Despite the perception and premium cost, Dirac is not much better than Audyssey XT32, and is in fact much worse when it comes to integrating subwoofers (with the exception of the Bass Control add-on, but they do different things). Neither do a good job of EQ above the bass region. Dirac lacks Dynamic EQ based on equal loudness, but has a better curve editor interface (but you won't use it if only applying EQ to the bass region).
My biggest gripe about Audyssey vs Dirac is that with Audyssey you are limited to the crappy little included mic.
I have a few of the Audyssey mics and I have compared them to each other and also compared them to my calibrated mic and all the Audyssey mics measure quite differently (multiple dB across the range) and none match my calibrated mic.
What’s the point in EQing to a target curve in Audyssey when the mic that’s measuring isn’t even capable of accurately measuring the frequency response of the speakers?
At least with Dirac I can use a quality calibrated mic that I can trust.
Why can’t Denon at least allow me to upload a simple text mic calibration curve into Audyssey? Surely that can’t be hard.
I suppose I could incorporate the mic calibration offset into the target curve for Audyssey, though for fine control I wound probably need to use the ratbuddy Audyssey tool.