Well, this is not a good measure of sincerity around here as you now clearly found outobvious absurdity
Well, this is not a good measure of sincerity around here as you now clearly found outobvious absurdity
I did recall it, you will see that I clairified my satirical comment that the product would empty your bank account to indicate it would not actually be capable of doing so and that was satire.
I don’t agree with Poe’s law, it’s asinine in my opinion, but if it is a forum requirement to abide by it then I will add explicit disclaimers for every non literal turn of phrase that might not be understood to be satire. Hence the clear disclaimer that the network switch will not remove funds from your account and that said statement was satirical.
Last note my original post had a large winky face and ended with question marks saying hey I got it right???? What is the appropriate emoji that somehow more clearly indicates satire?
Thanks for clarifying.It is clearly, or not so clearly humour. I said as much above, or thought I had. But since the other fellow is concerned with people being mislead and trying to chase away negions, ahem…, For the record there are obviously no such things as negions for any new readers starting their journey. Or rather the term is an entirely fictitious one and obviously absurd as the correct term for a negatively charged ion is anion if I recall.
So in summary, buying magical switches for your Ethernet and plugging them in, does not purge your entire house and power grid of …. well anything, and one can most certainly not chase away non existent negions with an Ethernet box, or even a broom for that matter. It may clear your bank account of money. (Edit… I forgot Poe’s law, here is your humour indicating emoji in regards to the facetious statement about emptying your bank account, as clearly it will not reach in and empty anyone’s bank account and it is probably quite dismal at hacking in general). sorry emoji.
And the problem is we get regular new accounts posting equally nonsensical bunkum - either seriously or as a deliberate troll attempt, probably every week. Telling the difference between those, and yours is problematic.
Internet communication is a bit difficult at times especially in a forum where you have people posting stuff daily such as what you wrote sarcastically but being dead serious about it. And then getting offended if you asked them whether they meant it sarcastically ;-)
Because science. Dismissing his argument as invalid because of who is making the argument is committing a logical fallacy. You’ve attacked the person and not his point. If I recall that’s an ad hominemWho cares what Hans Beakerhuizen says/does? Why waste time?
Because science. Dismissing his argument as invalid because of who is making the argument is committing a logical fallacy. You’ve attacked the person and not his point. If I recall that’s an ad hominem
The science is explained in Amir’s video in this thread. Hans video or a similar one has for sure been posted before and dissected ad infinum proving his incompetence. No need to do it over and give pseudoscience even more attention.Because science. Dismissing his argument as invalid because of who is making the argument is committing a logical fallacy. You’ve attacked the person and not his point. If I recall that’s an ad hominem
In this case, the man committed so many fallacies himself that dismissing anything he says by default is the simply most efficient default position.Because science. Dismissing his argument as invalid because of who is making the argument is committing a logical fallacy. You’ve attacked the person and not his point. If I recall that’s an ad hominem
This video has been discussed here before. He's claiming incoming noise increases clock jitter in the DAC.Is he arguing that noise coming in on the Ethernet is affecting his clock in the dac? I can’t quite figure out what he’s trying to argue