- Thread Starter
- #41
It is an optional module for audio precision and costs too much for me to afford.There is another thread about the smell of this amp. Did Amir conduct a smell evaluation?![]()
It is an optional module for audio precision and costs too much for me to afford.There is another thread about the smell of this amp. Did Amir conduct a smell evaluation?![]()
It's so sad that no one can produce a device that manages to achieve the functionality of such a "classic" integrated amplifier with the laboratory values of the cute little "China desktop devices". The functionality of the Denon plus streamer and parametric equalizer functionality with the laboratory values of a WiiM pro plus / SMSL D-6s / Fosi V3 / Cambridge Audio Duo and at least 4 or 5 high-level inputs. That would be something!Conclusions
We always wish to find a hidden gem in audio products we test. The PMA-600NE could have been it but it is not. It has very good set of functionality but none of the measurements rise up to above average and some even miss that mark. For the cost, I think you are getting what you paid for but no more.
I can't get excited over this level of performance so can't recommend Denon PMA-600NE. You may think otherwise so vote above.
That is the shame. They could be improved with little or no cost. Just some care in design. I'd even guess there are plenty working for them who would relish the chance to show that care in design, but either aren't encouraged or are not allowed to do so. If you take a device like this and significant parts of it will be made for possibly a decade can you not make it better for not much effort? The HDAM's from Marantz have been okay, but nothing more for almost 20 years. Imagine if they'd just bothered to make them pretty good. Then again, I guess they made just as much money in their minds without the bother.It is depressing indeed and that is how I felt through the review, test after test. Hopefully in the future measurements will play a more important role in the company as I am sure a lot of these results could be improved with little to no cost.
I'm sure they know very well what they are doing - which is maximizing profit.It is depressing indeed and that is how I felt through the review, test after test. Hopefully in the future measurements will play a more important role in the company as I am sure a lot of these results could be improved with little to no cost.
Those commercial integrated amplifiers have almost always been that bad that it is not even worth commenting.
Since there are pre-outs we can measure the performance of the internal DACs. I chose to use Source Direct to give it a chance to produce its best performance:
LTS would disqualify both for not having straight frequency response. And they'd be right.The AVRs ( I have own 3 Denons and has been a member of LTS ) wasnt particularly better than this unit - but they had more power for the money .
Still not stellar amplifiers , an Aiyima a07 or Fosi V3 is better sounding ( and has lower noise )
You are right on the output. But source direct definitely made a difference.There are no pre-outs shown in your rear panel picture. That's just a loop out (rec-out) for a recorder of whatever source is selected. Source direct will have zero effect on a tape/recorder out.
I like your optimistic take and I would agree. For the money, you can't expect a great DAC and a great amplifier with dealer mark-up and everything. However, the power supply noise did not have to be there. That's a design flaw that I would expect on an $80 no brand amplifier. Especially the fact that the second harmonic 120Hz peak is even higher and more audible.I guess this could be relegated to casual listening/background duty with a pair of sensibly-priced bookshelf speakers. For that task, not too awfully bad.
But source direct definitely made a difference.
Channel imbalance though is unacceptable.