• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Danny Richie's latest...

Status
Not open for further replies.
It is what people say who "don't know what they don't know". Time has passed Danny by. What was viable and semi-normal in the 80s and 90s is not in any way good for today. Audio science has made massive progress since then. He is stuck to his youthful days in how he looks at audio. He needs to increase his technical knowledge a lot. He is a good speaker repair guy, but for overall engineering of a speaker? Nope. He is most likely a nice enough guy but he needs to study up on the last 20 years of audio advancements. In many trades, people think they are amazing and do a fantastic job when in reality they have been doing the same mistakes and mediocre job for 20 years. You have to really examine yourself and your work product to make sure you really are doing top notch work. So many car mechanics, plumbers, home remodelers etc. that repeat mediocre jobs their entire lifetime. Danny may be that person.
Wrong, Arnie Nudell of Infinity, Peter Walker of Quad electronic, Philips of Holland, Altec US, David Hafler, Bob Carver and others wrote the book, sorry no significant improvement since then, except in the digital conversion.
 
Uh huh
Keith
 
That all said, it does seem like the Wilson had some questionable design decisions from the factory, no?

Yep, but any potential buyer could get readily from an 18-year-old Stereophile review. :)

No Danny show required.
 
Interesting and thanks for sharing.

I am seasoned enough to set my expectations low for having any major impact on Danny or his followers. However, I do know some that have left the flock, and my hope is to be a light for those who might be skeptical or trying to judge his veracity. In the end, there are bigger problems and more interesting problems to solve.
I find it interesting that Danny gets as much bandwidth as he does on forums. I mean, this thread in particular is now 19 pages long. :)
If he were reading this he'd just be sitting back in his chair smiling.
You guys do you. But I've already spent way more of my bandwidth than this deserves.

Cheers,

Dave Reite.
 
This thread is 2+ years old. I don’t think we need to bring this back from the dead. ;)

On edit: We were convinced that this thread should be allowed to continue. Fingers crossed Team. It’s your forum after all. :)
 
Last edited:
Upon further discussion and member input, will allow thread to continue.
 
Last edited:
He usually makes flat on axis, but there's also usually now a 3kHz off axis bunching, with no on axis compensation. Usually the "terrible" speakers sort of balance things out albeit messy response all around.

I wonder how this new "NRD" speaker will measure up and sound. I kind of feel they should really make a 3 way as well, but then again, they like their own drivers.
I don't mind that cabinet design
1737802781732.png
 
But here I think Danny has good points and a good solution. On axes, the Wilson Audio Watt Puppy 8's FR is pretty lousy. Especially considering their price. :oops:
The solution will probably cost a lot with Danny's expensive crossover parts, but there will be a solution.He'll get to that,in detail,in the next video, so it's not covered in the video below. If you have bought a pair of expensive Wilson Audio Watt Puppy 8, I'm guessing that you can imagine spending a decent amount of money on a better crossover, to fix a good FR. That while swearing at Wilson Audio when you open your wallet.

Danny's measurements (the upper ones in the screenshot) is very similar to Stereophile's results:
View attachment 421805


According to Danny, they dip down to 2.4 Ohm. According to Stereophile : There is a drop to 2.2 ohms at 77Hz (fig.1)


Danny's solution is to fix the top's FR (mid-tweeter). Let the top work in almost full range mode and then disconnect the bass boxes and power them up separately with a subwoofer plate amp (maybe with LP-HP filter? )

Danny switches the bass drivers from parallel to series to solve the low Ohm dipping problem. More amp power will then be needed with this switching but with 92 dB (according to Stereophile: sensitivity my estimate coming in at 92dB(B)/2.83V/m) when connected in parallel, there is little to "take off" when switching the double 8 inch bass drivers so they get connected in series.
In this case, maybe not a bad thing to do, accepting that ownership of these is part of an exclusive 'club' where monster traditional amps able to drive a one ohm load hard is taken for granted. I heard what I think was a pair of WP 7s in totally free space, digital source and (large) Krell driven. I found them rather unpleasant, with a severe excess of upper bass/lower midrange bloat rather than a thump with screaming highs, the upper ranges totally non-descript... Feature of the area (part of a conference area I recall as it was a long time back) was a flight-exhausted Dan D'Agostino sprawling on the sofa area that the UK distributor had provided.
 
In this case, maybe not a bad thing to do, accepting that ownership of these is part of an exclusive 'club' where monster traditional amps able to drive a one ohm load hard is taken for granted. I heard what I think was a pair of WP 7s in totally free space, digital source and (large) Krell driven. I found them rather unpleasant, with a severe excess of upper bass/lower midrange bloat rather than a thump with screaming highs, the upper ranges totally non-descript... Feature of the area (part of a conference area I recall as it was a long time back) was a flight-exhausted Dan D'Agostino sprawling on the sofa area that the UK distributor had provided.
Why would Danny's measurements be better than Wilson audio's. This guy re-engineers everybody's speakers, and he also sells speakers, so his speakers are better then the hundreds of major and specialty manufacturers he has reviewed and modified? How does he get away with that?
 
He usually makes flat on axis, but there's also usually now a 3kHz off axis bunching, with no on axis compensation. Usually the "terrible" speakers sort of balance things out albeit messy response all around.

I wonder how this new "NRD" speaker will measure up and sound. I kind of feel they should really make a 3 way as well, but then again, they like their own drivers.
I don't mind that cabinet design
View attachment 423671

Looks like prettier packaging on the same tired drivers that GR already offers. After railing against metal cones when other manufacturers use them, he finds a closeout deal and suddenly they are ok. So, these are NRD inspired models within the GR brand? Since NRD has mainly been another GR marketing branch, looks like Danny felt he should give Ron some acknowledgment. Seems more synergistic than innovative in any major way.
 
