• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Denon DVD-A11 (DVD/SACD/CD Player)

NTTY

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Reviewer
Joined
Apr 27, 2018
Messages
1,227
Likes
7,313
Location
Switzerland
Hello everyone,

This is a review and measurements of the Denon DVD-A11, DVD(A), SACD, CD player and transport.

Denon DVD-A11_001.jpg



Denon DVD-A11 - Presentation

The Denon DVD-A11 was available from 2004 to 2006 and was kind of the successor of the Denon DVD-A1 which I previously reviewed. That said, the A11 was almost half the price of the A1, but at 2500€ at the time, it was still a high-end DVD Player.

With 6kg less than the A1, it is still a massive universal player with nearly 13kg (28.5lbs). So, some economy of scale was in the air for Denon.

It reads all available formats of the era, adding the SACD (that the A1 did not offer) on top of CD Audio, DVD and DVD Audio. Strangely enough, the SACD logo is discrete on bottom left (but engraved), while the tray received a golden-proud DVD Audio/Video emblem, go figure.

The back of this unit is quite busy:

Denon DVD-A11_002.jpg


For the first time this Denon offered a digital video output. We also get analog multi channel outputs, lovers of multichannel DVDA and SACD were happy (and still are, I guess).

On top of some now obsolete Denon Link and IEEE1394 output, we have our still standard SPDIF Coax and optical outputs.

The Denon is also very busy on the inside:

Denon DVD-A11_003.jpg



The chassis of this unit is luxurious but nowhere close to its DVD-A1 predecessor. Besides all the Audio processing units, we get several BurrBrown DACs on my interest:

Denon DVD-A11_004.jpg


You can see two of the three BurrBrown DACs on this picture, the DSD1790 and PCM1790, which are essentially the same. As per the service guide of the Denon, the PCM1790 was used for the two main channels, while the DSD1790 was used for surround channels:

1769789387781.png



As you might have seen, the Denon features the "AL24 Processing Plus", in-house oversampling filter, that is active only with PCM signal (that excludes DSD) and for all output channels!

This universal player also decodes the HDCD discs and I'm happy that Denon went the hard way of authorizing high resolution PCM digital output, despite copy protection, as the below table shows:

1769790220242.png


Theoretically, the above makes it the ideal transport. Of course, SACD digital output were forbidden, too bad, but the internal DACs were good enough as we'll see.

User Experience

On a personal perspective, this universal player is surprisingly pleasant. The buttons don't have the luxury touch of the A1, but it's ok. The big surprise to me came from the speed of action of the drive when fed with a CDA, DVDA or SACD. It is nearly as fast as the legendary good old Sony KSS drives.

The on-screen menu is cryptic and requires to read the documentation to properly setup the audio, I got lost many times.

Other than that, I loved the fact it can play SACD stereo and multichannel with the adhoc analog outputs.

I tested SACD and DVDA commercials discs and I had no issue, including with multichannel 24/192 DVDA. But the Denon can’t read a CDR and refused to read the TOC of some of my commercial CDs too.

When a multichannel DVDA is played, it will automatically downmix to 2 channels if the related on screen menu is set accordingly. For the SACD, it is necessary to use the front panel of the Denon to select the multichannel layer or the stereo one. No downmix, as far as I understood.

And it is gapless playback with all formats, of course! :p


Denon DVD-A11 - Measurements (Analog outputs - CDA and DVDA)

All measurements performed with an E1DA Cosmos ADCiso (grade 0), and the Cosmos Scaler (100kohms from unbalanced input) for analog outputs, and a Motu UltraLite Mk5 for digital outputs.

For once, I won't be consistent with my usual way of reviewing CD players because the big Denon does not read CDRs. So I had to create a DVD Audio, in a rush, with few test files so I could review the performances. This was a little nightmare to learn how to do that, but my friend @Vintage02 was of great help to reduce my learning curve to a reasonable amount of time. That said, I did not have time to reproduce all my usual test files, but I have a good set of them to report the real performances of the big baby.

With the software I used to author and burn a DVDA, I was restricted to 16 or 24bits, and 48kHz/96kHz/192kHz sampling rate. So, I created two DVD Audio test discs, one at 16bits/48kHz (to compare with my usual test CD) and one at 24bits/48kHz (to get high res tests).

Let's start at 16bits.

The Denon output 2.2Vrms, a little more than the standard 2Vrms. I saw a small 0.2dB channel mismatch. The phase was non inverting and dead flat across the bandwidth.


Measurements - Analog out 16bits/48kHz

The following tests mimic my usual CD tests but at 48kHz, instead of 44.1kHz. Let's start with my standard 999.91Hz test tone @0dBFS (without dither):

Denon DVD A-11_999.91Hz_0dBFS_LR.jpg


Nice, we get the full resolution of the PCM 16bits with negligible distortion (-114dB). We can see some PS leakage though (50Hz and harmonics), and we get a better view of that below:

Denon DVD A-11_PS.jpg


At -120dBr, we can ignore, impossible to hear, but I would have preferred not seeing them.

I forgot to add the view at -6dBFS (without dither):

1769867061102.png


The power supply leakage decreased a little, good news.

Around the second harmonic, you can see some spikes that are due to the quantization errors in the digital domain. It means that the Denon has a much higher resolution than 16bits so that we can see the mathematical rounding approximation in the digital signal.

As a matter of facts, I have calculated that with 48kHz, I should use a sine of 999.21Hz, instead of my usual 999.91Hz, because it generates a better spread of these rounding errors over the bandwidth (less repeat of identical subframes in the resulting PCM code). Thanks to the high resolution of the Denon to get me to realize it!

----

Next is the bandwidth:

1769792343755.png


It is very flat, no surprises, but my guess is that with true 44.1kHz, we would see the typical roll off at 20kHz from the Denon AL24 filter.
We can see the almost 0.2dB channel mismatch.

----

Let's have a look at the job of the oversampling filter, with a wider bandwidth:

1769793437905.png


The filter attenuates by roughly -90dB which is fair. That said it does not look like the standard AL24 filtering of Denon, and that is a surprise. Indeed, I could not find a trace of the usual trick from Denon with this filter that recognizes typical AES tests and switches to a shaper filter in that case. Here it is always a sharp filter, which I prefer, but it is not the AL24. Weird. Only testing the same with 16bits/44.1kHz could confirm if the behavior is different (I guess yes).

Another feature of the Denon filter is to increase the bit depth in real time, which means the standard 3DC test of Stereophile does not show a square signal, but a sine (due to the increased bit depth and associated calculation to increase the resolution of the signal). So let's try:

Denon DVD A-11_3DC_RCA.jpg


Yeah, it's not a square but a beautiful sine, meaning the AL24 filter is indeed in action. That was a true technical advantage of this filter. It increases the resolution at very low level, providing a refined digital signal signal to the DAC. We have very little noise in this test, meaning a silent "CD" player.

So my guess is that the Denon AL24 filter goes "sharp" mode with 48kHz, which is good news on my perspective.

----

Let's have a look at the multitone test that a lot of you like very much:

1769814096622.png


Besides one spike at 150Hz, which I see regularly, we get 18bits distortion-free range, nice.

----

Let's move on to the jitter test:

1769814597382.png


This trace is good, we get only very low level random noise and few spikes, worst case at -110dBr, so that is impossible to hear, very good for the era and a universal player.

----

Sorry no inter-sample overs tests since I did not have the time to create the necessary files, they would have required more time than I had, maybe in the future.

