• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

DAC burn-in/break-in? My Gustard X16 measurements

OP
Pdxwayne

Pdxwayne

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 15, 2020
Messages
3,219
Likes
1,172
Claiming significance at the <0.1% level with a cheap multimeter, no temperature control, and measurement far outside the design range is egregiously wrong.

Did I tell you about the time I measured a bacterium with a yardstick? It was very consistent. And the hell with you stuffy scientists with your insistence on things like gauge R&R and error bars.
Regarding temperature control,
Error bars and R&R. Stop avoiding the basics.
What error bar and R&R are you talking about? Examples please?

My home is temperature controlled. I have learned that before measurements, the DAC need at ~30 minutes warm up to stabilized (else multi meter won't get a stable reading).

I have measured my E30 at 3 different locations at 3 different times (Dec, Jan, Feb). All 3 times after the initial warm up, the measurements not varied by 0.001V.
 

Koeitje

Major Contributor
Joined
Oct 10, 2019
Messages
2,306
Likes
3,965
Just follow an online introductory course to statistics and you are good to go.

Not meant as flame or anything, its just that humans have very bad intuitions when it comes to what is a significant change and what is not.
 
Last edited:

solderdude

Grand Contributor
Joined
Jul 21, 2018
Messages
16,047
Likes
36,411
Location
The Neitherlands
E30 was also remeasured at the same time and same location when I first measure x16. It was to double check my previous results for E30. Same as today. Both times, DAC were/are in same location. Ambient temperature should be consistent both days.

Did you change the filters for both measurements ?
 
OP
Pdxwayne

Pdxwayne

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 15, 2020
Messages
3,219
Likes
1,172
Just follow an online introductory course to statistics and you are good to go.
Unfortunately I can't turn back time on my X16.

Like I mentioned, I have measured KTB and E30 multiple times at multiple dates (totally over 100 times). No errors bigger than 0.001v. That was why I said my multi meter have consistency.

Changes of 0.004V of X16 was never seen before on E30 nor KTB..
 
Last edited:
OP
Pdxwayne

Pdxwayne

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 15, 2020
Messages
3,219
Likes
1,172
Did you change the filters for both measurements ?
For X16, my initial test was with filter 1. My measurements yesterday were also filter 1 for apple to apple comparison.
 
OP
Pdxwayne

Pdxwayne

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 15, 2020
Messages
3,219
Likes
1,172
You have no idea what your errors are.
Even without careful matching of temperatures, measured over 100 times and I got consistentcy of 0.001V.
 

cjm2077

Active Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2020
Messages
160
Likes
261
Unfortunately I can turn back time on my X16.

Like I mentioned, I have measured KTB and E30 multiple times at multiple dates (totally over 100 times). No errors bigger than 0.001v. That was why I said my multi meter have consistency.

Changes of 0.004V of X16 was never seen before on E30 nor KTB..

From the manual for the DMM: Temperature Coefficient: 0.1*(specified accuracy) / °C

You're also well beyond the rated AC voltage measurement range of 50-60Hz.

It's just not the right tool for the job. You're right that over a short period of time it may be precise but not accurate. But over longer periods of time various drifts means that it will be neither.
 
OP
Pdxwayne

Pdxwayne

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 15, 2020
Messages
3,219
Likes
1,172
Measurement errors. DACs transfer function makes no difference even after years.
For my initial measurements, I specifically measured x16 2khz multiple times because it was odd as compared to E30 and KTB. I also measured E30 again to check 2Khz number. So measurements error out of questions.
 
OP
Pdxwayne

Pdxwayne

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 15, 2020
Messages
3,219
Likes
1,172
From the manual for the DMM: Temperature Coefficient: 0.1*(specified accuracy) / °C

You're also well beyond the rated AC voltage measurement range of 50-60Hz.

It's just not the right tool for the job. You're right that over a short period of time it may be precise but not accurate. But over longer periods of time various drifts means that it will be neither.
Like I said, my home is temperature controlled. I have measured my E30 in December, January, and February. Consistent results within 0.001V.
 

solderdude

Grand Contributor
Joined
Jul 21, 2018
Messages
16,047
Likes
36,411
Location
The Neitherlands
Here's the thing:
You are talking about 0.02dB difference at 4kHz and 0.1dB difference at 7kHz.

The question is how reliable your measurements are anyway.
For example, the E30 measures 0.486V @ 1kHz and 0.288V @ 10kHz.
This means that acc. to your measurements 10kHz is -4.5dB which it isn't at all, in fact it is way less than -0.1dB off.

How can you be sure your measurements are correct when every MM is always +/- 1 last digit per definition ?

Maybe, just maybe 0.1dB is barely audible in blind tests (I have never been able to detect any audible differences below 0.2dB amplitude differences with tones) but certainly will not be an audible subjective difference you described hearing.
 

Koeitje

Major Contributor
Joined
Oct 10, 2019
Messages
2,306
Likes
3,965
You need to setup a more controlled test environment, use better testing equipment and use statistics to determine if the difference is significant.
 
OP
Pdxwayne

Pdxwayne

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 15, 2020
Messages
3,219
Likes
1,172
Here's the thing:
You are talking about 0.02dB difference at 4kHz and 0.1dB difference at 7kHz.

The question is how reliable your measurements are anyway.
For example, the E30 measures 0.486V @ 1kHz and 0.288V @ 10kHz.
This means that acc. to your measurements 10kHz is -4.5dB which it isn't at all, in fact it is way less than -0.1dB off.

How can you be sure your measurements are off when every MM is always +/- 1 last digit per definition.
Yeah, as mentioned multiple times, meter not accurate enough to show real voltages.

But, it is consistent. It can show trend of changes when you have multiple filters measurements to compare. For example, my meter can show a deviation for e30 filter 5.

See https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...topping-e30-listening-tests.17988/post-665605.

It is also consistent when I measured E30 in Dec, Jan, Feb. Never deviate more than 0.001V for various freq measured.
Same for KTB. Measured multiple times, no deviation larger than 0.001V.

X16 on the other hand, shows up to 0.004V deviations from 2Khz on.
 
OP
Pdxwayne

Pdxwayne

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 15, 2020
Messages
3,219
Likes
1,172
You need to setup a more controlled test environment, use better testing equipment and use statistics to determine if the difference is significant.
Unfortunately that is all I have. There is only one change to measure a brand new X16. I can't turn back time for X16.
 

Tatteredmidnight

Active Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2018
Messages
275
Likes
506
Location
New Jersey
Unfortunately that is all I have. There is only one change to measure a brand new X16. I can't turn back time for X16.
Unfortunately it may just be insufficient. In measurement labs all equipment is calibrated and the behavior is properly classified within the test parameters. Without knowing these factors, you cannot confidently say you are properly controlling for outside variables and you can’t say your results are outside your standard deviation. Too many unknowns for any level of certainty here.
 
OP
Pdxwayne

Pdxwayne

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 15, 2020
Messages
3,219
Likes
1,172
Unfortunately it may just be insufficient. In measurement labs all equipment is calibrated and the behavior is properly classified within the test parameters. Without knowing these factors, you cannot confidently say you are properly controlling for outside variables and you can’t say your results are outside your standard deviation. Too many unknowns for any level of certainty here.
Of cause I don't have the correct setup for optimum correctness. I already stated standard deviation is 0.001V. Anyone here with proper equipments want to buy x16 and do same experiments? That would be awesome.
 
Top Bottom