If your IP has as many zeroes as possibly you get quieter blacker background 10.0.0.1 is much better than 192.168.1.99 the 9 are the worst’s
/s
More dynamic range can be achieved with a class A netmask than a class C!
If your IP has as many zeroes as possibly you get quieter blacker background 10.0.0.1 is much better than 192.168.1.99 the 9 are the worst’s
/s
Indeed.Glad to see so many network savvy people in here.
![]()
Token Ring... that's where it's at!!!!More dynamic range can be achieved with a class A netmask than a class C!
Can somebody reach out and ask them what mechanism makes this performance gain workAccording to the good people at Lejonklou, setting a fixed IP address for their Kalla streamer will lead to "higher musical performance".
https://www.lejonklou.com/tips/how-to-set-kalla-to-fixed-ip-for-improved-performance/

The one that rules them all?Token Ring... that's where it's at!!!!
Can somebody reach out and ask them what mechanism makes this performance gain work?
No, I'm sorry, not good enough! If a company thinks it's okay to have a customer pay € 5700 for such a product, they'd better have their shit in order.I think this is cognitive bias, rather than a scam/ignorance - hard to be too upset about to be honest. Made me smile, anyway.
Also make sure you chose the fixed ip adress carefully as the serialized bit pattern can have unexpected side effectsMakes perfect sense.
What you are all missing is the DHCP lease time.
With a fixed IP, the computer doesn't need to keep a energy sapping timer running.
With DHCP, the computer now needs to run said energy sapping timer so it knows when to renew the connection.
So it's obvious that the energy sapping timer causes issues with the temporal flow of co-located packets within the ethernet frame stream which reduces top end sparkle, muddies the mid range and gives you bloated bass.
My system has never sounded better since I installed a $5k 10GB network switch with $3k external reclocker, started using expensive CAT 8 cables capable of 40GB/s and fronted these all with $7K of LPS's.
I have also spent $4k on special footers for the switch, reclocker and lps's which really help reduce packet flow congestion.
Of course I need the headroom of this setup, which is capable of 5000 MBytes/second, to avoid contention/packet retries when playing back my 200 KiloByte/second FLAC tracks. You gotta have head room, just in case!!!!.
But I plan to convert my 60,000 FLAC tracks to WAV cause I am told that the time and energy needed to convert FLAC to raw PCM corrupts my sound and that WAV is the way to go.
I can also see moving to fixed IP addresses will lift my sound to a new level. I will report back soon!!!!
Peter
Oh, I'm sure the guy believes it.So it doesn’t really matter what you do on the router side, the small increase in performance is obtained by going to Källa’s web interface and entering a fixed address, which stops its DHCP lease process from running."
I think this is cognitive bias, rather than a scam/ignorance - hard to be too upset about to be honest. Made me smile, anyway.
I thought it might have been the late Peter Belt who claimed to have 'treated' various things so that they could influence the sound quality via 'quantum', 'morphic resonance' and more.Do you mean this guy? https://www.machinadynamica.com/machina17.htm
He actually goes into very in-depth explanations as to how taping little bags of rocks to your cables could work. What I find interesting is he mixes more-or-less accurate science with total snake oil nonsense about audio. I am not sure if he ever sold pieces of paper but he's sold everything else.
Or maybe these goofballs?
https://www.synergisticresearch.com/isolation/accessories/carbon-tuning-disks/ - little stickers you put on your cables that are supposed to improve the sound. In this case the attempt at explanation is thinner:
It "interacts with EM fields... to improve sound quality", you see.
No. This bafflegab was written with care.I think this is cognitive bias, rather than a scam/ignorance - hard to be too upset about to be honest. Made me smile, anyway.
Wow, that's expensive.€ 5700 for such a product,
I agree with those saying it's "a scam" although I think that's a little strong. The clue:I think this is cognitive bias, rather than a scam/ignorance - hard to be too upset about to be honest. Made me smile, anyway.
Since they know it does nothing for the audio, they hedge by saying it's a "very small" audible benefit. This is so you don't get upset when you don't hear anything. I'm sure you've noticed that in most cases, subjective audiophile stuff is claimed to have a night-and-day effect, deeper blacks, wider soundstage, blah blah blah. They're downplaying it because you're digging and they think you might actually A/B test it.The musical performance in Källa achieved by a fixed IP is a very small one. So it’s rather a bonus thing that we discovered and in no way a necessity to enjoy it.
Thank you!But my home networking is perfectly happy running on 2.5GE and Wifi6. Would be perfectly fine with 1GE and Wifi5, too. :-D
We should push this as factIf your IP has as many zeroes as possibly you get quieter blacker background 10.0.0.1 is much better than 192.168.1.99 the 9 are the worst’s
/s
I PayPal'd that guy a $5 tip one time for making me laugh so hard. I told him I was working on a quantum powered Faraday cage to protect against emf and solar flares. I said it kept vanishing into another dimension and wondered if he would help me fix it and partner up to bring it to market.Do you mean this guy? https://www.machinadynamica.com/machina17.htm
Token Ring... that's where it's at!!!!