----

Other measurements (not shown):
  • IMD AES-17 DFD "Analog" (18kHz & 20kHz 1:1) : -70.8dB
  • IMD AES-17 DFD "Digital" (17'987Hz & 19'997Hz 1:1) : -73.7dB
  • IMD AES-17 MD (41Hz & 7993Hz 4:1): -101.2dB
  • IMD DIN (250Hz & 8kHz 4:1) : -91.8dB
  • IMD CCIF (19kHz & 20kHz 1:1) : -72.7dB
  • IMD SMPTE (60Hz & 7kHz 1:4) : -96.3dB
  • IMD TDFD Bass (41Hz & 89Hz 1:1) : -120.4dB
  • Dynamic Range : 98.9dB (without dither)
  • Crosstalk: -124dBr (1kHz), -107dBr (10kHz)
  • IMD Crosstalk: -127dBr (1kHz in one channel, 5kHz in the other, IMD components analyzed as side bands of the 5kHz test tone).
  • Pitch Error : 19'996.76Hz (19'997Hz requested) ie -12ppm
  • Gapless playback : Yes
  • De-emphasis compliance : Yes
The IMD scores are so so at high frequencies, but nothing that we can hear. I'm used to see better, that's all.
The Dynamic range is the best that can be measured (unweighted) with 16bits.
Crosstalk is very low with my test that prevents shut down of the unsolicited channel.
Pitch error is a small -12ppm (GPSDO corrected).
This CD Player is gapless and will properly decode CDs with Pre-emphasis.

----

The below is a test I like a lot, the THD vs Frequency at -12dBFS. With older DACs, it shows their limitation in resolution:

1769816750777.png


Here it is extremely good, meaning the BurrBrown DACs generate minimum distortion.

----

As I did with the Sony CDP-597, I add a "max DAC resolution" measurement test. It is performed from a 999.91Hz sine @-12dBFS with shape dither (from Audacity). I restrict the THD+N span to 20Hz - 6kHz in REW not to account for the noise of the shape dither beyond 6kHz. I take the calculated ENOB and simply add 2bits to it (due to the -12dB attenuation, as 1bits=6dB). The potential maximum, when calculated from the digital WAV file, is 18.7bits under this test. A "transparent" DAC should achieve 18.7bits, ie 100% in this test.

Here are the results compared to others:
CD Player model or DACCalculated ENOB (999.91Hz sine @-12dBFS with shape dither, THD+N span = 20Hz - 6kHz)Percentage of max resolution achieved (higher is better)
SMSL PL20018.7bits100%
OPPO BDP-9518.7bits100%
SMSL PS-200 (from CD player)18.6bits99.47%
SMLS PL2018.5bits98.93%
Denon DCD-900NE18.5bits98.93%
Onkyo C-73318bits96.26%
SMSL PL15018bits96.26%
SMSL PL10017.9bits95.72%
Denon DVD-A1117.6bits94.12%
Sony CDP-59717.5bits93.58%
Onkyo DX-735517.3bits92.51%
Denon DCD-356017.2bits91.98%
Yamaha CD-S30316.8bits89.84%
Revox B-226S16.8bits89.94%
Accuphase DP-7016.6bits88.77%
Sony CDP-337ESD16.6bits88.77%
Teac VRDS-25x16.5bits88.24%
Marantz CD-7314.9bits79.68%

I was honestly expecting better than that. The limitation is the noise floor, not the distortion and it is likely to limit the performances in 24bits as well.

Overall, the performances with 16bits is near perfect. This old universal player is an ideal CD Player, and I say well done to Denon!


Measurements - Analog out 24bits/48kHz

Denon DVD-A11_006.jpg


Like I said at the beginning of this review, I got lost many times in the Audio setup. At one point I saw everything was truncated to 16bits and then I changed an option and got a higher resolution.

With that, my standard 999.91Hz @0dBFS is the below (FFT length reduced to 128k/4 averages to mimic Amir's FFTs, instead of my standard 512k/32 averages):

1769820011905.png


Oddly enough I got much more power supply leakage (50Hz and harmonics). The SINAD is near 110dB, very good for an old DVD Player! The distortion is extremely low, too bad there is that low level noise.


Denon DVD-A11 - Measurements (Analog outputs - SACD)

Denon DVD-A11_005.jpg


The low level noise is also what limits the performances with the SACD, but all channels have the exact same performances. The below is from the Denon Audio Check CD and that is a 1kHz sine tone @-16dBSACD (=-16dBFS):

1769820685905.png


Most of the distorsion is the one of the test SACD, not from the A11. We again get PS leakage but less than with 24bits PCM, and some from 60Hz leakage too (go figure).


Denon DVD-A11 - Testing the drive (from Audio CD)

What would be good measurements if the drive would not properly read a slightly scratched CD, or one that was created at the limits of the norm? The below tests reply to these questions.

Here are the results:
Test typeTechnical testResults
Variation of linear cutting velocityFrom 1.20m/s to 1.40m/sPass
Variation of track pitchFrom 1.5µm to 1.7µmPass
Combined variations of track pitch and velocityFrom 1.20m/s & 1.5µm to 1.40m/s & 1.7µmPass
HF detection (asymmetry pitch/flat ratio)Variation from 2% to 18%Pass
Dropouts resistanceFrom 0.05mm (0.038ms) to 4mm (3.080ms)Up to 2.5mm
Combined dropouts and smallest pitchFrom 1.5µm & 1mm to 1.5µm & 2.4mmPass
Successive dropoutsFrom 2x0.1mm to 2x3mmUp to 2.4mm

It is one of the best drives I’ve tested and I'm not surprised for a universal one, they tend to be quite efficient at these tests. What's the good surprise here is that this performance comes with speed too, I like it.


Denon DVD-A11 - Digital Output (from Audio CD)

Denon DVD-A11_007.jpg


Since the Denon can't read my CDR, I used the Pierre Verany's test CD to analyze the digital output. It's not as efficient as my standard tests, but still good enough to make me confident that there's no digital transformation of the PCM signal. This test CD contains only a 500Hz test tone @0dBFS, and the below in an overlay of the digital output and a rip of the same track:

1769817617444.png


The multiple spikes are the quantization (rounding) errors in 16bits, since that is an undithered test signal. The two traces overlay perfectly. This means to me no digital transformation.

It also means Denon did not go the easy way of using an ASRC to satisfy the digital copy protection requirements for SPDIF output. This player processes digital signal with multiple paths as to not modify it when it is unnecessary.


Conclusions

This is a universal Player, more than 20 years old, that achieved a good 18bits full resolution, only limited by low level noise. Mine might have had a rough life, and it could explain some power supply leakages and a bit more noise than brand new. But even as is, it is an achiever.

It is also a robust drive than can serve as a more than ideal transport, except for SACD discs (no digital output in that case).

There are better measuring universal players, such as the OPPO BDP-95, but I like to see older devices measuring very well, and this is one of them.

This big Denon is a musical device that won't negatively impact the best masters. Do we need to ask for more?

I hope you enjoyed this review and I wish you a lovely weekend!
 
Last edited:
Wow, Firewire out! There’s at least one outboard DAC I can think of that would be compatible (Weiss DAC 202).

Silly copper plated chassis though. That’s not something money needs to go into, especially considering the high price of copper. Bling for the inside of a player, for no reason other than publicity photos of the internals?
 
Last edited:
I love the look of this era of Denon player. Performance is quite good for something that can play CD, SACD, HDCD, and DVD-A. Thank you for another excellent review.
 
Thank you Flo, highly appreciated.and shows why I am a fan of Denon. they make good consumer products.
 
Many thanks NTTY, a nice trip down memory lane. I always fancied the DVD A11, it's good to know it's got some substance to it.

It shows similar results on the -90dB 1kHz test as the DA-500, DCD-900 and DCD-SA1 that you also tested. Very intriguing. Is there any chance you could test that at a different level or a different frequency as well?

Many thanks, Nick
 
It shows similar results on the -90dB 1kHz test as the DA-500, DCD-900 and DCD-SA1 that you also tested. Very intriguing.

It is not intriguing at all: the 16 bits signal is requantized in 24 bits. Pioneer had a similar feature which gives more or less the same results. Take for instance the same signal out of a Pioneer DV-868AVi:

index.php


What I find intriguing is the somewhat so-so performance of the DVD-A11 with inter-modulation test signals.

I have seen many third parties measurements of Denon disc players that show a similar behavior: the Denon players perform consistently less well on IMD tests than players from other manufacturers.
 
Last edited:
It is not intriguing at all: the 16 bits signal is re-quantized in 24 bits. Pioneer had a similar features which gives more or less the same results. Take for instance the same signal out of a Pioneer DV-868AVi:
What I find intriguing is the somewhat so-so performance of the DVD-A11 with inter-modulation test signals.
I have seen many third parties measurement of Denon disc players that show a similar behavior: the Denon players performs consistently less on IMD test than players from other manufacturers.
Oh I'm definitely still intrigued. I've been reading John Atkinson's tests for decades, and the -90dB test always shows a three-level waveform. The ASR tests by Amir and NTTY of the three Denon players I listed in my previous post were the only exceptions I've ever seen - until now.

Thanks for your test and the link, I'd never seen that before. I didn't realise Pioneer had done the same thing. I've owned several high end Pioneer and Denon players over the years, including the DV-868, which has a special place in my heart.

Standing corrected, those four players seem to make a plausible sine wave out of a three-level signal in a way that no other players or DACs have done. I don't think it's just about the reconstruction filter, because all of Atkinson's tests show the post-filter output, and the filter always fails to join the samples up into a smooth-ish -90dB sine wave.
 
EDIT: I just had a thought. I always used the i-link output of my DV-868 to drive my Sony DA9000ES amplifier, and they were a fantastic combo. Then I got a DV-969AVi, then a Denon DVD-A1XV. I guess all of them had an interpolation algorithm.

Could it be that each of those players was able to perform the digital filtering / interpolation before outputting up-sampled digital audio over spdif / i-link etc, or was the interpolation only used with the analogue outputs?
 
EDIT: I just had a thought. I always used the i-link output of my DV-868 to drive my Sony DA9000ES amplifier, and they were a fantastic combo. Then I got a DV-969AVi, then a Denon DVD-A1XV. I guess all of them had an interpolation algorithm.

Could it be that each of those players was able to perform the digital filtering / interpolation before outputting up-sampled digital audio over spdif / i-link etc, or was the interpolation only used with the analogue outputs?
Only with analog output, it is a function of the oversampling (interpolation) filter for the D/A conversion. The digital output is not modified.
 
EDIT: I just had a thought. I always used the i-link output of my DV-868 to drive my Sony DA9000ES amplifier, and they were a fantastic combo. Then I got a DV-969AVi, then a Denon DVD-A1XV. I guess all of them had an interpolation algorithm.

Could it be that each of those players was able to perform the digital filtering / interpolation before outputting up-sampled digital audio over spdif / i-link etc, or was the interpolation only used with the analogue outputs?

Only with analog output, it is a function of the oversampling (interpolation) filter for the D/A conversion. The digital output is not modified.

After having a quick look at the digital signal path in each of the relevant service manuals, I concur with NTTY statement.
 
Here's a Stereophile test of the Cambridge Audio DacMagic, that caught my attention. It shows the -90dB analogue output with two different reconstruction filters:

1769854348246.png
1769854356344.png

https://www.stereophile.com/content/cambridge-audio-azur-dacmagic-da-converter-measurements

I never realised until 6 months ago that Atkinson normally used the linear phase filter for each test, which has equal pre-ringing and post-ringing (chart 1).
Chart 2 shows the minimum phase filter, which has no pre-ringing, and you can see the difference.
I had always thought that the rubbish on each step was noise, but it's not. It's ringing of the reconstruction filter. Here's a clear example with the Eversolo DMP-A8:

1769855433757.png


When you dive into it, you can tell that the ringing is at the Nyquist frequency.
Just as the three amplitude levels correspond to the least significant bits, the ringing cycles correspond to the sampling interval.
You can see what the reconstruction filter is trying to do, and it doesn't join the dots, so to speak. It's not a reproduction of the original sine wave.
Denon and Pioneer seem to have been able to get closer to this, and that's what I find very intriguing.
 
Here's a Stereophile test of the Cambridge Audio DacMagic, that caught my attention. It shows the -90dB analogue output with two different reconstruction filters:

View attachment 508202 View attachment 508203
https://www.stereophile.com/content/cambridge-audio-azur-dacmagic-da-converter-measurements

I never realised until 6 months ago that Atkinson normally used the linear phase filter for each test, which has equal pre-ringing and post-ringing (chart 1).
Chart 2 shows the minimum phase filter, which has no pre-ringing, and you can see the difference.
I had always thought that the rubbish on each step was noise, but it's not. It's ringing of the reconstruction filter. Here's a clear example with the Eversolo DMP-A8:

View attachment 508208

When you dive into it, you can tell that the ringing is at the Nyquist frequency.
Just as the three amplitude levels correspond to the least significant bits, the ringing cycles correspond to the sampling interval.
You can see what the reconstruction filter is trying to do, and it doesn't join the dots, so to speak. It's not a reproduction of the original sine wave.
Denon and Pioneer seem to have been able to get closer to this, and that's what I find very intriguing.

I regularly mention that the ringing seen on this view varies depending on the impulse response of the oversampling filter. That is what creates the typical symmetrical or asymmetrical ringing. The Gibbs phenomenon also plays a role in this view, because of the chosen frequency (997Hz) that does not have many odd harmonics (until 20kHz).

Denon tricked us by implementing a filter that used different impulse responses depending on the test signal being recognized (or not). By default the filter is a slow one, and switches to sharp when recognizing typical test signals (such as the AES IMD 18kHz & 20kHz). In my tests with 16bits/48kHz sampling rate, it is always a sharp filter that is in action.
 
I love the look of this era of Denon player. Performance is quite good for something that can play CD, SACD, HDCD, and DVD-A. Thank you for another excellent review.
Same. This is why friend bought a Denon 2900 DVD-player. Very robust, proper built quality, felt like a tank

1769866524851.png



I also used to own Denon's PMA2000R, although it looks more dated to my eyes: (2x80w, doubles it in 4 ohm, massive ampere capacity, very heavy unit. I ended up changing it to a more neutral sounding Denon AVR. From what I read they used to have different sound ideals for different teams and products. AVR was shooting for neutrality and the 2 channel amps were targeting the Japanese market, if I remember correctly it's meant to play a bit warm)
1769866550160.png
 
Last edited:
I found a way to trick the Denon about the -90.31dBFS (3DC) test tone.

I created a 16bits/48kHz WAV file and I burnt a DVDA at 24bits, forcing the software to encapsulate the 16bits signal into 24bits data stream. And of course, that defeats the detection mechanism of the ALPHA filter which increases the bit depth only on pure original 16bits PCM.

So here we go with the real 3DC performance of the Denon (that is 997Hz @-90.31dBFS 16bits):

Denon DVD A-11_3DC_RCA_16bits_RecordTo24bits.jpg


And the same WAV file originally created at 24bits, and burnt at 24bits too:

Denon DVD A-11_3DC_RCA_24bits_RecordTo24bits.jpg


We get a decent sine, similar to what I reported in the review (from a 16bits burnt DVDA).

The above is the proof that the ALPHA filter of Denon indeed increases in real time the bit depth of a 16bits data stream.

I created an ISO of this Test DVDA prototype which is good enough to share. PM me if you'd like a copy.
 
Last edited:
Coming from the pro video world I’m surprised to see BNC analog component video outputs in addition to RCA. Also as someone mentioned earlier, FireWire (audio)
 
Back
Top Bottom