I like 'em.Few tube amps make my 1626 monoblocks jealous, but 2a3 amps at the top of that list.
Unfiltered class D does not sound good, as engineer Bruno Putzney points out in this article on the evolution of class D sound:If you guys want to see what 2-3wpc can actually do on your desktop, just grab 10pcs of the little PAM8403 class D boards for a few dollars. Apart from the residual noise (the PAM 8403 is filterless class D), the power is virtually identical to the baby Schiit unit.
5V supply, run them off an old USB mouse cable and an iPhone charger.
View attachment 267230
There is probably a limit to what you should expect from an amplifier module that costs $1.22 per 10 pieces lot.Unfiltered class D does not sound good, as engineer Bruno Putzney points out in this article on the evolution of class D sound:
![]()
Life on the Edge - A Personal Perspective on the Past, Present, and Future of Class D Audio Amplifiers - HomeTheaterHifi.com
The past quarter century of class D developments look strikingly different when seen through the eyes of the audio consumer and through...hometheaterhifi.com
Wow amazing article! Shots fired for sure.Unfiltered class D does not sound good, as engineer Bruno Putzney points out in this article on the evolution of class D sound:
![]()
Life on the Edge - A Personal Perspective on the Past, Present, and Future of Class D Audio Amplifiers - HomeTheaterHifi.com
The past quarter century of class D developments look strikingly different when seen through the eyes of the audio consumer and through...hometheaterhifi.com
If I understand right I think you might have the right goal here, what is the threshold of audibility regarding objective measurements?When I offered money to any regular at ASR (and the gear to test with) who could identify consistently bad measuring Schiit from good measuring competition, mods removed the posts.
ASR folks refuse to put their ears to the test.
If I understand correctly it's 115 sinads. In a lab setting. I don't think more than 1% of people can hear better than 100 though.If I understand right I think you might have the right goal here, what is the threshold of audibility regarding objective measurements?
Around 115, if I remember correctly. Does that change as we get older, has anybody seen studies on that?If I understand right I think you might have the right goal here, what is the threshold of audibility regarding objective measurements?
Agree. Don't ask for a drop forge when all you need is a tack hammer.It's also worth noting that the ambient noise level of a quiet residential listening space is typically 30dB (or higher), while sustained exposure to SPL above 85dB can damage your hearing. That's a signal to noise ratio of 55dB.
I am NOT saying that's all we should aim for of course - there's headphone listening, peak SPL, times when we want to listen louder than 85dB, and the fact that very low noise and distortion are important aspects of good engineering. I just think it helps to have a little perspective - in normal listening our ability to distinguish between a system with a -80dB noise floor and one with a -95dB noise floor is questionable at best.
internetofmusic.nl
But you can run the Ghorns via XLR...and the AEGIR @ 30 watts via RCA only. A detail worth noting for some.The power of the 2 Gjallarhorns is roughly equivalent to 1 Aegir. The single Aegir is more costly but it is also rated at 4 ohms, the monos are not.
I just bought a Gjallarhorn to pair with my new Saga 2 preamp, to use in the upstairs workroom system for winter...will be interesting to see how that combination compares to the restored Kenwood KA-3500 and Marantz 2216 amps I've been using up there...
It sounds good, drives bookshelf speakers fine to normal listening levels. I really like the Saga 2 volume control capabilities with the stepped resistor, allows for perfect channel matching down to very low listening levels. One tends to use the remote with the Saga instead of the knob.How does it compare?
I'm running 2 gjallarhorn with KEF LS 50 Meta. Low to medium volumes and sounds really good.After reconfiguring my desktop audio system around a Wiim Ultra, I think it's time to replace my Parasound Halo with a smaller amp.
I'm currently using the Parasound with the HT pass through which makes it work like a power amplifier. 160W@8ohm / 240W@4ohm is spectacular but also massive overkill for a pair of LS50 Metas sitting less than 3ft away - plus I'm using an SVS Micro 3000 for bass.
I like the form factor of the Gjallahorn and it would work well with my Ultra and my Teac 301 CD Player.
Alternatively, I'm considering the Aegir (I'm worried about heat in my already hot office) and Vidar - both of these seem like a bit much.
These crazy guys at IOM have made an Ncore amp that matches the Wiim Ultra - this might be perfect but could be a hassle to get service if there is an issue...
![]()
The IOM Ultra is special designed for the Wiim® Ultra
The IOM Ultra is a high-end stereo power amplifier. It's housed in a compact full aluminium chassis with trigger on/off control.internetofmusic.nl
I'm wondering if anyone else has had good luck with the Gjallahorn and ~85dB speakers...