They have to fight his sidekick Ron from NRD for them. He is so far up Danny's wazoo...I understand that his devotees fight over the turds he poops, too.
They have to fight his sidekick Ron from NRD for them. He is so far up Danny's wazoo...I understand that his devotees fight over the turds he poops, too.
To be clear, responsibility for the design of this modification and any damage it creates rests entirely with Danny, not with Ascend Acoustics and not with RAAL.
Danny, you have made a gross unacceptable error, and I suggest you immediately take down both of your Sierra-2EXV2 videos and remove the upgrade from your website. I will also be informing RAAL.
The owner of Ascend demolishes Danny's arguments, on his forum. Danny looks really foolish on this matter.Not sure if there was a thread or mention anywhere, but Danny decided that improving an Ascend speaker was a great idea, and Danny apparently managed to deliver such an epic failure that it completely overshadows his past 'achievements', which is pretty amazing given the vast extent of his past failures....
Watching just the GR clip, it might seem half decent, but Dave's answer on page 3 and 4 illustrate how much of epic a failure Danny managed to deliver. Just skimming the thread, davef got his hands on Danny's 'crossover':
- for nearly $500 for the 'upgrade', you just get a bunch of uncut norez, tubes which don't fit the cabinet, bit of solder, a schematic and crossover PARTS, without a board or instructions, and you need to build the crossover yourself, which barely fits in the cabinet given its overly large components..
- ignoring performance (or lack of thereof), you get a simpler crossover that is entirely inadequate for the RAAL tweeter, which will damage the tweeter. But nevertheless, dave will measure Danny's masterpiece with modern measuring equipment, which Danny lacks.
This new epic and historic saga is still ongoing.
I guess this bit sums up well the Danny/GR Research upgrade fiasco:
In all honesty, when I saw GR Research's video on Ascend upgrade I knew this would be good, but even after years of Danny/GR Research isms, seems like that might be the worst we've seen yet. I mean, selling a $500 kit which will damage your tweeters... It's big, even for Danny and GR Research, if that's not a wake up call for his followers... (but who am I kidding, no saving those people...)
(And btw, I'm sure those RAALs are not cheap at all ... Ah, they offer ribbon replacements, which might be another fun project to go along the GR Research crossover 'upgrade'... But even the replacements ribbons are expensive...! Plus, imagine if you fixed them, they'd just break again a while after because of the 'upgraded' crossover... Ouch...)
Just read every bit of this thread......I leave feeling Sad of all things.The owner of Ascend demolishes Danny's arguments, on his forum. Danny looks really foolish on this matter.
When mentioned to him in the Youtube comments, Danny just gaslights with bluster and no facts. What a...
He does that all the time. Shame youtube software leaves no indication of this.Okay so this is how Danny is adressing my comment, to send his speakers to an independent reviewer. He deleted my comment!
I posted the same comment twice, and twice he deleted it. He is a coward.
I found a GREAT comment, bet it will be gone within 5 minutes......Ah yes, Danny -- who has designed speakers ranging from "okay enough I guess" to "laughably bad" but mostly just sells tubes and sheets of vinyl and foam -- is definitely qualified to school someone who designs actually good speakers for a living.
I love how he claims to make no money on his "upgrades"......laughable. But then takes a great amount of time to defend them.Ah yes, Danny -- who has designed speakers ranging from "okay enough I guess" to "laughably bad" but mostly just sells tubes and sheets of vinyl and foam -- is definitely qualified to school someone who designs actually good speakers for a living.

Well... he could make a living as a YouTube influencer -- and offer his products at a pass-through price as a public service.I love how he claims to make no money on his "upgrades"......laughable. But then takes a great amount of time to defend them.
So are we to understand, he is using his valuable time to do a Free benefit, with no profit margins what so ever??
Not convincing at all.![]()

How long has he been in business and really cannot manage this apparently overwhelming demand?I "think" what Danny is trying to claim, is that his more simplistic on axis ONE measurement, is more accurate based on the Klippel being ABLE to average from multiple directions, but that is VERY over simplifying how it all works.In the comments of this one, Dannie claims his measuring system is more accurate than the Klippel which he says is just a series of averages (or something along those lines).