All are, why would there be any differences?Thank you! And which one are the top 5 Denon AVR which are good for music?
If you believe the somewhat better SINAD measurements of the various models is audible, choose the best.
All are, why would there be any differences?Thank you! And which one are the top 5 Denon AVR which are good for music?
I now have my AVR-X1800H set up for test with REW, if you have any specific thing that can be tested this way just let me know and I will do it. Unfortunately the X1800H does not offer the 2 channel stereo playback menu, so any features associated with that cannot be tested, by me. I really should have kept my AVR-X4400H, that I was sure I tested the way the stereo, direct, pure direct mode, and crossover settings and they all seem to work as expected, again, can't do some of those things with the X1800H (say for $400). If I can sell the X1800H I would just grab a X3800H for playing around.There are both 2-ch and multi-channel modes listed for both direct and pure direct. I would expect both 2-ch and surround to operated as defined.
UPDATE: I just noticed the manual indicates both analog and PCM input default to the same stereo sound mode. So they should be processed/not-processed identically? Now I really want to test this all myself!
Yes, if you use the larger power supply and accept higher distortion, to claim 200 W 4 ohms.Do you believe Fosi V3 mono 240w is enough to ampifly each front channel ? Or i need more power ?
Thank. I read somewhere , 300W will be the minimum to worth it... Fosi have 240W... I have separated power supplies for each mono... 48V 5A each... it will be enough?Yes, if you use the larger power supply and accept higher distortion, to claim 200 W 4 ohms.
Thank. I read somewhere , 300W will be the minimum to worth it... Fosi have 240W... I have separated power supplies for each mono... 48V 5A each... it will be enough?
Can you point me to the X4800H 2ch Playback menu you posted. I can't find it in the latest US online version of the manual (search function within the pdf also does not find "2ch Playback" term).
Where can you get three front channels of Purifi for "1000" (lets assume USD since currency was not stated)? I'd strongly consider @Mort Hypex 502 recommendation, less expensive and you have a spare channel should one fail down the road.It´s just for movies ... my first option was Purify but I don't feel like spending 1,000 at the moment...«
Can you point me to the X4800H 2ch Playback menu you posted. I can't find it in the latest US online version of the manual (search function within the pdf also does not find "2ch Playback" term).
Thank. I read somewhere , 300W will be the minimum to worth it... Fosi have 240W... I have separated power supplies for each mono... 48V 5A each... it will be enough?
I can get for two channels , not three , and currency is euros.Where can you get three front channels of Purifi for "1000" (lets assume USD since currency was not stated)? I'd strongly consider @Mort Hypex 502 recommendation, less expensive and you have a spare channel should one fail down the road.
Why not just download the PDF version? Wonder why I had not thought of that? In my post I stated I did indeed download the pdf "I can't find it in the latest US online version of the manual (search function within the pdf also does not find "2ch Playback" term)".Why not just download the PDF version?
Then just go to page 240 and 241.
You do get the same contents in the online version but I find it easily to navigate the PDF file.
Online North America version:
2ch Playback AVR-X4800H
manuals.denon.com
. Both are dated 2022
. How are we supposed to know which one is actually current and correct?Sorry about that. When you stated you wanted to amplify each front channel, I assumed that meant left/right/center (since the center carries the vast majority of content and imo should be the first target for external amplification if needed).I can get for two channels , not three , and currency is euros.
Nice find and that's interesting!Why not just download the PDF version? Wonder why I had not thought of that? In my post I stated I did indeed download the pdf "I can't find it in the latest US online version of the manual (search function within the pdf also does not find "2ch Playback" term)".
And here is the link to the current US online version I downloaded, and to reiterate it has NO mention of "2ch Playback" in it (scroll down to Owner's Manual and click to download):
https://www.denon.com/en-us/product/av-receivers/avr-x4800h/300608-new.html
It would be nice if Denon posted only a single current online version of the manual. Both are dated 2022
. How are we supposed to know which one is actually current and correct?
Not sure I can agree with this. Most all "nominal" 4 ohm or 8 ohm speakers are actually all around 3-4 ohm minimum (and usually at frequencies above sub crossover point), which is the load the amp actually needs to drive regardless of a speakers marketing "nominal" spec (FF to 20:45):That's fine for 8 ohm nominal speakers but for 4 ohm nominal,...
And just how does one guess or assume one is more complete or more correct than the other? Just like new features could have been added to a later manual, an older manual could have contained incorrect information that was removed from a later version (making it appear less "complete", but more correct).Nice find and that's interesting!
I tried that on Marantz, same results, if you download it from the product website you get one version but if you download it from the link on the online manual, or look at the one line version you will get the same 2 channel playback menu. So the one linked from the online version is the more complete. I guess the one linked from the product website (your way) has a more preliminary version that missed certain information. I wonder if the 2 ch menu is the only thing missed, if you compare the number of pages the one you linked has 7 pages less!!
True, those who own the product will/could know which one is right, but not those who don’t own it yet.And just how does one guess or assume one is more complete or more correct than the other? Just like new features could have been added to a later manual, an older manual could have contained incorrect information that was removed from a later version (making it appear less "complete", but more correct).
When online I always hate to mention page numbers in manuals. One countries manuals could have multiple "current" versions (as is the case here), and I have noticed other countries versions can also be numbered differently than the US version. So hence I only mention actual section headers by name, etc.
It would be nice if Denon posted only a single current online version of the manual. Both are dated 2022
. How are we supposed to know which one is actually current and correct?