• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Douk Audio DAC-Q11--The first USB DAC with Switchable ESS9038Q2M and AK4493?

There are amps which perform better balanced..
I do not own any. If that is a consideration, then you need to buy something other than this.
As to me, I don't (and am highly likely to not ever) have anything that uses XLR in my personal home audio gear (as opposed to my PA gear).
 
This should be a great tool for people to find out for themselves whether different DAC chips sound different. A much better way to learn rather then being told or even mocked for wanting to know.

Absolutely. Just make sure to do the comparison in a reliable way:


The griping about this product by some people is pathetic.

Sorry, but sometimes it's just hard to resist.

When something appears a bit like a person presenting a healing crystal that's quartz in one end and amethyst in the other, making it easy to compare the healing properties, it's just damn hard to resist making a joke or two about it.

Hopefully, the outputs are matched though.

Indeed. Without the levels being matched precisely, any "comparison" will be completely pointless.
 
Sorry, but sometimes it's just hard to resist.

When something appears a bit like a person presenting a healing crystal that's quartz in one end and amethyst in the other, making it easy to compare the healing properties, it's just damn hard to resist making a joke or two about it.
lol, I'd happily joke along with you with that example!
 
I do not own any. If that is a consideration, then you need to buy something other than this.
As to me, I don't (and am highly likely to not ever) have anything that uses XLR in my personal home audio gear (as opposed to my PA gear).
Just pointing out that there is use for balanced outputs. I generally prefer TRS and XLR over RCA as well..
I'd rather take that than 2 DAC chips, one of which runs 0.2v lower than the other, which makes comparisons pointless and difficult to do
 
  • Like
Reactions: EJ3
They are definitely designed and made by two different companies.

However, lab grade demineralized water, made using two different filtration systems from two different companies, probably still taste like the same nothing.
Apples and Oranges. Or, DAC Chips and water, if you will.
 
Just pointing out that there is use for balanced outputs. I generally prefer TRS and XLR over RCA as well..
I'd rather take that than 2 DAC chips, one of which runs 0.2v lower than the other, which makes comparisons pointless and difficult to do
I'm not taking this 2 different DAC chips , one of which runs 0.2v lower than the other, which makes comparisons pointless and difficult to do,
either.
It seems like a very odd implementation of a product.
 
Let's discuss Douk Audio DAC-Q11 together!
I commend you for attempting provide the curious consumer with a different product, at a reasonable price, and apparently w/decent specs. :)
Some users may get benefits as a "training" (NOT an A/B comparo) device; to possibly distinguish/differentiate sound impact of 2 different chips.
Some other users may get a benefit from such a device for a second zone.

I consider it a BOGO!
 
  • Like
Reactions: EJ3
Apples and Oranges. Or, DAC Chips and water, if you will.

I honestly don't see why.

Both are designed to pass something on uncontaminated, and both do that task so exceedingly well, that human senses have no chance of detecting the remnants.
 
This should be a great tool for people to find out for themselves whether different DAC chips sound different. A much better way to learn rather then being told or even mocked for wanting to know. The griping about this product by some people is pathetic. Hopefully, the outputs are matched though.
You cant as they deliberately designed the product with slightly different output levels for each DAC chip ;) for some reason...
 
You cant as they deliberately designed the product with slightly different output levels for each DAC chip ;) for some reason...
The whole thing was/is a great idea EXCEPT for the slightly different output levels for each DAC chip.
 
I honestly don't see why.

Both are designed to pass something on uncontaminated, and both do that task so exceedingly well, that human senses have no chance of detecting the remnants.
so, if that is the case, why do individual Companies make different DAC chips?
 
so, if that is the case, why do individual Companies make different DAC chips?
I heard some gossip that a nameless company is readying their pumpkin-spice DAC for release before Halloween 2024! :cool:
 
I heard some gossip that a nameless company is readying their pumpkin-spice DAC for release before Halloween 2024! :cool:

ESS SABRE 8-channel DACs​

Search
Product NameDatasheet/ Product BriefDNR per ChannelDNR in Stereo ModeTHD+NPackageModulatorDAC Output ResistanceHardware ModeTDM ModeComments
ES9017Datasheet120dB124dB-110dB48-LQFP/ QFNHyperstream IV1563ΩYESYESPin/footprint compatible ES9027PRO
ES9080Datasheet120dB124dB-108dB40-QFNHyperstream IINANOYES2Vrms output with 8Ch line drivers
ES9018Datasheet129dB133dB-120dB64-LQFPHyperstream-NONO
SABRE9006ADatasheet120dB--102dB48-LQFPNA-NONO
ES9039PRODatasheet132dB138dB-122dB64-TQFPQuad, Hyperstream IV195ΩYESYESMQA renderer option
ES9038PRODatasheet132dB138dB-122dB64-TQFPHyperstream II202ΩNONO
ES9028PRODatasheet129dB133dB-120dB64-TQFPHyperstream II806ΩNONO
ES9027PRODatasheet124dB128dB-114dB48-TQFP/ QFNDual, Hyperstream IV760ΩYESYESPin/footprint compatible ES9017
ES9026PRODatasheet124dB--113dB48-LQFPHyperstream II806ΩNONO

