• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Does anyone else like FM radio?

Some people here have mentioned the BBC. In Australia we have sort of the equivalent, ABC FM. It has a whole bunch of stations, each dedicated to a fairly defined (however broad) audience. Like - sports, jazz, country, youth radio (? any age?), news, kids, regional, etc.

I often listen to the Classic station. Sometimes all the time. Excellent reception - helped a bit by an FM omni antenna attached to the TV antenna stem. No advertisements, some chat and interviews, but mostly music. Sometimes live performances. The presenters are invariably quite erudite, sometimes musicians, and sometimes classically trained.

Unlike commercial stations, I can't hear that the audio is modified much outside of what is perhaps necessary for FM broadcast. Spoken voices are modulated/equalised somehow. I can only listen to commercial FM in the car where there is so much noise and distractions anyway. Blah!

My tuner is a Yamaha T-85, which is about 40 years old but I picked it up a few years ago NOS (still in the unopened box) for a few hundred bucks. I haven't seen one since offered for sale in Australia - maybe I blinked. Despite not appearing on that shootout list which, like others, I find a little bit cringeworthy, it is nevertheless quite highly regarded at that site. Whatever that means.

I also have a recently professionally overhauled NAD 7220PE. It is what it is - with inbuilt amp. I bet it has a whole bunch of audible harmonics and who knows what else. After quite a period of initial enthusiasm, it now remains unplugged, sigh. I'll give it to a sibling.

Perhaps on my wish list - dreams? - is perhaps a new Magnum Dynalab. Only three models available here - all with 90 in their model name. Some pretty good provided measurements, plus 600 ohms balanced output which is kinda interesting. Others here have mentioned MD, perhaps in passing.
 
Last edited:
Some people here have mentioned the BBC. In Australia we have sort of the equivalent, ABC FM. It has a whole bunch of stations, each dedicated to a fairly defined (however broad) audience. Like - sports, jazz, country, youth radio (? any age?), news, kids, regional, etc.

I often listen to the Classic station. Sometimes all the time. Excellent reception - helped a bit by an FM omni antenna attached to the TV antenna stem. No advertisements, some chat and interviews, but mostly music. Sometimes live performances. The presenters are invariably quite erudite, sometimes musicians, and sometimes classically trained.

My tuner is a Yamaha T-85, which is about 40 years old but I picked it up a few years ago NOS (still in the unopened box) for a few hundred bucks. I haven't seen one since offered for sale in Australia - maybe I blinked. Despite not appearing on that shootout list which, like others, I find a little bit cringeworthy, it is nevertheless quite highly regarded at that site. Whatever that means.
It appears that the T-85 can be quite an incredibly good tuner with a few mods (EJ3):

Yamaha CSL notes - T-85 mods​


Copyright ©2001-2023 Tuner Information Center. Permission is hereby granted to quote our text so long as proper credit is given.
Yamaha T-85

(1986, $500/orig $449, photo, closeup, owner's manual, ad, service manual: schematic 1, schematic 2, front-end schematic, adjustments, circuit boards 1, circuit boards 2, remote and CSL, wiring and ICs) search eBay
The T-85 is a black-faced digital tuner with good sensitivity and, some say, better audio quality than its main competitors as digital "DX machines," the Onkyo T-9090 and T-9090II. The T-85 has the electronic equivalent of 5 gangs and 4 IF bandwidth settings (Super Wide-Wide-Narrow-Super Narrow), and tunes in .1 MHz increments or fine-tunes in .01 MHz (10 kHz) increments. The ability to detune from strong local stations, together with the T-85's excellent overload rejection, leads some urban DXers to prefer it to the Onkyo T-9090 or T-9090II once the T-85's stock ceramic filters are replaced with narrower ones. The problem for DXers, or others who change stations frequently, is that the T-85's "CSL" (Computer Servo Lock) function requires one to hit the fine-tuning button every time a weak station is manually tuned (whether or not you actually want to fine-tune), in order to defeat the CSL's muting of weak signals. This means that it takes two button-pushes, rather than one, to tune a weak signal, except for those frequencies that have been entered as presets. See our panelist Bob's definitive writeup on the operation of the CSL circuit in the series of posts beginning here, and there's more on the CSL in the string of posts here.

