FWIW, I think our armchair assessments are reasonable enough
a priori. We're less interested in language crafting and more interested in objective and relevant assessment of performance. Here, we're seeing a 1950s/60s style Tannoy coax variant at a high price point. The lack of a proper HF waveguide seems like adding an unnecessary handicap to the design that would
have to be fixed by signal processing. Certainly achievable, but why? And the cabinetry is... at best... stark, given the cost. Tannoy, bless their hearts, would charge big bucks, but throw in nice cabinetry.
The Tannoy coaxes were/are not bad at all, either --
albeit not particularly high sensitivity.
View attachment 490521
Tannoy Westminster Royal:
What's the deal with these, are they worth $50,000?
www.audiosciencereview.com