I consider content more important than form, and I find that insinuating that someone's trolling/flamebaiting is much more disrespectful than saying shit and fuck.
We're all adults anyway. As long as there's no insult, some spice is fun
if someone wants to spend thousands on something that changes the way their components were designed to sound, it's up to them.
Well, I still didn't quite understand all the theory of how things are supposed to sound, because even having the musicians in front of me it would sound different depending on the room where they play, how many people there are, which speakers are being used, etc.
Sure, it's a recording, and it has precise qualities which the playback setup should be able to mirror as much as possible, but there too, you ask person A and they'll swear that vynil are best, person B will say CD, person C Hi-Res FLAC.
With all variables, most notably the DAC and the headphones (or the speakers/room combo), it's freaking exhausting trying to get that sneaky pure sound that nobody really knows if it exists in the first place.
And even hardcore audiophiles talk of their expensive headphones tube amp with that delicious slight warmth.
For instance I just found out that the Wicked Cushion earpads for the Maxwell sound different than the Geekria, more intimate, warmer and with more bass, derspite having same external materials and almost same dimensions (just half cm less in horizontal space inside. I suppose that together with their denser foam it's enough to affect the sound differently). And I was contemplating keeping both, and using the Wicked Cushion when I listen to Techno and other bass heavy music.
Btw, the Golden Gate was only 35 Euro for 1.5m... I don't think it's an unreasonable price for just only a robust and well isolated cable.
But I totally understand the concept and I agree.
LOL 8 messages as a count is not much. The rest of your rant is weird.
ONE message. The rest is from today.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Weirdness too. We always only see what we have inside
You asked for a scientific explanation. You got one.
Fair enough.
I reject the explanation. I'm like Saint Thomas, even if Jesus tell me X, if what I see and hear is Y that's what counts for me.
But although I reject it I don't discard it or forget it.
If one day I'll have the chance, I will definitely run a blind test. As I said before, curiosity is the core of every science.
The entire premise of improving the sound through cables is bizarre to me. The purpose of cables is transparency. It has been proven in many applications far more life critical than audio that's taken care of by straight copper. End of story. I do own premium copper cables but it's just for looks. I am glad I didn't hear any change in sound.
If one wants to improve sound, do the obvious... get different components. Cables have zero place in being active components in an audio chain. I find the concept intellectually insulting.
If you're talking of me, you heavily misunderstood my sharing.
I disliked the AudioQuest BECAUSE it colored the sound.
I ended choosing the Mogami BECAUSE it was the one which sounded more transparent, open, "pure".
If the Mogami would have looked as ugly and felt as unpleasantly rough and stiff as the AudioQuest, I would have most probably just been happy with the KabelDirekt for 7.50 Euro instead of 30, which I am still not sure if it sounded any different than the Mogami (= less transparent and open).
But again, I disagree that color = bad.
I'm not aware of any setup that can achieve perfect neutrality, and my brain refuses to even want to understand if such a thing is even possible, like I explained to, ah, it was you
, a few lines here above.
For me, music is meant to be enjoyed. If I am happier with a bit more bass or a bit more highs or a bit more warmth, I couldn't care less that my setup is not neutral.
Matter of tastes, more than matter of belief, for me personally.
Cheers, it was insightful