Our contributor Bill Ammons offers this technical analysis: "The T-85's RF front end/IF converter is on its own PCB. The RF section has two tuning gangs before the 3SK107 FET. The IF converter is a balanced mixer using two 2SK107 FETs. In the Super Wide mode, the IF consists of two tuned 10.7 stages plus two amplitude adjustments and two 280 kHz ceramic filters. The Wide mode adds one additional 10.7 tuned stage, another amplitude adjustment, and one more ceramic filter. The Narrow mode adds one additional 230 kHz filter to the preceding IF. And in the Super Narrow position, a second 230 kHz filter is added for a total of 5 ceramic filters in the Super Narrow IF chain. This unit is easy to service or modify, but the CSL circuit is even more tricky here than in the TX-900 when it comes to grabbing stations 200 kHz apart."

Some complain about the T-85's ergonomics, but our contributor Ryan notes that it is an underrated audiophile tuner: "Yamaha used a true analog multiplier in the multiplex. The technical description of the multiplex is complex, but suffice to say this is one of the very best ways to decode a stereo signal, but because it costs more than using just one simple chip, it wasn't done frequently. Even in stock form, the T-85 is very good, and I suspect that with carefully matched filters and a few component changes almost nothing could touch it. But of course, it is filter and alignment dependent on what you end up with, as with any tuner. Overall, however, Yamaha made very few mistakes with this tuner, and it's certainly one of the best overall designs ever, in my opinion." Our contributor Charles found one or two mistakes: "One thing I don't like about the T-85's 'auto-mode' IF band selection is that it always seems to go to a narrower bandwidth than I would select. Also, once it goes down to a narrower bandwidth (say, if there's some temporary interference), it never bothers to go back up again, so there's an annoying 'downward ratcheting' effect. On my favorite presets, I defeat the auto-bandwidth."

Our contributor Eli says, "Although it has a reputation as a great DX tuner, there are quite a few tuners with greater selectivity than the T-85 [in stock form]. The T-85's alternate channel selectivity is 90 dB, which is decent, but (in my experience) not quite enough to reliably separate stations that are adjacent (200 kHz away) to stronger local stations. It's sufficient in many cases, but not in all cases. Many of the digital Onkyos will beat it, as will the MR 78, MR 80, a couple of Accuphase models, and some of the top Kenwoods. And the Sony HD tuner will make mincemeat out of it for selectivity. The T-85 needs narrower filters installed in order to compete with the best on selectivity. Its stock filters are a mix of 280 kHz and 230 kHz. In comparison, the Onkyo T-9090II has *5* 150 kHz filters in its Super Narrow mode. All that being said, the T-85 is one of my favorite tuners, maybe even my all-around #1, all things considered. But I just don't want people to go out and buy one expecting super selectivity in stock form." Eli also praises the T-85's AM performance on the AM Tuners page.

Our contributor Mark modded his T-85 and says, "Performance-wise, the T-85 is amazing. I just finished aligning it and I'm getting over 60 dB of separation at 1 kHz in Super Wide (@.05% distortion) and 50 dB in Wide (@.08% distortion). There are actually separate separation adjustments for L-only and R-only modes in both Super Wide and Wide. Plus the T-85 plays my weak-signal stereo test station (in Super Narrow with the 2 180 kHz GDT filters) BETTER than the RSPdx DSP receiver! That is a first. I wish it had a nice, weighted tuning knob."

Our contributor János compares a T-85 to a Kenwood KT-6040 in our writeup for the latter. János wondered whether the T-85 is bass-shy, to which our panelist JohnC responds: "The T-85's bass can be improved with the replacement of C279 and C280 with 10 µF bipolar capacitors, something like a Nichicon Muse ES series. You can even push it up to 22 µF if you feel comfortable with that." JohnC's full mod recipe for the T-85 can be found on our DIY Mods page

Our contributor Tim comments on the above writeup and compares a modded T-85 to a couple of other top modded tuners on our Shootouts 2.0 page. Our contributor Ken K. compares a T-85 to an Onkyo T-4711 in our writeup for the latter, and our contributor Bill C. compares a T-85 to a JVC FX-1100BK in our writeup for the JVC. The T-85's 75-ohm coax jack requires a push-on F-connector, such as Radio Shack catalog #2780291. T-85 sale prices on eBay can be highly variable: anything from $150 to $350 is usually possible, with lows of $100 in 6/09 and $101 in 7/11. All-time highs were $430 and $440 for mint ones in 1-3/06. The clear lesson (as with the T-1) is not to overpay: The T-85 is extremely common and if the price of one gets too high, another one will be along shortly.

The T-85 is worthy of some extra space, so here is some additional detailed information from Yamaha:
"The T-85 Natural Sound AM/FM Stereo Tuner incorporates the most advanced Yamaha tuner technology, making it the uncompromising choice for truly discriminating audio enthusiasts. The T-85 combines a number of proven Yamaha technologies and original features with sophisticated innovations that make it a reference standard in terms of sound quality, reception accuracy and operating ease.
CSL Achieves Exceptional Linearity and Low Noise Throughout Entire Band
The new Computer Servo Lock Tuning (CSL) system achieves stunning levels of performance in the T-85. First and foremost, it provides ideal reception performance under virtually any signal conditions. Also, the design of this system ensures that the tuning voltage itself is completely unaffected by noise from the PLL stage, so the signal-to-noise ratio of the local oscillator depends only on the inherent noise characteristics of the parts making up the local oscillator circuitry. These, of course, have been painstakingly selected to ensure an absolute minimum of noise. The overall result is a remarkably high signal-to-noise ratio across the entire 87.5 to 108.0 MHz band (98 dB mono, 90 dB stereo), with unprecedented linearity throughout the same range.
Four Different Tuning Modes
The T-85 offers auto-search and manual tuning in addition to the preset and fine tuning functions. In the Auto Search mode, the tuner scans the band in the specified Up or Down direction until a strong station is found. In the Manual mode, single-step tuning makes it possible to tune to a station's exact frequency for easy tuning of even weak broadcasts.
20-Station Random Access Preset Tuning
Up to 20 different station frequencies can be stored in memory for instant, accurate tuning at the touch of a button. Any combination of AM and FM stations can be programmed. To tune in a preset station, simply touch the appropriate button and the station will be precisely tuned immediately, for real operating ease and convenience. Station frequency indicator cards are supplied, so you can label your presets for faster, easier station selection.
Station Status Memory
When you enter a particular station into the T-85's preset memory, a few more factors than just the station's frequency are memorized. The tuner remembers whether the Auto Stereo or Mono mode was set, whether the Dynamic Auto Blend function was on or off, whether the Direct or Normal RF mode was selected, whether any manual fine tuning was employed, and which of the four possible IF modes was selected. That way, all necessary parameters for optimum station reception are recalled simultaneously with the station's frequency whenever the preset memory is used.
Last Channel Memory
This handy feature eliminates the need to retune your favorite station each time you turn the power on. When power to the T-85 is switched on, the last station tuned in before the power was turned off is automatically re-selected.
12-Segment Signal Quality Meter
This easy-to-read meter provides an accurate reading of overall signal quality, making it easy to achieve the best possible reception with the manual and digital fine tuning functions. This metering system provides a truly meaningful indication of not just signal strength, but actual signal quality, so that the highest display reading shows the optimum blend of signal strength and signal purity. This is especially helpful when tuning manually with the digital fine tuning control, since it gives a visual indication of the desired tuning point in addition to confirmation by ear.
Dynamic Auto Blend Circuit
When signal quality is low, stereo programs tend to lose quality and suffer increased distortion and noise more than monaural programs do. This special circuit compensates for this by automatically blending the left and right channels of a stereo program when signal quality drops below the limit of acceptable sound quality. The result is greatly reduced noise and distortion with enhanced intelligibility on programs that would otherwise be unlistenable. This circuit is 'dynamic,' too, automatically providing the optimum degree of blend for the prevailing signal conditions."

Yamaha CSL notes - T-85 mods:​

12/26/21: JohnC's holiday special kicks off with a comprehensive DIY mod for the superb Yamaha T-85.

All decoupling and power supply caps, Panasonic FR, FM, Nichicon HE, or Panasonic FC in that order, as available, unless noted.

Front End Board
C124 - 1200/16
C130 - 22/25
C132 - 47/25

Detector
C253 - 68/25

Composite/MPX
C259/260 - 1500/16
C261/262 - 1200/16

MPX PLL
C329/330 - 68/25

Audio
C279/280 - 10/50 Nichicon MUSE ES bipolar

Power Mute
C343 - 150/25
C344 - 330/25

Power Supply
C362/363 - 1200/35

-12V Rail
C354 - 22/25
C356 - 47/25
C358 - 1500/35

6V Rail
C353 - 22/25
C355 - 100/25
C357 - 4700/35

8V Rail
C350/351 - 22/25
C352 - 100/25

+12V Rail
C348 - 220/16
C349 - 100/16

30V Rail
C346 - 47/50
C347 - 47/63
C359 - 47/63

Replacement DIP-8 Op-Amp Orientation
IC 203 - Pin 8 into board hole 1
IC 204 - Pin 8 into board hole 9
IC 205 - Pin 8 into board hole 9
IC 210 - Pin 8 into board hole 9 with a jumper between board holes 1 and 9

A while back, when discussing the Yamaha T-85 in our FMtuners group was a hot topic, I dragged mine out to take a second look at the re-cap recipe and see what could be done about the ICs in the signal path. Actually the re-cap is a pretty straightforward operation with only one cap in the signal path, a bipolar near the output, leaving the power supply and decoupling locations left. I added the three caps used for voltage regulation and buffering on the front end board to the list and left the rest as previously changed. This left the four op-amps after the detector in the signal path, specifically ICs 203, 204, 205 and 210. The main issue at this point was that those ICs are 9-pin SIPs, not the typical 8-pin units. The schematic, at least the one I have, calls them NJM2041S and NJM2043S ICs. The IC block diagram indicates that they are all NJM2068S ICs, which are what are actually installed on the board. Also of note is that all these ICs are powered in balanced mode, a good thing IMHO. The search for an adapter board for 9-pin SIPs to 8-pin DIPs was less than successful, but in reviewing the block diagram it turns out that pins 1 and 9 are both V+ with an internal bridge connecting them together. Additionally, the pinout function sequence actually matches the typical 8-pin DIP configuration when installed with DIP pin 8 (V+) installed in wherever V+ is in the tuner board. In looking for a now easy-to-find adapter, Cimarron Technologies has one, but I wasn't too happy with the pins themselves and continued the search. I found this on eBay and they seemed to be well-built, plus there were additional solder pads for bypass caps on both V+/- and ground wire. They are also configured for both DIP and SOIC op-amps.

To make a long story short, using these adapters and OPA2134 op-amps with 0.01 µF bypass caps on V+/- all 4 OEM ICs were replaced. In looking at the board itself you will see that ICs 203, 204 and 205 only use ONE of the V+ pins which allows you to orient pin 8 on the adapter to wherever V+ is on the board. IC 210 is a little different in that it's powered off pin 9, but pin 1 is used as a passthrough to the PLL mono switch. So after you install the 8-pin adapter, you need to add a jumper from board through hole 9 to board through hole 1 which sends V+ power to Q264 and 265 through R439. In the OEM SIP9 installation, this connection is provided internally through the IC.

The adapter board has a nice, clean conformal coating and all solder pads were tinned. The addition of the bypass caps pads for V+/- and ground were laid out well, short lead on the hot side, convenient and easy to implement.

