Here is another of his videos that is wildly un-scientific:
The comments below are something to behold. He is basing his comments off of biased experience and belief in his hearing, and then proceeds to call anyone that tries to use science to explain why that test is meaningless "flat earthers". His cognitive dissonance with regards to this is stunning. He cannot respond to anyone in any scientific way, and actually doesn't understand that anecdotal listening is not science.
I actually prefer to believe some people are telling the truth when they report hearing differences they think are due to things like cables. The problem is when they start to make up pretend science to explain why. I can't understand that at all.
The comments below are something to behold. He is basing his comments off of biased experience and belief in his hearing, and then proceeds to call anyone that tries to use science to explain why that test is meaningless "flat earthers". His cognitive dissonance with regards to this is stunning. He cannot respond to anyone in any scientific way, and actually doesn't understand that anecdotal listening is not science.
I actually prefer to believe some people are telling the truth when they report hearing differences they think are due to things like cables. The problem is when they start to make up pretend science to explain why. I can't understand that at all.
Last edited:
