• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

David Chesky on Streaming Convenience vs Sound Quality

Next time you want to refer to gullibility, try talking about use car salesmanship or snake oil. Religious people are not necessarily gullible.
You didn't comprehend what he wrote and seemingly what I said either . Enjoy the holidays away from this thread .
 
Religious people are not necessarily gullible.
Agreed and I basically said that. There is no reason take anything in audio based on faith, yet some do. It is technology and can be measured. Why someone like Chesky would spew such nonsense in the face of data is a mystery. And I said that on page one of this thread a few hours after it was started.
 
This is what Perplexity.AI says about Chesky being a doctor

1735068318154.png
 
To broaden the search term...

drchesky.png
 
To broaden the search term...

View attachment 416239
As @Martin has said a page or 2 ago , I can find nothing other than a kids record adopting the Dr Cheeky for the title but the artist is just stated as David Chesky.

He is from a family of medical doctors but I've seen nothing to say he has claimed to be any form of doctor (medical or PhD , not even honorary) so I think that's @Spenav muddying the water ). Let's leave that particular angle alone please .
 
In science there is no proof and no "truth"
????
If you studied math, you certainly were tasked with proving that a theorem is true. As an example, you could prove that the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem is true under some conditions.
 
Last edited:
He is referred to as Dr. David Chesky without reference on half a dozen web sites. None of his official biographies mention anything about a doctorate nor does he ever refer to himself as a doctor. He has, however, released several albums under the moniker Dr. Chesky. Perhaps he's a doctor like Dr. Demento is a doctor. One would have to ask him...

Martin

Thank you for that explanation. From what I've read, he might not even have a college degree at all. So it must be a musical name like Dr. Demento.
 
Do you exist? I think you're a bot.

Moderators, are bots allowed on ASR threads?


.
They are normally pretty quickly identified by our Community of Bot Sniffers. But some might slip through. AI is getting harder and harder to spot. Soon we will all be conversing with AI replicants. They say we have nothing to worry about. :oops:
 
What confirmes that a Dr. is necessary for being knowledgable?

Just asking for a friend....
 
What confirmes that a Dr. is necessary for being knowledgable?

Just asking for a friend....
Not always, but too frequently a doctorate is an indication of conformity with the prevailing group think.

Of the two most knowledgeable gentlemen I've known, one had a doctorate and one didn't finish 8th grade. Neither was omniscient nor claimed to be infallible. Just saying...
 
Not always, but too frequently a doctorate is an indication of conformity with the prevailing group think.
Don't know ... may be.
In my profession it is 'usual' to have a Dr., because you are a Doctor, without really proof of ability to be a 'Doctor'.
 
Don't know ... may be.
In my profession it is 'usual' to have a Dr., because you are a Doctor, without really proof of ability to be a 'Doctor'.
I hear you. It's probably telling that no one ever says, "Professor, heal thyself."
 
A University degree is something we did a long time ago. Even if you got an MSEE or any MSc type degree only 5 years ago, for the most part it is already obsolete. Engineering moves very fast these days, and what we prove in University is merely our ability to learn.

I am not saying you don't need fundamentals. But I never once used my ability to crack Fourier and Laplace functions in my professional life to be honest. Nor does what I did in my engineering career give me any more authority/knowledge than the average, well-informed, constantly learning ASR regulars. I have known people with advanced degrees from very prestigious universities I'd never work with again. The biggest sin in engineering is to *think* you know everything there is to know about any specialty. The learning never stops, and what you knew yesterday may well be meaningless tomorrow. For example, Steve Ballmer was a brilliant student in academia by all accounts (never met him), but he famously laughed off the Apple iPhone as a stupid product.

I think it is horribly bad form to claim you have a degree you didn't earn (and unless you don't own the company you work in, you'll get fired on the spot for providing false credentials in tech), but I have worked with plenty of people that don't have a university degree and yet are a force in the tech industry I work in.

In any case, I don't think any of that is relevant to the topic - the statement in the original message in this topic is self-condemning to any independent thinker. Zero debate IMO.
 
Last edited:
For example, Steve Ballmer was a brilliant student in academia by all accounts (never met him), but he famously laughed off the Apple iPhone as a stupid product.
There is nothing wrong with laughing off the iPhone idea, well besides the point he was wrong, of course.
But it is much more important what you do when your mistake becomes obvious.
Do you go the learning way or do you go the stubborn way?
Makes all the difference. Credentials has nothing to do with it.
 
A University degree is something we did a long time ago. Even if you got an MSEE or any MSc type degree only 5 years ago, for the most part it is already obsolete. Engineering moves very fast these days, and what we prove in University is merely our ability to learn.

I am not saying you don't need fundamentals. But I never once used my ability to crack Fourier and Laplace functions in my professional life to be honest. Nor does what I did in my engineering career give me any more authority/knowledge than the average, well-informed, constantly learning ASR regulars. I have known people with advanced degrees from very prestigious universities I'd never work with again. The biggest sin in engineering is to *think* you know everything there is to know about any specialty. The learning never stops, and what you knew yesterday may well be meaningless tomorrow. For example, Steve Ballmer was a brilliant student in academia by all accounts (never met him), but he famously laughed off the Apple iPhone as a stupid product.

I think it is horribly bad form to claim you have a degree you didn't earn (and unless you don't own the company you work in, you'll get fired on the spot for providing false credentials in tech), but I have worked with plenty of people that don't have a university degree and yet are a force in the tech industry I work in.

In any case, I don't think any of that is relevant to the topic - the statement in the original message in this topic is self-condemning to any independent thinker. Zero debate IMO.
My ME degree paid off nicely. As we head towards robots, automation in all things including transportation, and AI a university degree in any engineering or science discipline is a worth while effort if so inclined. I will say there are a dearth in much needed trade education opportunities, for those fields in in the US. Agreed off topic.
 
Back
Top Bottom