Right now the T-85 has about 100 hours on it and sounds pretty darn good, definitely better than factory, a touch quieter, though the Yammies are pretty quiet to begin with. The ICs were changed out one at a time and, to these aging ears, changing IC203 seemed to make the largest improvement, though all have an impact to some degree. If I were doing this for someone else or were interested in rolling different op-amps, I'd use sockets for the DIPs, at least on 210, which is the audio output op-amp. Don't forget the 3 'lytics in the front end voltage regulator/buffer.

You may also want to look at the mod in message #81890 in our FMtuners group which will allow the CSL and stereo to work at very low signal levels, and don't forget to read Bob's discussion beginning here about how the CSL works and its impact on reception. Lastly, if you're having to deal with an HD-encoded signal, the T-85 seems to recognize this as noise and you will see the 'Signal Quality' drop as you increase the IF bandwidth. If anyone wants additional info for the re-cap or the op-amp-ectomy, feel free to post a request in the group. Regards, JohnC"

newaag
2/18/18 #81890
Here is the CSL Mod for the T-85, originally posted here by Ryan H. in message # 20230
This mod will allow CSL and stereo to work at very low signal levels, and overcome a lot of the hassles identified below.
I posted this a couple days ago, but it apparently got lost in the Yahoo system. Maybe it will show up tomorrow
Lately posting messages here are like sending a letter via US Mail.

"All you have to do is cut a jumper wire on the top of the PCB. Find
VR213 just above the right CSL IC chip on the front left section of
the tuner. To the right of VR213, snip the long vertical jumper
wire. It is the long one, not the short one. These instruction
were given to me courtesy of Steve McVie, and they do work. What
you are doing (if I recall the circuit correctly) is taking the FM
Noise amp out of the circuit. I traced out the TX-1000/2000 by hand
to work out the same thing, and can get that info as well if anyone
needs it.
Regards,
Ryan"

---In FMtuners@..., <rick.savas@...> wrote :

On the T-85, in auto search mode, it always wants to select the lowest IF bandwidth settings. search is basically a useless feature, apart from finding a strong signal, since it never really determines the optimum setting for the station. I guess they ran out of code space or did not bother to refine the algorithms ;-)
Does your signal indicator flip around the higher % leds? as an indication of multi-path or varying sig strength like it does on the T-85?

Also on the T-85, CSL only comes on when I get a signal ~>20%. With a fair bit of multi-path, it will flip CSL off, which is annoying, so I select fine tune, to defeat CSL, thankfully it never turns CSL back on, when in fine tuning mode. I did notice that it also wants to select mono, so I have to select very narrow filter to enable stereo again and then re-select the narrow filter, if I select wide it shuts off stereo again, since the signal level being displayed drops as well.

Rick Savas
2/18/18 #81892
Thanks for the info, so assumption is that it is the connection to R493(1M). I am going to have a look at that signal from the noise amp to see how it operates.

newaag
2/18/18 #81904
Never really went into great detail studying what it did, or why. But did it on my T-85, and TX-1000 and loved the way it allows CSL and stereo for low level RF signals. If you can give more details, that would be super.
Bob

---In FMtuners@..., <rick.savas@...> wrote :
Thanks for the info, so assumption is that it is the connection to R493(1M). I am going to have a look at that signal from the noise amp to see how it operates.

[email protected]
2/20/18 #81910
I have simulated the Yamaha noise circuit. It looks at noise in the detected signal above 90-100 kHz or so (I don't remember the cutoff frequency exactly). Since the bandwidth of an FM signal is 53 kHz, an output from the filter circuit indicates noise due to a weak received signal.
Don

[email protected]
2/21/18 #81915
That mod appears to open up the connection of the noise detection circuit to the processor. So it should trick the processor into thinking the received signal is never noisy.
newaag
2/21/18 #81916
That also where significant IBOC sideband power lies, above 100 kHz.
Bob

 
I’m bringing this one back from graveyard.

Just moved to a rural location and looking to experiment with some tuners. Mostly to be able to keep up with what’s going on in the community while in the background while I do things around the house.

Thinking of getting an Onkyo T-4087 because I think I can get it for $50 or less. What is it likely to need if it had neither been ideally cared for over the years nor abused?
 
I’m bringing this one back from graveyard.

Just moved to a rural location and looking to experiment with some tuners. Mostly to be able to keep up with what’s going on in the community while in the background while I do things around the house.

Thinking of getting an Onkyo T-4087 because I think I can get it for $50 or less. What is it likely to need if it had neither been ideally cared for over the years nor abused?
Does anyone actually broadcast on radio anymore?
I think internet radio would be far more productive for you.
 
Does anyone actually broadcast on radio anymore?
Based on your comment, not in your area or country it seems... but yes, FM is still widely broadcast in many countries. I was just listening to the radio in the car on the way home... which was AM actually. The stations here broadcast and also simulcast via online streams, plus the national broadcaster is still relied upon as a conduit for emergency information during storms, floods and fires etc.


JSmith
 
  • Like
Reactions: EJ3
I’m bringing this one back from graveyard.

Just moved to a rural location and looking to experiment with some tuners. Mostly to be able to keep up with what’s going on in the community while in the background while I do things around the house.

Thinking of getting an Onkyo T-4087 because I think I can get it for $50 or less. What is it likely to need if it had neither been ideally cared for over the years nor abused?
It may not need anything! And I think it would be a good choice. Onkyo made some excellent tuners both in radio terms (sensitivity selectivity, etc.) and in audio terms. Sort of an open secret in the hobby, back in their day. :)
 
I’m bringing this one back from graveyard.

Just moved to a rural location and looking to experiment with some tuners. Mostly to be able to keep up with what’s going on in the community while in the background while I do things around the house.

Thinking of getting an Onkyo T-4087 because I think I can get it for $50 or less. What is it likely to need if it had neither been ideally cared for over the years nor abused?
Looked into the service manual and found that it has a good FM front end. Intermediate frequency part has fixed bandfilters, nothing to adjust. My opinion is that if it works nothing needs to be done.
 
Based on your comment, not in your area or country it seems... but yes, FM is still widely broadcast in many countries. I was just listening to the radio in the car on the way home... which was AM actually. The stations here broadcast and also simulcast via online streams, plus the national broadcaster is still relied upon as a conduit for emergency information during storms, floods and fires etc.


JSmith
Well that's my point tbh.
Any broadcast these days is likely to be on a stream (especially anything community)
I'm ignoring HAM/CB radios, i think that is not the point here.

FM is awful. Always was. Any stream is going to be a zillion times better than any radio.
Can you even get decent radio sets these days? And are all the old ones knackered/aged out?
 
Well that's my point tbh.
Any broadcast these days is likely to be on a stream (especially anything community)
I'm ignoring HAM/CB radios, i think that is not the point here.

FM is awful. Always was. Any stream is going to be a zillion times better than any radio.
Can you even get decent radio sets these days? And are all the old ones knackered/aged out?
I guess that you have no clue that many of us live where streaming, cell signals & Wifi can't happen. Nor do we want it to.
The bandwidth is to narrow. At my home (in the USA, by the way) you can stand outside, on the deck, in a certain spot and get a cell phone signal. Until you move enough that you talk, then you lose it.
Please, if you have ZERO to contribute to actually answer the question (which you have already demonstrated that you have ZERO desire to answer with anything intelligent (and by even asking about old ones being knackered out, you are also demonstrating that you are not proficient on the subject: Perhaps you should M(ind) Y(our O(wn) B(usiness) about things that you do not care for and don't know about.
 
I guess that you have no clue that many of us live where streaming, cell signals & Wifi can't happen. Nor do we want it to.
The bandwidth is to narrow. At my home (in the USA, by the way) you can stand outside, on the deck, in a certain spot and get a cell phone signal. Until you move enough that you talk, then you lose it.
Please, if you have ZERO to contribute to actually answer the question (which you have already demonstrated that you have ZERO desire to answer with anything intelligent (and by even asking about old ones being knackered out, you are also demonstrating that you are not proficient on the subject: Perhaps you should M(ind) Y(our O(wn) B(usiness) about things that you do not care for and don't know about.
Streaming can't happen?
How are you posting on the internet then?

Perhaps you don't understand technology very well. It would compute with you flying a flag for a dead and defunct technology.
 
ONLY for political talk radio... Otherwise, I stream at home and on the road.
 


We listen to Vermont's excellent public radio 'network' daily via broadcast (FM). Easier than streaming. Push a button, and voila! -- radio. :)
The antenna for their transmitter closest to us is atop nearby Mt. Ascutney (a "monadnock" and the tallest free-standing mountain east of the Mississippi) and reception here is optimal.



In a pinch (i.e., if that transmitter goes down) we can pick up their Burlington, VT station (antenna atop Mt. Mansfield, Vermont's tallest peak :)) with good signal quality. Their music programming (including a network of all 'classical' music stations as well as their "news plus music" network) is generally excellent in quality and the broadcast audio quality is also excellent.

1774618200664.png

1774618183040.png



Access to broadband internet is spotty at best in many rural areas in VT in particular, but also here in New Hampshire. The terrain also makes cell reception very spotty as well. Terrestrial radio is still essential for tens of thousands of people in northeastern New England.

Access to "TV" is a lost cause for many in this part of the world after the changeover to HD digital broadcasting and the resulting "digital cliff" in reception -- but that's another story. ;)
 


We listen to Vermont's excellent public radio 'network' daily via broadcast (FM). Easier than streaming. Push a button, and voila! -- radio. :)
The antenna for their transmitter closest to us is atop nearby Mt. Ascutney (a "monadnock" and the tallest free-standing mountain east of the Mississippi) and reception here is optimal.



In a pinch (i.e., if that transmitter goes down) we can pick up their Burlington, VT station (antenna atop Mt. Mansfield, Vermont's tallest peak :)) with good signal quality. Their music programming (including a network of all 'classical' music stations as well as their "news plus music" network) is generally excellent in quality and the broadcast audio quality is also excellent.

View attachment 520649
View attachment 520648


Access to broadband internet is spotty at best in many rural areas in VT in particular, but also here in New Hampshire. The terrain also makes cell reception very spotty as well. Terrestrial radio is still essential for tens of thousands of people in northeastern New England.

Access to "TV" is a lost cause for many in this part of the world after the changeover to HD digital broadcasting and the resulting "digital cliff" in reception -- but that's another story. ;)

My thoughts on FM as requested by the OP are obviously personal, as are yours. I don't think we need to add "in my experience" to every comment made on the forum.

You post is obviously pertinent to your own situation and in remote areas where internet is spotty or non existent, you likely have better radio services.

In my location and country, Internet is widely available and at worst, mobile internet is available where cable isn't and even then, satellite internet is easily available. Maybe not GB bandwidth but not poor by any means.

Actual radio here (Europe) is dying so badly that even the rds and DAT services have been switched off. You have the big stations still playing of course but Android Auto and Apple Carplay are becoming the norm.

Personally, I've always been very disappointed with any radio services including FM. I had a decent Panasonic tuner years ago but never bothered with it for HIfi. My Google nest speakers do my "radio" services these days and does an excellent job when I want to listen to classic or classical radio around the house.

I can't remember the last time I actually saw a proper FM tuner module for sale. It would seem to me that any real radio equipment is just a module stuck onto a music box. Your Yamaha (looks splendid) being an exception.

So I stand by my opinion (as is my want) and as requested by the OP and respect others should they differ (yours being good post tbh).

Electronics don't mature. They age. Badly.
Yes, you can always try to keep them alive and have some success in doing so but you can't fight entropy forever. Good luck finding techs who can or have the equipment to properly repair or service radios these days. DIY is always an option but that's not the point here tbh.

Nice pics. You live in a beautiful part of the world!
 
Streaming can't happen?
How are you posting on the internet then?

Perhaps you don't understand technology very well. It would compute with you flying a flag for a dead and defunct technology.
Apparently: you don't seem to realize that people can be mobile. Or have more than one place. Or even more places.
I'm in my place in the city at the moment, not at home.
Maybe you understand new tech (I don't know, you've only proven that you don't understand the current usefulness of old tech).
But you don't seem to understand that new tech does not work everywhere.
Where I live (as opposed to where I have a place in the city) is one place it doesn't work. And due to the forest overhead, satellite signals also don't work:
IMG_2173.JPG
 
I’m bringing this one back from graveyard.

