Since it's vastly the most probable one, it's the first thing you ought to check.I reject the explanation.
Since it's vastly the most probable one, it's the first thing you ought to check.I reject the explanation.
It seems you came here looking for answers and then dislike the answers and use your time here to discount them. You are gabbing with experts you know and some of them are heavy duty advanced experts but yet you go on.I consider content more important than form, and I find that insinuating that someone's trolling/flamebaiting is much more disrespectful than saying shit and fuck.
We're all adults anyway. As long as there's no insult, some spice is fun
Well, I still didn't quite understand all the theory of how things are supposed to sound, because even having the musicians in front of me it would sound different depending on the room where they play, how many people there are, which speakers are being used, etc.
Sure, it's a recording, and it has precise qualities which the playback setup should be able to mirror as much as possible, but there too, you ask person A and they'll swear that vynil are best, person B will say CD, person C Hi-Res FLAC.
With all variables, most notably the DAC and the headphones (or the speakers/room combo), it's freaking exhausting trying to get that sneaky pure sound that nobody really knows if it exists in the first place.
And even hardcore audiophiles talk of their expensive headphones tube amp with that delicious slight warmth.
For instance I just found out that the Wicked Cushion earpads for the Maxwell sound different than the Geekria, more intimate, warmer and with more bass, derspite having same external materials and almost same dimensions (just half cm less in horizontal space inside. I suppose that together with their denser foam it's enough to affect the sound differently). And I was contemplating keeping both, and using the Wicked Cushion when I listen to Techno and other bass heavy music.
Btw, the Golden Gate was only 35 Euro for 1.5m... I don't think it's an unreasonable price for just only a robust and well isolated cable.
But I totally understand the concept and I agree.
ONE message. The rest is from today.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Weirdness too. We always only see what we have inside
Fair enough.
I reject the explanation. I'm like Saint Thomas, even if Jesus tell me X, if what I see and hear is Y that's what counts for me.
But although I reject it I don't discard it or forget it.
If one day I'll have the chance, I will definitely run a blind test. As I said before, curiosity is the core of every science.
If you're talking of me, you heavily misunderstood my sharing.
I disliked the AudioQuest BECAUSE it colored the sound.
I ended choosing the Mogami BECAUSE it was the one which sounded more transparent, open, "pure".
If the Mogami would have looked as ugly and felt as unpleasantly rough and stiff as the AudioQuest, I would have most probably just been happy with the KabelDirekt for 7.50 Euro instead of 30, which I am still not sure if it sounded any different than the Mogami (= less transparent and open).
But again, I disagree that color = bad.
I'm not aware of any setup that can achieve perfect neutrality, and my brain refuses to even want to understand if such a thing is even possible, like I explained to, ah, it was you , a few lines here above.
For me, music is meant to be enjoyed. If I am happier with a bit more bass or a bit more highs or a bit more warmth, I couldn't care less that my setup is not neutral.
Matter of tastes, more than matter of belief, for me personally.
Cheers, it was insightful
Like this guy?I am perfectionist, obsessive, and experienced in comparisons of many kinds.
I don't believe anyone said this?But again, I disagree that color = bad.
That goes without saying. You better stick to that and listen to those who actually are.I'm not an expert by any means
I beg you, don't trust your fallible human senses. They have steered us wrong in the past. The body of knowledge re: cables tells us you are making a highly improbable claim. Your senses are not proof of it, no matter if you are the comparisons master. Cables are not equalizers nor any other kind of audio processing circuits. Or in the case of digital cables they don't do DSP either.Fair enough.
I reject the explanation. I'm like Saint Thomas, even if Jesus tell me X, if what I see and hear is Y that's what counts for me.
But although I reject it I don't discard it or forget it.
If one day I'll have the chance, I will definitely run a blind test. As I said before, curiosity is the core of every science.
THE LANGUAGE! AGAIN!FYI (no, it's not fuck yourself idiot, it's really just for your info)
I tested the cables 3 days straight several hours a day with many songs and at some point it was like a blind test because in many occasions I had no idea anymore what I had plugged (I had a system where I didn't need to watch) and I had to check to be sure.Since it's vastly the most probable one, it's the first thing you ought to check.
I don't believe anyone said this?
Colour should be added to taste via EQ or at least tone controls... not by a cable.
I want to shelf my bass up 6 dB at 20 Hz. Please recommend a cable that can do that !
That goes without saying. You better stick to that and listen to those who actually are.
Especially when a dozen come here to explain the very same concept, but you sure don't wanna listen. Also, please watch your words. Fuck is barely tolerated around here, especially when used several times by post.
I don't possess neither the instruments nor the knowledge to do such tests.If you're satisfied that you are really hearing a difference and want to know why, you're going to have to measure something to get a meaningful answer.
I don't. I am not saying that my experience is objective. I KNOW that I tested in a way which in many occasions was very close to a blind test, and I know what I felt. So I know that something is different with that cable. And this has been confirmed in several reviews like I said in the previous comment.I beg you, don't trust your fallible human senses.
You and every other person who's done no real amount of critical listening with good controls for sighted bias. I think you will find actually doing so both enlightening and humbling - doing this for electronics is obviously challenging without the appropriate equipment, but you can test lots of things with software ABX tools. Not really much of value to discuss here.I don't think it was placebo.
But I'd be VERY surprised if that was the case.
It’s irrelevant what you think. Reality doesn’t care about your feeling.I don't think it was placebo.
Clearly not in comparing audio components.I am perfectionist, obsessive, and experienced in comparisons of many kinds.
But that doesn’t mean that you have to reject the explanation…I reject the explanation. I'm like Saint Thomas, even if Jesus tell me X, if what I see and hear is Y that's what counts for me.
What does that even mean then?But although I reject it I don't discard it or forget it.
That is not at all like a properly controlled blind test.I tested the cables 3 days straight several hours a day with many songs and at some point it was like a blind test because in many occasions I had no idea anymore what I had plugged (I had a system where I didn't need to watch) and I had to check to be sure.
It’s not supernatural wisdom that is needed to come to the conclusion that cables do not matter. It’s science. You should not and don’t have to believe in science. The good things that science models the real world, so it’s is predictive in nature, and therefore it also gives a repeatable framework to confirm it’s findings. So we don’t expect to just believe anything we say. Some have given you some good pointers to eliminate biases already to create a more objective comparison.It seems that you all are convinced that just because a bunch of you say that it's impossible I have to believe that it's impossible or I am a stubborn superstitious cave man who's resisting the wisdom of you Olympian Gods.
I don't possess neither the instruments nor the knowledge to do such tests.
But I will do a blind test when I get the chance.
Thanks for sharing
I am only describing what I experienced, without doing any further claims.
But that doesn't mean that I have to trust people who are not giving me an ounce of proof that what I experienced is absolutely impossible.
Here's a recent video that is related to the topic at hand. Some interesting points made about quality components (incl. cable) in the signal path and how it may make a difference in sound. I found some points made kinda interesting. Example: air-core inductor vs. ferrite-core inductor and how the temporary stored energy in the ferrite core might "smear" the sound.
Have you watched the video? I definitely didn’t tell you to take his words. Surely you’re mature enough to decide for yourself what words to take or not take?Does he supply any measurements for "smearing" the sound? Or measurements showing sufficiently gross differences in cable to reach audible thresholds?
Or are we supposed to take Danny at his word because he's a self-proclaimed expert?
So what interesting points are made? It's a 40+ min video rant, and I tried the first 8 minutes and it bored me to hell. Not gonna watch the whole thing.Some interesting points made about quality components (incl. cable) in the signal path and how it may make a difference in sound. I found some points made kinda interesting.
But those things are not in a cable... So why is that even relevant? You can't just make those kinds of extrapolations.Example: air-core inductor vs. ferrite-core inductor and how the temporary stored energy in the ferrite core might "smear" the sound.
We can measure those things, model them, and tell you what influence they might have. In the vast majority of cases, there is no audible issues unless the cable is severely misconstructed.I think the inductance/capacitance of a cable depending on the material & construction might affect transmitted sound in a small way.