• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Current recommendation for instrumentation grade audio interface

OP
R

Raqs

Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 23, 2018
Messages
36
Likes
5
Well, not as such.
It has no USB port, indeed.

Now, adding a cheap SPDIF to USB should be easy.
More bad news for me and more kludgy-ness... Rather than this, I'm inclined to try the "Cosmos" route. Where can these devices be bought from? I only see the ADC available on the large retailer, but what about the APU?
 

staticV3

Master Contributor
Joined
Aug 29, 2019
Messages
7,951
Likes
12,766
The APU will be released very soon. It's not available yet.
 
OP
R

Raqs

Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 23, 2018
Messages
36
Likes
5
The APU will be released very soon. It's not available yet.
Good to know, thanks.

ADI-2 + USB to SPDIF adapter. How can one control the ADI-2 via SPDIF? ASIO drivers possible? Can't wrap my head around this solution to try to figure out if useful for me.

Maybe I just need to get the device and try it out.
 
OP
R

Raqs

Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 23, 2018
Messages
36
Likes
5
I decided to get a Clarett+ 2Pre anyway (found it for... $340 new?!), and will just have to test all three and keep one.

It's really unfortunate Amir hasn't tested the Clarett+ 2Pre (any known measurements?...) or the other interface that raised my interest, the SSL2+. I personally got THD as low as 0.00057% with the regular SSL, but that's still pretty far from the lowest I got with the EMU0404, so I won't settle for it.

But I don't feel I have a very good sense of how these interfaces of interest perform relative to each other.
 

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,759
Likes
37,603
I decided to get a Clarett+ 2Pre anyway (found it for... $340 new?!), and will just have to test all three and keep one.

It's really unfortunate Amir hasn't tested the Clarett+ 2Pre (any known measurements?...) or the other interface that raised my interest, the SSL2+. I personally got THD as low as 0.00057% with the regular SSL, but that's still pretty far from the lowest I got with the EMU0404, so I won't settle for it.

But I don't feel I have a very good sense of how these interfaces of interest perform relative to each other.
Check those video reviews I linked above. They have measurements. About 10:10 in the video. The Clarrett may be close to the Emu.
 
Last edited:
OP
R

Raqs

Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 23, 2018
Messages
36
Likes
5
Check those video reviews I linked above. They have measurements. About 10:10 in the video. The Clarrett may be close to the Emu.
The video you posted was for the Clarett 2Pre, not Clarett+ 2Pre (while I specifically referred to the Clarett+ in all of my posts). Amir has no tests for either.

Per Focusrite, the Clarett+ should have distinct advantages over the old model in some of these core data points I'm interested in (and seemed to match my departed EMU). Which is why I got a very early Clarett+ a few months ago when it hit the market, but I decided to stick with the Lynx at the time, and I returned it before I even tested it in my environment. I paid $500 then, so if this $340 works out, I'll not be overly bummed.

That said, I did find JK's review for the Clarett+ 2Pre.
He doesn't find that much distinction between the two iterations, and those he found don't always advantage the "+" version. The differences are so slight though, I'd be inclined to put it on slight testing variations in his environment.
 
Last edited:

Rja4000

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
May 31, 2019
Messages
2,755
Likes
4,673
Location
Liège, Belgium
I decided to get a Clarett+ 2Pre anyway (found it for... $340 new?!), and will just have to test all three and keep one.
Given your budget, and if you want to go for a measured device, why not to go for the Motu Ultralight Mk 5 ?
 
Last edited:

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,759
Likes
37,603
Given your budget, and if you want to go for a measured device, why not go for the Motu Ultralight Mk 5 ?
I'd thought about that one, but it is $95 over budget. Which may or may not matter to the OP.
 

Rja4000

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
May 31, 2019
Messages
2,755
Likes
4,673
Location
Liège, Belgium
By the way, checking Amir's ADC measurements, I think the ADC ranking is a bit confusing.

For ADC, there is a wider variety of maximum input levels, from one interface to another.

So you should try to guess, from available measurements (I think IMD vs level, specifically, which Amir usually measures in dBu) what will be the performance with the typical target level out of the System 1.

That would bring the cheap Focusrite closer to the Motu than we may think for lower input voltage: the more expensive interfaces have better SINAD because they allow a much higher input level (that is meaningless for you).

I whish Amir published systematically a plot of SINAD or THD+N vs level (in Vrms or dBu) for ADCs.
Hopefully, we have IMD vs level.
 
Last edited:
OP
R

Raqs

Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 23, 2018
Messages
36
Likes
5
By the way, checking Amir's ADC measurements, I think the ADC ranking is a bit confusing.



For ADC, there is a wider variety of maximum input levels, from one interface to another.