Last edited:
Looks like prettier packaging on the same tired drivers that GR already offers. After railing against metal cones when other manufacturers use them, he finds a closeout deal and suddenly they are ok. So, these are NRD inspired models within the GR brand? Since NRD has mainly been another GR marketing channel, looks like Danny felt he should give Ron some acknowledgment. Seems more synergistic than innovative in any major way.
Rick, I have noticed also that he really tries to use "close out" or speakers he can get a great deal on. He then says they are awesome and amazing. When in reality they were just inexpensive speakers he could buy on the cheap. That is a big deal to me. It is normal marketing so I don't bother pointing it out all the time. I also have serious trouble in that he always uses the audiphile subjectivist terms in his post "fix" review. Like every other speaker, you really need to listen to them sto see if you like them. Having people on the internet telling you how bookshelf speakers are so amazing doesn't do it for me. His super expensive crossovers are not worth it. He can "fix" the crossovers using MUCH cheaper parts but he never shows that. I guess it is that he has a niche in the audio market and is pushing as hard as he can to make money at it. Most of the ASR crowd is not the type of person to spend big bucks on fancy parts with no proven better performance than using cheaper parts with the same values. Danny and Paul from PS Audio are what they are. Snake oil salesmen but with the down home folksy touch. Especially Paul. The Grandpa of audio.
 
Why would Danny's measurements be better than Wilson audio's. This guy re-engineers everybody's speakers, and he also sells speakers, so his speakers are better then the hundreds of major and specialty manufacturers he has reviewed and modified? How does he get away with that?
Do Wilson properly 'measure' their speakers, or simply create an expensive box (with a spell wound around the reputation) which sounds 'good enough' to entertain wealthy owners with deep pockets and usually, rather large rooms, so they sit far enough away that room reflections smooth everything out? You'd be amazed how a non-neutral speaker can still sound 'impressive' despite failings (I remember the magic in late 70s UK Tangent speakers which mostly had a classic deep 'W' response generally, but still sounded so convincing in our small living spaces, the poor power handling in the bass never a huge issue...

Not all of us sit glued to the speakers listening for every musical detail - even I don't do that now, but at least my fifty year old restored thin-wall boxes present a good central image and surprise with nice depth effects in suitable recordings. Also I can't play at high levels now even if I wanted to for ear/physical-wincing reasons as well as neighbour considerations (it could well be response issues giving the depth perspectives, but they're close enough on pink and white noise to the previous known speakers I have and are still excellent for speech and timbres in general if not pushed hard, so I don't really care any more, now the 'hobby' side has faded for me).
 
Last edited:
Rick, I have noticed also that he really tries to use "close out" or speakers he can get a great deal on. He then says they are awesome and amazing. When in reality they were just inexpensive speakers he could buy on the cheap. That is a big deal to me. It is normal marketing so I don't bother pointing it out all the time. I also have serious trouble in that he always uses the audiphile subjectivist terms in his post "fix" review. Like every other speaker, you really need to listen to them sto see if you like them. Having people on the internet telling you how bookshelf speakers are so amazing doesn't do it for me. His super expensive crossovers are not worth it. He can "fix" the crossovers using MUCH cheaper parts but he never shows that. I guess it is that he has a niche in the audio market and is pushing as hard as he can to make money at it. Most of the ASR crowd is not the type of person to spend big bucks on fancy parts with no proven better performance than using cheaper parts with the same values. Danny and Paul from PS Audio are what they are. Snake oil salesmen but with the down home folksy touch. Especially Paul. The Grandpa of audio.
Spending money on redoing a crossover with expensive parts is foolish not exactly snake oil but close.
If you don't like the crossover in your speakers, rip them out and go to active crossover, analogue or digital. You will really hear the difference.
Concerning Paul of PS audio he does try hard to sell his stuff but when he is not in selling mode, you can rely on his advice, he knows more about HIFi than most on this forum he is a technician, and he invested his money into several great companies before the present one. You might want to read his book.
 
Concerning Paul of PS audio he does try hard to sell his stuff but when he is not in selling mode, you can rely on his advice, he knows more about HIFi than...
...my sheepdog.

But maybe not.

He is, however, a world-class expert in grifting. Much better than nearly everyone on this forum.
 
He is, however, a world-class expert in grifting. Much better than nearly everyone on this forum.
It's all relative. You could say much of this whole industry is a "grift."
Danny Richie is a small player. Paul McGowan an intermediate player.

Audiophile egos (in many cases) are the size of a Goodyear blimp.
So, I think folks should be able to make valuation decisions and spend their money on whatever floats their boat. As long as it's not against the law.

Dave Reite.

Edit: Updated my post for the easily triggered. :)
 
Last edited:
You could say much of this whole industry is a "grift."
In the fashion audio segment, near 100%. The rest of audio (representing 95+% of the market), not so much.
 
I find it interesting that Danny gets as much bandwidth as he does on forums. I mean, this thread in particular is now 19 pages long. :)
If he were reading this he'd just be sitting back in his chair smiling.
You guys do you. But I've already spent way more of my bandwidth than this deserves.
I get your point, however I also see him get quoted as an expert in other places so having both sides of the information out there for people thinking of following his advise and/or ordering can be helpful.
 
I get your point, however I also see him get quoted as an expert in other places so having both sides of the information out there for people thinking of following his advise and/or ordering can be helpful.
Yeah, I don't disagree. So why did the moderator close the thread here? :)

Dave Reite.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom