To avoid circular arguments, I'll let this one go
. I'll agree that I know only what I have perceived. - While apparently the measurements appear to know even less of what I perceive.
(Sorry, had to slip that one in there!
)
I like that test. I don't think I've done that one. But I have performed (non blind) tests to try to identify between mp3 and wav. - Above 160 kbps at least
The answer it's very hard to distinguish between the two. I don't think I could reliably differentiate in a test like that especially because I couldn't differentiate in a sighted A/B comparison
The reality is that the biggest difference you hear, is likely in the Amp itself.
As Amir shows here, the power output is insanely anemic and most headphones will sound flat with onboard audio.
So when you use an Amp with any external DAC, it will likely sound great in comparison.
For me on my Laptop, I use my FiiO K1 along with whatever headphones I bring with me.
This provides me with a mostly great experience on the road, as I only have lower impedance planar headphones, or BA IEM's.
But the difference vs my Acer Nitro 5 or my XPS 13 (that I sold yesterday) is very distinguishable, and I would bet that most of the difference comes in the output impedance + power offered.
I can tell you that in some objective listening tests, its hard to tell the FiiO K1 apart from my DX7 + JDS O2 stack. It really depends on the track, and the headphones.
Testing vs the DX7 alone really does depend on the headphones since some headphones will have sliding frequency response that I can easily distinguish since I own this gear and listen to it every day
But I can tell you that if you piped some onboard audio via "line out" into the back of your Amp, and tested against your Gugnir Multibit.... with real objective listening (and not this bias you post on the forum).... its unlikely you will hear a difference where the Gugnir will outperform the onboard (unless you really have an older and very terrible onboard chip).