CD player vs. DAC shootout
I was curious to compare parameters of the nicely built CD player Vincent CD-S3 (2004) vs. a good but not the newest DAC, Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus (2012). Cambridge DacMagic Plus was already tested here. Vincent CD-S3 is a player with HDCD decoding option and has both RCA single-ended and XLR balanced outputs. It is a nicely built, heavy unit, from times when there was not a dictate to miniaturize everything.
I connected CD-S3 and DM+ simultaneously to my analog audio interface unit, which I use for level matching of various components to the input of the measuring card. This interface unit has balanced inputs and outputs and gain selectable by DACT stepper attenuator with 2dB steps. It has output noise of -120dBV(A) and negligible distortion.
CD-S3 sent the digital data through TOSLINK optical cable to DM+. CD-S3 was playing various test discs and signals were simultaneously measured at CD-S3 and DM+ XLR outputs. Signals were analyzed by MI Multi Instrument software and plotted as dBR relative to base frequency amplitude, in most cases. Because CD was a signal source, all measurements apply for 44.1kHz/16bit input data.
THD at 1kHz and 0dBFS
DacMagic Plus THD 1kHz 0dBFS
Vincent CD-S3 THD 1kHz 0dBFS
THD measured at DM+ output was 0.002% and SINAD was 90.91dB (BW 20kHz linear). THD at CD-S3 output was 0.001% and SINAD was 90.54dB. CD-S3 has a bit lower distortion, a bit worse SINAD, but DM+ has cleaner spectrum.
This plot shows measurement of both units with 48kHz measuring bandwidth. Note noise shaping of CD-S3 and lower noise of DM+.
THD at 1kHz and -60dBFS
DM+ THD 1kHz -60dBFS
CD-S3 THD 1kHz -60dBFS
THD measured at DM+ output was 0.133% and SINAD was 34.04dB (BW 20kHz linear). THD at CD-S3 output was 0.165% and SINAD was 31.17dB. CD-S3 has a bit higher distortion and worse SINAD, and we can see some spurious frequencies in this test, that are audible if we get high volume setting.
CCIF IMD 19+20kHz
DM+ CCIF 19+20kHz
CD-S3 CCIF 19+20kHz
Though CD-S3 has lower H3 distortion, DM+ performs better with cleaner spectrum and lower H2 (1kHz difference tone).
Noise - digital silence
DM+ has cleaner spectrum and lower noise, CD-S3 has some spuriae in the spectrum. This was measured with Fs=96kHz to show noise shaping.
DIM test – square 3.18kHz + sine 15kHz
DM+, DIM square 3.18kHz + sine 15kHz test
CD-S3, DIM square 3.18kHz + sine 15kHz test
CD-S3 is better in this test, has less fake frequencies in audio band.
Multitone test
Both CD-S3 and DM+ are doing well. Measured with Fs=96kHz and BW=48kHz.
Conclusion
Both the CD player and the DAC have respectable parameters, with one exception, and this is spectral cleanliness for low level signals. DM+ is clearly better in this. However, CD-S3 was a good partner to the 8 years newer DM+. Built quality is much better for CD-S3. But it was more expensive, about $1300.
I was curious to compare parameters of the nicely built CD player Vincent CD-S3 (2004) vs. a good but not the newest DAC, Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus (2012). Cambridge DacMagic Plus was already tested here. Vincent CD-S3 is a player with HDCD decoding option and has both RCA single-ended and XLR balanced outputs. It is a nicely built, heavy unit, from times when there was not a dictate to miniaturize everything.
I connected CD-S3 and DM+ simultaneously to my analog audio interface unit, which I use for level matching of various components to the input of the measuring card. This interface unit has balanced inputs and outputs and gain selectable by DACT stepper attenuator with 2dB steps. It has output noise of -120dBV(A) and negligible distortion.
CD-S3 sent the digital data through TOSLINK optical cable to DM+. CD-S3 was playing various test discs and signals were simultaneously measured at CD-S3 and DM+ XLR outputs. Signals were analyzed by MI Multi Instrument software and plotted as dBR relative to base frequency amplitude, in most cases. Because CD was a signal source, all measurements apply for 44.1kHz/16bit input data.
THD at 1kHz and 0dBFS
DacMagic Plus THD 1kHz 0dBFS
Vincent CD-S3 THD 1kHz 0dBFS
THD measured at DM+ output was 0.002% and SINAD was 90.91dB (BW 20kHz linear). THD at CD-S3 output was 0.001% and SINAD was 90.54dB. CD-S3 has a bit lower distortion, a bit worse SINAD, but DM+ has cleaner spectrum.
This plot shows measurement of both units with 48kHz measuring bandwidth. Note noise shaping of CD-S3 and lower noise of DM+.
THD at 1kHz and -60dBFS
DM+ THD 1kHz -60dBFS
CD-S3 THD 1kHz -60dBFS
THD measured at DM+ output was 0.133% and SINAD was 34.04dB (BW 20kHz linear). THD at CD-S3 output was 0.165% and SINAD was 31.17dB. CD-S3 has a bit higher distortion and worse SINAD, and we can see some spurious frequencies in this test, that are audible if we get high volume setting.
CCIF IMD 19+20kHz
DM+ CCIF 19+20kHz
CD-S3 CCIF 19+20kHz
Though CD-S3 has lower H3 distortion, DM+ performs better with cleaner spectrum and lower H2 (1kHz difference tone).
Noise - digital silence
DM+ has cleaner spectrum and lower noise, CD-S3 has some spuriae in the spectrum. This was measured with Fs=96kHz to show noise shaping.
DIM test – square 3.18kHz + sine 15kHz
DM+, DIM square 3.18kHz + sine 15kHz test
CD-S3, DIM square 3.18kHz + sine 15kHz test
CD-S3 is better in this test, has less fake frequencies in audio band.
Multitone test
Both CD-S3 and DM+ are doing well. Measured with Fs=96kHz and BW=48kHz.
Conclusion
Both the CD player and the DAC have respectable parameters, with one exception, and this is spectral cleanliness for low level signals. DM+ is clearly better in this. However, CD-S3 was a good partner to the 8 years newer DM+. Built quality is much better for CD-S3. But it was more expensive, about $1300.
Last edited: