Also there is 283.3I cant see a reason why one should buy those speakers .
There are better alternatives.
View attachment 209412View attachment 209413
View attachment 209414View attachment 209415
That AMT tweeter sure as heck looks like the $35 AMT Mini-8 from Dayton / Parts Express. https://www.parts-express.com/Dayton-Audio-AMT-Mini-8-Air-Motion-Transformer-Tweeter-275-095View attachment 209422
Thank you for the test.View attachment 209384
The on-axis response looks pretty good until we land in that ditch at 2.8 kHz. In a video I watched, Andrew talked about the challenge of the AMT tweeter not being able to reach as low as dome tweeter. I thought he had solved that problem but seeing this hole, it seems that was not.
I can't quite tell where the hole is from near-field measurements due to in ability to precisely match the driver responses:
View attachment 209385
Conclusions
The Carina BS243.4 comes close to a well executed speaker. But for whatever reason, decision was made to leave a response hole in rather critical region. Is this an attempt at "BBC dip" to please people believing in that? Or an oversight? The degradation is not large but it is a miss regardless. Fortunately it is easily corrected. Once there you are presented with a wide dispersion speaker with very nice sound and spatial qualities which I enjoyed.
Because they sound good, actually really good.I had the opportunity to listen to them in two different setup and I loved them. At the end I bought the more expensive sisters (Elac Vela BS 403) the are a little bit more neutral and refined but probably less exciting.I cant see a reason why one should buy those speakers .
There are better alternatives.
View attachment 209412View attachment 209413
View attachment 209414View attachment 209415
In Europe they are a little bit less than 1000 Euro/pairThank you for the test.
The low frequency driver has pretty high Q, 6dB+ null around crossover point, which is clearly the issue observed from the tests. BBC dip is a very wide dip. The low frequency driver's cone is breaking around 3kHz and hence it is not suitable for a 2-way speaker crossing over above 1.5kHz and with a fast slope. The issue is not caused by the tweeter.
I personally cannot see this nowhere near as a well executed speaker. 101 in speaker design says chose drive units to suit the job. There is simply no reason other than cost to utilise a driver that has such a large dip at the crossover frequency. However, this is not a cheap speaker: it is $2000 a pair!
I was fooled by @amirm's price figure I assumed a single unit is $999 as he said "It is on kind loan from a member and sells for US $999." It being a single unit.In Europe they are a little bit less than 1000 Euro/pair
Or MOST likely could be intentional.The dip is right at the crossover. This speaker appears to use pretty high-order filters. Either the woofer lowpass is slightly too low, or the tweeter highpass is slightly too high, or some combination thereof. The response of the two drivers doesn't quite overlap enough on-axis. It could even be a parts-tolerance issue in the crossover, or it could be the best they could do with reasonable tolerance (price) parts.
I think they were $1199 when they first came out. Then the might have been raised to $1499, but I'm not sure. Now they are listed at $999/pair on a couple of sites.
You should buy the ones that you like more when you compare their sound in a store. I highly believe in accurate measurements of hifi devices but when it comes to speakers it's also extremely important how they actually sound (even better if you can test them n your listening room at home).I was fooled by @amirm's price figure I assumed a single unit is $999 as he said "It is on kind loan from a member and sells for US $999." It being a single unit.
In the UK a pair of these speakers sell for £999, the same as a KEF LS50 Meta. Which one should I buy, the one with a deep hole in the frequency response or the one with is flat and wide as a pancake?
I disagree. Look at the low-frequency driver response by itself, no summing. Do you know a LP filter that can generate such a dip?Either the woofer lowpass is slightly too low, or the tweeter highpass is slightly too high, or some combination thereof. The response of the two drivers doesn't quite overlap enough on-axis. It could even be a parts-tolerance issue in the crossover, or it could be the best they could do with reasonable tolerance (price) parts.
I would guess that "Deep hole" would barely be noticeable in actual use.I was fooled by @amirm's price figure I assumed a single unit is $999 as he said "It is on kind loan from a member and sells for US $999." It being a single unit.
In the UK a pair of these speakers sell for £999, the same as a KEF LS50 Meta. Which one should I buy, the one with a deep hole in the frequency response or the one with is flat and wide as a pancake?
@amirm noticed it pretty clearly.I would guess that "Deep hole" would barely be noticeable in actual use.
I am not sure though, if he noticed it at first, or after seeing the measurement?@amirm noticed it pretty clearly.
So you are saying ignorance is bliss?But without knowing there was a small dip there, many times, I have no idea there is one, was what I meant.,
A crossover misalignment wouldn't show of as such a heavy peak in the distortion graph.The dip is right at the crossover. This speaker appears to use pretty high-order filters. Either the woofer lowpass is slightly too low, or the tweeter highpass is slightly too high, or some combination thereof. The response of the two drivers doesn't quite overlap enough on-axis. It could even be a parts-tolerance issue in the crossover, or it could be the best they could do with reasonable tolerance (price) parts.
I think they were $1199 when they first came out. Then the might have been raised to $1499, but I'm not sure. Now they are listed at $999/pair on a couple of sites.