So you should try to guess, from available measurements (I think IMD vs level, specifically, which Amir usually measures in dBu) what will be the performance with the typical target level out of the System 1.



That would bring the cheap Focusrite closer to the Motu than we may think for lower input voltage: the more expensive interfaces have better SINAD because they allow a much higher input level (that is meaningless for you).



I whish Amir published systematically a plot of SINAD or THD+N vs level (in Vrms or dBu) for ADCs.

Hopefully, we have IMD vs level.

Interesting point, Rja4000. When you say "cheaper Focusrite," you mean the Clarett+? Or the Scarlett?
Interesting point, Rja4000. When you say "cheaper Focusrite," you mean the Clarett+? Or the Scarlett?
 
OP
R

Raqs

Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 23, 2018
Messages
36
Likes
5
Well, not as such.
It has no USB port, indeed.

Now, adding a cheap SPDIF to USB should be easy.
I am not sure I have a good handle on this. What exact type of device would be a fit for this duty?

I am only aware of DACs taking SPDIF in and "outputting" USB, but that can't be it.

SPDIF is completely missing from my universe, so I'm flying blind on this.
 

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,759
Likes
37,603
Interesting point, Rja4000. When you say "cheaper Focusrite," you mean the Clarett+? Or the Scarlett?
I think he means the Clarrett you are considering is cheaper than the Motu at $595. The Scarlett is a step down in most performance parameters.
 
OP
R

Raqs

Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 23, 2018
Messages
36
Likes
5
I think he means the Clarrett you are considering is cheaper than the Motu at $595. The Scarlett is a step down in most performance parameters.
Got it, and I agree. Thank you Blumlein 88.

As stunning as that is for both an AP S1 from the '90s and an EMU from the 2000s (?), it's so hard many decades later to find something fitting their high bar and not break the bank. I mean, surely, the AP wasn't selling for a buck new, but the EMU was pretty affordable.
 
Last edited:

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,759
Likes
37,603
I am not sure I have a good handle on this. What exact type of device would be a fit for this duty?

I am only aware of DACs taking SPDIF in and "outputting" USB, but that can't be it.

SPDIF is completely missing from my universe, so I'm flying blind on this.
Normally recording interfaces have ADAT, SPDIF inputs and often outputs and USB for in/out to the connected computer.

This one version of the ADI-2 FS has no USB connection.
Here are the connections on the rear panel. The newer Pro FS versions have USB connections.
1652923085031.png
 
OP
R

Raqs

Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Nov 23, 2018
Messages
36
Likes
5
Normally recording interfaces have ADAT, SPDIF inputs and often outputs and USB for in/out to the connected computer.

This one version of the ADI-2 FS has no USB connection.
Here are the connections on the rear panel. The newer Pro FS versions have USB connections.
View attachment 207487
Yes, I am aware of this... NOW. I am not sure how this product makes sense the way it is, but I guess there were times when USB was not quite such a normative hookup for all peripherals (audio and the rest of it).
But why!?......

I am still looking for some direction on what type of SPDIF/USB interface I'm looking for. If I get an order tonight early enough with the big retailer here in the US, I'd be able to test out the RME weirdo (which I already received) tomorrow eve.
 

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,759
Likes
37,603
Yes, I am aware of this... NOW. I am not sure how this product makes sense the way it is, but I guess there were times when USB was not quite such a normative hookup for all peripherals (audio and the rest of it).
But why!?......

I am still looking for some direction on what type of SPDIF/USB interface I'm looking for. If I get an order tonight early enough with the big retailer here in the US, I'd be able to test out the RME weirdo (which I already received) tomorrow eve.
You have to remember RME is mainly a pro audio company. A device like this made plenty of sense in that context. If you have that RME (I think I understood that you did) you feed the digital output to another interface with USB via ADAT or into a soundcard with SPDIF in and you'll get the digital recording of it on the PC to work with. Doesn't your Lynx card have one of these digital inputs. Toslink/ADAT would be great as it would electrically isolate the PC from the RME.
 

Rja4000

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
May 31, 2019
Messages
2,755
Likes
4,673
Location
Liège, Belgium
Normally recording interfaces have ADAT, SPDIF inputs and often outputs and USB for in/out to the connected computer.

This one version of the ADI-2 FS has no USB connection.
Here are the connections on the rear panel. The newer Pro FS versions have USB connection
This one is an upgrade of the original ADI-2 (non pro).
The pro is quite a different device: it has 2 stereo DAC, DSP which allows EQ, bass control and so on, USB interface, advanced display, remote control (for the "R" version), AES/EBU i/o,...
And better DAC and ADC.

Not the same price league, but not the same beast either.
 
Top Bottom