- Thread Starter
- #41
Ah, that was a mistake. Corrected.The review says "it's on kind loan from the company".
Ah, that was a mistake. Corrected.The review says "it's on kind loan from the company".
Nice. The Holo Audio May already proved that R2R DACs can measure quite well too. It is the current benchmark of R2Rs.
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...may-probably-the-best-discrete-r2r-dac.10161/
I really want to see their power amplifier tested.
I believe the analogy was more about the amount of time and effort required to design and produce the device in question - not so much the actual type of engineering required.This isn't a mechanical watch. It's still just circuits. A mechanical DAC would be something.
Can't the same thing be said about most of the DACs that test decently on here?
Don't plenty of people buy DACs this price or higher that have 'high performance' that isn't really audible? Is it that different to buy a DAC with a lack of distortion that isn't audible or buy a DAC with some other 'feature' to the performance that isn't audible?
I don't see anything wrong with buying a DAC based on performance numbers just for performance numbers sake and I also don't see anything wrong with buying a DAC based on liking something about the implementation. In both cases the owners probably enjoy their DAC more because of those things.
This is absolute hogwash. There are practical reasons to have a preamp between the dac and the an easy way to control volume for one. But adding one isn’t going to make it more “musical” that is once again psychoacoustics at work. You are imagining that your music sounds better.
People are lead to or believe that somehow sample values are more accurate when using ladder type converters and are lead to believe that DS is merely a cheap way of converting and sounds poorer.
Religion mostly fed by conversations between proponents and disgust for people claiming otherwise.
It is clear that performance is dependent on the implementation. It is also clear that there are poor ladder based and poor DS based (or other) conversion types. Likewise it is clear that both methods can produce top notch performance.
The problem lies in the subjective evaluations and the fact that everyone has an opinion, experience and 'religion' (or should I say preference for a certain line of thinking). That and a free choice of thinking accounts for the 'perceived differences and preferences' not so much the actual performance.
Maybe. I for one used the headphone output of a Sony CD player for months until I bought a Krell pre-amp and I noticed no difference between the two other than the Krell was a louder system.Or it adds colortion-distortion that he finds pleasant and musical when it is part of the background sound mixed in with the music.
Too bad its a prototype.
I actually seen stocks and listened to it in widisim when I bought my spring2 lv2 there a month ago! Impressive stuff but way out of my budgetHolo May is in production, you can already (pre-)order it from Hong Kong reseller like https://wildism-audio-hk.myshopify....ual-mono-support-dsd1024-pcm1-536m-r2r-system (I've ordered from Wildism before. they are a legit company)
I'm sure other retailers like Kitsune Audio (or Magna-Hifi in europe) will follow
Any chance of sending the Terminator? I am waiting a long time for this dac to be measured here.Hello @amirm,
Thank you for your efforts to review the DENAFRIPS ARES II.
Best,
Alvin @ Vinshine Audio
Quite so. If you are convinced it sounds better and are enjoying it it doesn't much matter whether you are imagining the difference or not.Imagining or not, if it sounds sublime then that is what matters....aahhh, ignorance is bliss![]()
There's some irony with it being marketed as a R2R, if the default setting is Oversampling.Apparently the default setting on this DAC is OS/fast filter. Hope you can test the NOS mode as well.
What? No, the resistor ladders of old (i.e. Philips) all had proper oversampling. R2R does NOT mean NOS.There's some irony with it being marketed as a R2R, if the default setting is Oversampling.
This makes me so sad I thought you were in contact with the company, I am very intrigued by their amp and maybe a test was possible in the futureAh, that was a mistake. Corrected.