MStan
Member
Well, 50 page long threads is not an argument. There are longer threads on the internet about whether cats are smarter than dogs. I didn't say my description was over the top; I said it may have been because of bias. I think in my case soundstage and imaging did fall apart to a noticeble degree. I speculate that there may be a psycho acoustic vs physical phenomenon going on such that any unnatural imbalance in the bass region, however small, causes the brain to process the whole signal including the upper range as wrong.I'm not necessarily disagreeing, it's just interesting given that we have 50 page long threads on this forum about the opposite being true (stereo subs being the way to go). And as you mentioned your description of the change was a bit over the top, which is why I replied initially. Soundstage and imaging doesn't fall apart with stereo subs.
The bass region is a foreign land. Strange things happen there. But thanks to Toole et al it is less strange now.
Last edited: