mp3 compression (lossy) does not affect dynamic range (volume).
Hi-res over-compresssed than mp3:
Album list - Dynamic Range Database
I'm starting to think this may be a poorly-run AI.
mp3 compression (lossy) does not affect dynamic range (volume).
Hi-res over-compresssed than mp3:
Album list - Dynamic Range Database
English is not my native language.poorly-run AI.
That's the least of your problems. Random irrelevant cut and paste in place of basic understanding is a much bigger issue.English is not my native language.
Commercial digital music is anti-piracy demo version of vinyl.
4-6 bit "enough for anybody."
Hi-res over-compresssed than mp3:
Credibility is of concern only to enthusiasts.
Music is a random signal, not a sine wave.
The pulses (samples) must be independent of each other.
The weak results of delta-sigma converters in real tests (music signal) indicate the imperfection of your methods and criteria.
For example: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/delay-distortion
I can only say that I replaced my Schiit Gungnir Multibit with at Topping DX7s. Topping sounded at least as good -- for 1/3 the price.not an expert in engineering, but from what I’m gathering from others outside here, “multibit” is supposed to be better because it “preserves the original samples”... but if said “multibit” design distorts the signal, wouldn’t that mean that it also isn’t really good at preserving the original signal in the first place?
and delta-sigma is supposedly inferior because it’s a simulation... but then what’s so bad about a very well executed simulation?
based on this, wouldn’t the implementation of both design types and the design as a whole matter more than whether or not one is “delta-sigma” or “multibit”?
just a horse sense take on this, lol
Music is a random signal, not a sine wave.
The pulses must be independent of each other.
I can only say that I replaced my Schiit Gungnir Multibit with at Topping DX7s. Topping sounded at least as good -- for 1/3 the price.
Mind you, I was able to sell the Gungnir in under an hour on Canuck Audiomart for very good price. The guy told me had the GMb before, sold it, regretted it, and was very glad to get a replacement. Everybody ended up happy.
why not? synthesizers are like arb waveform gen these days, and percussion = impulse by definitionA "pulse" is not a valid audio signal, so why would you want to reproduce it accurately and what does accurately mean? Audio is band-limited, as is the ear, but a pulse is not. And, as far as I know, the goal of a DAC is to reproduce audio signals for human consumption.
I think you need to explain a bit more why you're mentioning DF/Gearspace or AKM chips, it's not clear to me how these are related to the topic.
Shannon-Nyquist. A bandwidth-limited impulse is what is considered regardless of the source, including synthesizers.why not?
why not? synthesizers are like arb waveform gen these days, and percussion = impulse by definition
why not? synthesizers are like arb waveform gen these days, and percussion = impulse by definition
looking forward to see someone actually measures and publishes the rise/fall time of a strike in real life.Well when you develop a 0 mass cymbal or an infinite force drumstick, let me know.
looking forward to see someone actually measures and publishes the rise/fall time of a strike in real life.
Google definitely not working as well as before anymore.A cymbal strike.
Does Google not work where you live?
Google definitely not working as well as before anymore.
Always wish to see a waveform captured from a scope, analog’s the best, so we also know the frontend isn’t limited.
Always wish to see a waveform captured from a scope, analog’s the best, so we also know the frontend isn’t limited.