Agree with this. These are 13 ohms headphones , not all amps have enough current to drive this properlyThat is likely caused by anemic headphone amp driving it. With a powerful amp, I have no concerns at all in that regard.
Agree with this. These are 13 ohms headphones , not all amps have enough current to drive this properlyThat is likely caused by anemic headphone amp driving it. With a powerful amp, I have no concerns at all in that regard.
I would imagine that almost however they are made the tracks on the planar film are probably bigger cross section and almost certainly shorter than voice coil wire in a dynamic driver, so inevitably much lower resistance.I have the same kind question. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Could it be that they use lower impedance because they need a higher current? According to the product page they use lighter magnets.
The lighter the diaphragm, or bigger the magnets, or lower the impedance, the more (voltage) efficient headphones are, correct?
Thank you.
The latter. Just look at the huge (down to an extreme of ~ -8dB), broad, low-Q (more audible than high-Q) scoop in the compensated frequency response around 2-5kHz:
![]()
That's just poor, especially at this price. The pinna gain region is one of the most important features of a headphone's frequency response to get right for accurate tonality, and this headphone gets it very wrong. This large deviation from the target is reflected in the mediocre 61/100 preference rating as seen above. There are many better headphones than this at much lower prices.
I was always wondering and afraid to ask, since (it seems) I'm kind of an electronics moron - what happens if there's not enough current - clipping, or what?That is likely caused by anemic headphone amp driving it. With a powerful amp, I have no concerns at all in that regard.
No of course for safety reasons it wont be adviceable, but a ”Flea-watt” type of speaker amp may be very suitable?These headphones have sensitivity of 80 or 90-something dB per 1 mV... and 13 ohm impedance.
I don't think speaker amps are suitable...
No of course for safety reasons it wont be adviceable, but a ”Flea-watt” type of speaker amp may be very suitable?
Cheers!
And hearing damage if you push the amp to try to go loud. Some compressionWell, that is actually not *that* problematic, unless there's some major trouble with EQ-ing the dip. I'm not saying that we shouldn't look at it, just mentioning that a proper driver can be EQ'd away and be done with. Yet, it's been discussed before - there's so big variation, that tracking one specific pinna response is, well, non-universal, even if incorrect.
- what happens if there's not enough current - clipping, or what?
The ear's response in the sensitivity range of 2-5 KHz is unique to every individual because each person has a slightly different auditory canal, which effects the resulting resonance and peak sensitivity. I don't think it's possible to have a one-size-fits-all FR in this range, and then there's listener preference and experience to take into account.I thought brightness stems from frequencies between 1k and 5k being above the Harman's target, could you please explain what would be causing this?
Would the 'ideal' headphone that follows the target would sound bright to the majority of users?
I think they are not comparing the open to the closed in that quote. They are comparing the Aeon Flow (open and closed, I assume.) to the Aeon RT.So what is the message to take out of that? That the RT Closed has a dark midrange, congested soundstage, and could be more immersive?
Not so great after all, then?
cheers
https://photos.app.goo.gl/BKf2GdjRrJNX1SMAA@amirm It would be greatly appreciated if you could provide the interior dimensions of the earcups.
I was always wondering and afraid to ask, since (it seems) I'm kind of an electronics moron - what happens if there's not enough current - clipping, or what?
Yes, pure clipping.
I went down a similar path, but tried the Aeon Closed and Open before settling on the CX. My one complaint about the CX are the thin flat pads and sharp treble with no filter pads. I run them with ZMF Universe Lambskin pads and the two-notch white filters and they are phenomenal even with no EQ.I had an original Aeon Flow Closed and I enjoyed it a lot same as @solderdude I eventually replaced it with an Aeon Flow 2 Closed which has now been replaced by an Ether CX. For me I don't like the added low frequency energy A2C has it's slight U response isn't as enjoyable to my ears as the flatter CX
Don't they come with a filter preinstalled? What's the "default" filter?I went down a similar path, but tried the Aeon Closed and Open before settling on the CX. My one complaint about the CX are the thin flat pads and sharp treble with no filter pads. I run them with ZMF Universe Lambskin pads and the two-notch white filters and they are phenomenal even with no EQ.
Sort of, they come with the black foam installed which doesn't do much. The other filters, in order of dampening strength, are the black felt, one-notch white felt and finally the two-notch white felt. I've been through them all and believe the two-notch white is best suited for the CX. I also like to take the pad off of the earcup and fit the felt right on top of the driver, then fit the pad back onto the earcup.Don't they come with a filter preinstalled? What's the "default" filter?
Or insuffucient current, as someone written above?
I know about impedance matching and how to calculate amp power for particular headphones and loudness, but never heard about insufficient current.
Intriguing title "Dan Clark Aeon Closed RT Review - Way better than Audeze LCD-1", seems that this guy really likes the freq. response of these cans too and from the video I can make myself an idea about how these cans look like: