53 pages later, before things get forgotten or mixed up, I would like to summarize the 3800's performance degradation based on the test results. One can easily see that it is not just "SINAD", the fact is, the 3800's measured performance is 2 to 10 dB worse across the board, the only exceptions are Dynamic range, both offer about 108 dB at 2 V, based on AES17, and the 32 tones input test, the two are within 1 bit resolution of each other's score.
Whether some or all of the differences are audible for "normal use" would depends on the individual's conditions for their normal use. Again, I am only comparing measured performance of the following items, obviously the 3800 offers some new features, one being the preamp mode that is more flexible, and very useful and may benefit those who only need to use external amps for the LCR channels.
Summary of the measured pre out performance of the X3800H vs the X3700H with the AKM chip:
SINAD lowered by:
- a little more than 10 dB at about 2 V
- about 6 dB at below 1 V
Dynamic range:
- about the same for both (108.189 dB/108.484 dB for the 3800 vs108.933 dB/107.956 dB for the 3700)
32 Tone input signal:
- about 1 bit resolution less than the 3700
Linearity:
- 2 bits less in accuracy than the 3700
Intermodulation distortion:
- about 8-10 dB higher at -5 dBFS generator level, but the gap narrows at below generator level -20 dBFS and lower.
THD+N vs Frequency:
- about 8-10 times higher than that of the 3700, that is, about 0.007% vs 0.07% between 20 to about 7 kHz. At least 7 times higher than the 3700's from 7 to 10 kHz. I won't bother comparing >10 kHz because the harmonics will be in the ultra sonic range.
Crosstalk:
- about 2-4 dB worse than the 3700