Just moved to a rural location and looking to experiment with some tuners. Mostly to be able to keep up with what’s going on in the community while in the background while I do things around the house.

Thinking of getting an Onkyo T-4087 because I think I can get it for $50 or less. What is it likely to need if it had neither been ideally cared for over the years nor abused?
It does depend on how good an aerial you have and nowadays people have forgotten you need one ;)

Before CD the best quality classical music audio I could get at home was BBC Radio 3 live broadcasts and with my excellent aerial the tuner connected to my home stereo still gives good audio on Radio 3 live broadcasts, but there aren't as many any more - they used to be every evening.

If you are only listening to voice or narrow dynamic range pop the SQ is less important and maybe even a smart speaker would be sort of acceptable - my grandchildren have no interest in better quality than their smart speaker or headphones it seems and they are happy with them.
 
Actual radio here (Europe) is dying so badly that even the rds and DAT services have been switched off. You have the big stations still playing of course but Android Auto and Apple Carplay are becoming the norm.
The crappy sound of DAT (at least here) and the extra advertising it allowed damn near killed FM in the USA.
But I have 36 channels of over the air HDTV at my location, many, many FM stations (I have orer 100 KM of reception ability).
You mention Europe: I have a place in Salzburg, Austria (where I was born [I was concieved in Charleston, SC] {and raised about 15% in Europe}). But I have not been to that place since 1996.
At my Austrian mother's home (about 55 KM from mine), she listens to FM or her Austrian Folk music LP's or DVD's, Blue Ray's & 4K of all sorts.
 
Last edited:
Apparently: you don't seem to realize that people can be mobile. Or have more than one place. Or even more places.
I'm in my place in the city at the moment, not at home.
Maybe you understand new tech (I don't know, you've only proven that you don't understand the current usefulness of old tech).
But you don't seem to understand that new tech does not work everywhere.
Where I live (as opposed to where I have a place in the city) is one place it doesn't work. And due to the forest overhead, satellite signals also don't work:
View attachment 520655

You are kinda making my argument for me tbh.

The Yamaha receiver above is technically defunct in my country now. There is no AM broadcasting anymore.Gone.
What FM is still available is legacy only.

You live in the arse end of nowhere (lovely spot mind you) and the only accessory you have to the outside world there is a legacy FM antenna you happen to be lucky enough to be in the range of.
A few miles down the road and you'd be silent.
Yours is a very niche situation.

I'd ask you if you prefer listening to a radio station via FM over internet when you return to the world of civilization but I suspect you'll say the former given you said in your last post that you don't like WiFi
Quite the luddite statement to make given the nature of this forum.
 
It does depend on how good an aerial you have and nowadays people have forgotten you need one ;)

Before CD the best quality classical music audio I could get at home was BBC Radio 3 live broadcasts and with my excellent aerial the tuner connected to my home stereo still gives good audio on Radio 3 live broadcasts, but there aren't as many any more - they used to be every evening.

If you are only listening to voice or narrow dynamic range pop the SQ is less important and maybe even a smart speaker would be sort of acceptable - my grandchildren have no interest in better quality than their smart speaker or headphones it seems and they are happy with them.
Yes, I wonder, will today's children appreciate the good hearing that they had when they were young.
My mother played records for me at least as far back as when I was 4 (probably sooner, that I don't recall).
I started my stereo gear journey when I was 14 but got serious about it when I was 17. Back then, I found the 19KZ buzzing from a CRT TV set annoying. Today (at 69 years old and in good shape), I have a total blank from 7KHz to 8KHz in my right ear and overall can't hear above 14KHz.
There are certain things that I would have used hearing protection for, had I understood the truth of what happens to ones hearing due to the excessive noise (particularly as a teen & race cars and later on at work with huge vehicles (some that were turbine powered).
 
Back
Top Bottom