Yes, they will. Nobody has ever proven otherwise.So, essentially all the dacs on the rating list sound exactly the same(if they are close together like the ones on the left where the Topping d90 is)?
Yes, they will. Nobody has ever proven otherwise.So, essentially all the dacs on the rating list sound exactly the same(if they are close together like the ones on the left where the Topping d90 is)?
Perhaps the human factor is what makes this unmeasurable. We hear things differently and interpret sound differently. I hope I love the cheaper sound!!Yes, they will. Nobody has ever proven otherwise.
Pick one and try to make it within the recent year or so to ensure the test gear is all up to date and stuff.Does Amir test the same variables for each dac tested? I will go back a pay closer attention to the graphs. I looked at the Matrix Sabre 3, Topping d90, which I purchased and many others.
Pick one and try to make it within the recent year or so to ensure the test gear is all up to date and stuff.
I find it hard to believe no one has done extensive double blind tests between dacs. Or have they? It would certainly put an end to the controversy.
A lot of studies=extensive. Thats all. I will try some google searches to see if there is anything credible.What do you mean by extensive? There are a number of double blinds tests done. The "controversy" is similar to the "controversy" that the world is flat.
A lot of studies=extensive. Thats all. I will try some google searches to see if there is anything credible.
Found they are all the same. Done by an enthusiast, not very scientific, not done the proper way and results varied. They varied based on which forum I read. Did find the neuroplasticity comment interesting. I will learn more about that as it pertains to the auditory system.
In what way where they flawed?It doesn’t take too long to see how the experiment is flawed And there’s not much out there except on music forums.
Not doing a proper number of trials, different listening conditions, asking people to listen through headphones, adding to many variables like a third dac option..In what way where they flawed?
So do DACs sound different then, assuming well-engineered?Not doing a proper number of trials, different listening conditions, asking people to listen through headphones, adding to many variables like a third dac option..
I’ve been curious, how does audio science review measure soundstage width, depth and instrument isolation, which are real things?
Apparently not if they measure the same. I think their “sound” comes from distortion or other forms of sound manipulation.So do DACs sound different then, assuming well-engineered?