Thank you guys, I didn't expect so many replies in such a short time. As I expected there will be different opinions. Each of you chose a different option.

Speakers really depend mostly on personal taste. The best would be if I could hear them but there is no way I can do this unless I order all these options and test them in my studio but this would be a bit ridiculous and then having all the issues with sending back all these big boxes.
Btw I found a new option Mackie HR624 mk2, new with 2 years warranty for 790€. It's a bit older model compared to other speakers in my list so would it even be as good as them as tech moves forward quite quickly.
I have the LYD 5 as near field monitors for my iMac, fed by an RME ADI-2 Pro.
It's very non-fatiguing, but also detailed.
This is the reason I'm looking at Dynaudio speakers because I saw quite some comments online that they are one of the smoothest and least fatigue speakers, no matter if passive or active.
There are ASR reviews for both the KH120 and the LYD7. KH120 has less distortion at normal listening levels. The LYD 7 has very good response on axis but Dynaudio made the weird decision to cross over the woofer and tweeter an octave above the normal range, so off-axis response isn't great.
In my own subjective experience, the KH120 are fantastic and LYD 7 are totally fine. I've never heard the Emit 10 but as a general rule of thumb passive monitors are not as efficient or accurate as active monitors (as active monitors cross over the signal prior to amplification which, all other things being equal, is more accurate and efficient than passive crossovers which have to split the already amplified signal and attenuate the unwanted frequencies).
If these are going in a living room, I'd take a hard look at the LYD7 as they're gorgeous and perform well, but for studio monitor or PC use I'd take the KH120s.
I was looking at this guy's video comparison of KH120 vs LYD 7 and he clearly prefers LYD 7.
I know it might all be taste depending and how we hear things as our ears are different and we all hear things differently but he has given some good points. He also said Neumanns are crisper harsher sounding which makes sense as they have a titanium fabric dome tweeter while Dynaudio have a soft/silk dome tweeter which would probably suit better my sensitive ears?
I had Neumann KH150 at home for two weeks. Got them for testing from a friend and honestly I was not blown away for a 3k speaker. Of course they were great sounding and quite different compared to my Focal CMS 50, better of course but 3k for a pair, uh. I found them a bit too crisp and tiresome even though I turned down highs completely on the back panel like I have on my CMS50. But they were a bit easier on my ears as my Focal CMS 50. I read that the old KH120 is less crisp and darker sounding then the newer KH120 II and KH150 which I might prefer.
DISCLAIMER - I don't own monitors and I don't do audio production.
Without a subwoofer, I'd get at-least 8-inch woofers. But maybe 7-inches is "close enough". The JBL 308 gets good reviews and they are only about $400 a pair.
Even then you might need a subwoofer for realistic bass you can "feel".
As long as the monitors aren't "terrible" they should be OK after you learn what a good mix sounds like on them in your studio/room. Of course, they shouldn't be annoying or fatiguing to your ears.
I recommend getting a measurement mic and REW to measure and EQ your speakers/room. If you can add bass traps and possibly other acoustic treatment that will probably help too. (Diagnosis before treatment.)
That's psychology.
In the pro world, near-field monitors are secondary monitors.
This is Floyd Toole:
JBL is a no go for me, not only does it look ugly but it's also fatigue according to some people and anything I have heard from JBL was fatigue. I would rather take the Mackie MR624 over JBL.
I have hyperacusis and I'm very sensitive to harsher speakers, some are a lot more fatigue than others so for me it's not really psychological.
Purely subjective, but I have a soft spot for Dynaudio speakers. My main system speakers are Contour 1.3 which are still going strong after 25 years and I fully expect them to outlast me.They cost about £1300 at the time, the modern equivalent Contour standmount is £4500.
I also have a much cheaper pair of DM 2/6 speakers, which would be a predecessor of the Emit 10. Surprisingly close to the Contour in sound, very open but not in any way harsh. Obviously no real sub bass, but good from 50hz up with a little wall reinforcement. And they can go loud, but depending on the size of your room, a decent 50 watt amp is probably all you need. Also works well with a class D mini-amp (Ayima A07) because although they're slightly current hungry, there's no big impedance swings which can upset the frequency response of those amps. I guess it would be the same with the Emit, as a benign impedance curve is a long standing Dynaudio design philosophy.
Compared to a very well reviewed Wharfedale floorstander at around the same price it is (dangerous phrase coming up) night and day. In comparison, the Wharfedales sound like you've put them inside a biscuit tin - muffled and thin sounding at the same time.
If it was me, if the Emit 10s you've found are in mint condition, I wouldn't hesitate. But try to listen to them first.
This used Emit 10s I'm looking at are in great condition, looking like new from the pictures and the guy said they are like new and that he treated them very carefully.
I was looking at these small chinese amps like Aiyima, Fosi... but I'm afraid they would sound bad or cheap and wouldn't be strong enough to power Emit's which are a bit demanding. I was also looking at the popular Wiim Amp. Would this be a good option? A really good option would probably be the Marantz Model M1 but it's a bit expensive.
Do you think that the Emit 10 with a budget amp like Aiyima, Fosi or Wiim Amp would even sound as good as LYD 7 or Neumann KH120?