ESS SABRE 2-Channel DACs​

Search
Product NameDatasheet/ Product BriefDNR per ChannelDNR in Stereo ModeTHD+NPackageModulatorDAC Output ResistanceHardware ModeTDM ModeComments
ES9020
New50x50.png
Datasheet122dB122dB-110dB28-QFNHyperstream IV1050ΩYESYESAPLL
ES9039Q2M
New50x50.png
Datasheet130dB130dB-120dB32-QFNHyperstream IV390ΩYESYES
ES9038Q2MDatasheet129dB129dB-120dB30-QFNHyperstream II774ΩNONO
ES9028Q2MDatasheet129dB129dB-120dB32-QFNHyperstream403ΩNONO
ES9018K2MDatasheet127dB127dB-120dB28-QFNHyperstream806ΩNONO
ES9018C2MProduct Brief127dB127dB-120dB25-WLCSPHyperstream-NONO
ES9016K2MDatasheet122dB122dB-110dB28-QFNHyperstream806ΩNONO
ES9010K2MDatasheet116dB116dB-106dB28-QFNHyperstream806ΩNONO
ES9069
New50x50.png
Datasheet130dB130dB-120dB32-QFNHyperstream IV390ΩYESYESMQA Renderer
ES9068ASProduct Brief129dB129dB-120dB64-LQFPHyperstream II781ΩNONOWith Mic ADC & MQA Renderer
ES9033QDatasheet122dB122dB-108dB28-QFNHyperstream IINAYESYES2Vrms output with line drivers
ES9023PDatasheet112dB112dB-94dB16-SOPHyperstreamNANONO2Vrms output with line drivers
 

ESS SABRE 8-channel DACs​

Search
Product NameDatasheet/ Product BriefDNR per ChannelDNR in Stereo ModeTHD+NPackageModulatorDAC Output ResistanceHardware ModeTDM ModeComments
ES9017Datasheet120dB124dB-110dB48-LQFP/ QFNHyperstream IV1563ΩYESYESPin/footprint compatible ES9027PRO
ES9080Datasheet120dB124dB-108dB40-QFNHyperstream IINANOYES2Vrms output with 8Ch line drivers
ES9018Datasheet129dB133dB-120dB64-LQFPHyperstream-NONO
SABRE9006ADatasheet120dB--102dB48-LQFPNA-NONO
ES9039PRODatasheet132dB138dB-122dB64-TQFPQuad, Hyperstream IV195ΩYESYESMQA renderer option
ES9038PRODatasheet132dB138dB-122dB64-TQFPHyperstream II202ΩNONO
ES9028PRODatasheet129dB133dB-120dB64-TQFPHyperstream II806ΩNONO
ES9027PRODatasheet124dB128dB-114dB48-TQFP/ QFNDual, Hyperstream IV760ΩYESYESPin/footprint compatible ES9017
ES9026PRODatasheet124dB--113dB48-LQFPHyperstream II806ΩNONO

ESS SABRE 2-Channel DACs​

Search
Product NameDatasheet/ Product BriefDNR per ChannelDNR in Stereo ModeTHD+NPackageModulatorDAC Output ResistanceHardware ModeTDM ModeComments
ES9020
New50x50.png
Datasheet122dB122dB-110dB28-QFNHyperstream IV1050ΩYESYESAPLL
ES9039Q2M
New50x50.png
Datasheet130dB130dB-120dB32-QFNHyperstream IV390ΩYESYES
ES9038Q2MDatasheet129dB129dB-120dB30-QFNHyperstream II774ΩNONO
ES9028Q2MDatasheet129dB129dB-120dB32-QFNHyperstream403ΩNONO
ES9018K2MDatasheet127dB127dB-120dB28-QFNHyperstream806ΩNONO
ES9018C2MProduct Brief127dB127dB-120dB25-WLCSPHyperstream-NONO
ES9016K2MDatasheet122dB122dB-110dB28-QFNHyperstream806ΩNONO
ES9010K2MDatasheet116dB116dB-106dB28-QFNHyperstream806ΩNONO
ES9069
New50x50.png
Datasheet130dB130dB-120dB32-QFNHyperstream IV390ΩYESYESMQA Renderer
ES9068ASProduct Brief129dB129dB-120dB64-LQFPHyperstream II781ΩNONOWith Mic ADC & MQA Renderer
ES9033QDatasheet122dB122dB-108dB28-QFNHyperstream IINAYESYES2Vrms output with line drivers
ES9023PDatasheet112dB112dB-94dB16-SOPHyperstreamNANONO2Vrms output with line drivers
which one of those is the pumpkin Spice?
 
so, if that is the case, why do individual Companies make different DAC chips?

Same reason there's a million different tool companies making hammers.

Just because a problem is solved, doesn't mean a monopoly will automatically emerge.

Marketing usually has its focus on a ton of other things than real world objective performance. There's always a niche to dig into.

Seriously, a good implementation of a modern SOTA DAC chip keeps all of the undesirable effects at -120dB or lower. That's 0.0001% of the desired signal.

Anybody, who thinks that this percentage combined with their immaculate hearing is enough to give a "sound signature", are just plain delusional. No offence :)
 
for me there's acclimatisation period for a dac

i have units from AKM ESS CS and you run them for a while and you get used to the sound - they're all pretty much transparent for our uses

for this douk unit you're going to be happy with the AKM and the ESS when you increase the vol to match but i suppose many people here are super opposed to this device
 
Back
Top Bottom