Brilliant!Amps and smarts will be external.
Brilliant!Amps and smarts will be external.
They looked exciting at first but too big for my spaceWho here is going to buy them when they'll be available?
ThanksThey cost as much as a very nice car and are the size of a refrigerator, I don't know how many people here have both money and space for them.
These strike me mostly as a studio tool .
That must have been frustrating/exasperating/disappointing.Unfortunately, the amps got stuck in customs.
Amps and smarts will be external. Not built in as the 8c and 6c.
How much lower?The baffle appears to be about 24" wide. How much of a difference does the cardioid even make at that size?
And wouldn't it be possible to create the cardioid with the rear woofers instead of the passive design? It seems like pattern control would only be necessary up to 200-300Hz. The passive design was necessary on the 8C because of the physical size of the speaker. The main drawback was that pattern control came at the cost of output and the speaker is inefficient for its size at low frequencies. With such large dimensions on this one you could use the depth as an advantage to create a cardioid that boosts efficiency instead of reducing it. For such a large speaker it will have lower output than you would expect.
How much lower?
The max output is stated as 106dB. That is quite low for a speaker with three 8" drivers.How much lower?
Are we talking about the 15 S or the 8 s ? I'm lost in this thread...The max output is stated as 106dB. That is quite low for a speaker with three 8" drivers.
I've only done some crude modeling with VituidCAD to get an idea of how much you lose with the cardioid, so I don't want to give an exact figure, but you can see how bad the distortion is from Erin's review of the 8C. The cardioid extends down to 100Hz, and you can see how high distortion gets at relatively tame SPL levels for a speaker of its size. There is a significant loss of output from using a passive cardioid like this that is being corrected with heavy EQ.
Or not "exposed" to the sound of pro monitrs... You talk not about pro monitors, but about the Wilson Audio or Focal Utopias, which are completely different speakers, very overrated IMHO (especially the WA).I think these are aiming at the same audience for Focal Utopia/Wilson Audio. It's too big for small studios. I think super wealthy audiophiles or serious home theater enthusiasts who have been exposed to the sound of professional monitors.
I meant the crowd with big budgets who buy very expensive traditional speakers but might also appreciate designs focused on DSP.Or not "exposed" to the sound of pro monitrs... You talk not about pro monitors, but about the Wilson Audio or Focal Utopias, which are completely different speakers, very overrated IMHO (especially the WA).
So, what do you intend to say exactly ?
But why not In a studio too ?Just think it will eventually find its way into some fortunate person's home not just a mastering studio. They have RoomMatching after all.
You know what's often considered better than cardioid? Flush mount.But why not In a studio too ?
Sure, but only big ones. In a small studio you are too close, room modes dominate and you never use the headroom, so most of what the 15c can do is wasted.But why not In a studio too ?