crappypanther
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2021
- Messages
- 106
- Likes
- 75
Ugreen looks better
Based on zeropoint's contribution, I think Amir was pressing the wrong button.I hope yours turn on because ragged treble FR seems inconsequential compared to...
I'd take the edifier 10 times out of 10 over these. Even if you're just using rough tone controls, turning the treble down 3-4dB overall (rather than trying to EQ out peaks) should leave this with maybe not amazing treble performance, but "good enough", and they're *way* better in every other respect.These are $60 on Amazon, not sure which is better
This is a review, listening tests, EQ an detailed measurements of 1More Sonoflow Noise Cancelling Bluetooth headphones. It is on kind loan from a member and costs US $99 although goes on sale for $79.
![]()
The look and feel of the unit belies its low cost. The plastic seems stout and good quality. Pad feels soft and I like the nice large channel indicators in the red inserts. An app comes with lets you control the unit although I found the buttons very intuitive as well -- unlike many others I have tested.
Alas, the cups are just a bit too small to fully cover my ears so I can't...
- amirm
- Replies: 165
- Forum: Headphone & IEM Reviews & Discussions
Reading my review now, I have to say the Edifier is much better as far as tonality than the 1Moore. I think I was very impressed with the price of that headphone. Now that we have seen more products in this price category, my review of that would be much more negative if it were done today. My apologies for not being consistent enough in this regard.These are $60 on Amazon, not sure which is better
I'm thinking a lot of people are reacting to Amir's commentary more than the measurements themselves. Amir had issues with turning the headphones on for wireless use, which caused concern as to the reliability. However, this was likely due to a misunderstanding of the manual (Amir has yet to confirm if his unit turns on when pressing the correct button). Amir also stated himself that he would compare these favorably to others in the price category that he has reviewed previously, but his standards have sort of changed over time where now he's more critical than he was.Can someone TL;DR why this is considered a poor option by the community?
I’m genuinely curious.
Facts:
- Price: $70
- Tuning: Pretty good Harman target compliance (better than many in the price range)
- Design: Simple, clean, and elegant
- Distortion: Respectable—again, better than several competitors
So… what's the problem?
Is there another set at this price that checks all these boxes? If so, please name it.
Well, maybe many don't but I'm still following this topic, hoping @amirm manages to turn on these headphones and use them as intended (wireless). Maybe he could also repeat the measurements in BT mode, if time permits?I'm thinking a lot of people are reacting to Amir's commentary more than the measurements themselves. Amir had issues with turning the headphones on for wireless use, which caused concern as to the reliability. However, this was likely due to a misunderstanding of the manual (Amir has yet to confirm if his unit turns on when pressing the correct button). Amir also stated himself that he would compare these favorably to others in the price category that he has reviewed previously, but his standards have sort of changed over time where now he's more critical than he was.
Unfortunate as many probably won't come back to see that these actually probably rate as a very good set of powered headphones for the price, particularly if you can apply EQ to the treble region, but such is life. The review still did net Edifier at least one sale.
Well a couple people above commented they rated "Poor" because of Amir's problems with getting the wireless to work, apparently not understanding that a sample size of "1" tells you nothing about reliability (and apparently missing the comments suggesting that Amir may simply have been pressing the wrong button). I voted fine. Weird treble response that looks tricky to EQ, but great response below that, great distortion, great price.Can someone TL;DR why this is considered a poor option by the community?
I’m genuinely curious.
Facts:
- Price: $70
- Tuning: Pretty good Harman target compliance (better than many in the price range)
- Design: Simple, clean, and elegant
- Distortion: Respectable—again, better than several competitors
So… what's the problem?
Is there another set at this price that checks all these boxes? If so, please name it.
My vote has nothing to do with reliability, but with the fact that Amir was not able to turn the device on. There a big difference. The device could have worked perfectly and died during the test. That would have been a reliability issue. This is a functionality issue.Well a couple people above commented they rated "Poor" because of Amir's problems with getting the wireless to work, apparently not understanding that a sample size of "1" tells you nothing about reliability (and apparently missing the comments suggesting that Amir may simply have been pressing the wrong button). I voted fine. Weird treble response that looks tricky to EQ, but great response below that, great distortion, great price.
1More Sonoflow ANC Over ear I think is overall better.Are there any better options in the <$100 bracket? I've been using a Bose QC45 at work that I randomly won in a raffle a while back, but I'm continually annoyed by Bluetooth pairing issues, random sound quality issues (due again to flaky Bluetooth I suspect), and I can't find any reliable measurements to use for EQ. I tested just now, and they don't appear to be able to connect via USB as the Edifier can which is a feature I'd greatly appreciate.
After applying the EQ (which I can easily do with Equalizer APO), would you recommend these headphones @amirm? I think the earcups are pretty similar to the Bose QC45, which is fine enough for me.