. The first, JA1, has the unenviable and delicate task of synthesizing the FR and distortion et al data into pithy conclusions which can be decoded by the knowledgeable while neither alerting nor dissuading readers and advertisers. The second is our own estimable Dr.
@Kal Rubinson, who as a bona fide neuroscientist and professor of medicine (emeritus) understands better than the rest of us combined how our brains work and what it means when we think we think something.