Current Drive VS Voltsge Drive

Does current drive subtend to an infinite source resistance
Ideal voltage sources have a resistance of zero and an ideal current source a resistance of infinity.
Both cannot be achieved in practice but current voltage amps are quite close.

I can see how so-called "current drive" at frequencies above 130Hz, with certain content could be perfectly fine, but if you're passing the buck to the sub, what exactly are you proving?
So-called „current drive“ is exactly what I did with the resistance in the cable. My setup proofed this claim and you can hear it:

Edit:
As also found by Nelson Pass this effect seems to be visible most with high sensitivity full range speakers which I use in my setup.

Edit2:
Me and my business will move to a new location soon. This means I again have to setup my system. I will do some distortion measurements If I‘m there and plan to publish it here. So hopefully the effect of higher amplifier resistance (less damping factor) can be demonstrated by measurements during the next few weeks

Last edited:
Does current drive subtend to an infinite source resistance
Supposedly; A C.C.S. is often described as a voltage source with a gigantic amount (theoretically infinite) of resistance in series with it. Typically, R can be in the megohms to hundreds of megs practically. Ideally, changing the voltage across a C.C.S. should result in no change in current whatsoever. As far as using current drive for a speaker driver, it could work, but there would be no electrical contribution to unwanted cone motion damping, so such damping would have to be done mechanically somehow, unless tubby bass is sought after.

Last edited:
Supposedly; A C.C.S. is often described as a voltage source with a gigantic amount (theoretically infinite) of resistance in series with it. Typically, R can be in the megohms to hundreds of megs practically. Ideally, changing the voltage across a C.C.S. should result in no change in current whatsoever. As far as using current drive for a speaker driver, it could work, but there would be no electrical contribution to unwanted cone motion damping, so such damping would have to be done mechanically somehow, unless tubby bass is sought after.
Hmm, that confirms my understanding.

So @DrCWO is doing is not really "current-drive", because the impedance very, very low compared to infinity. It's closer to "balanced impedance working.

Does current drive subtend to an infinite source resistance
Well, maybe not infinite in any practical sense, but very high, typically in the megohms range.

So @DrCWO is doing is not really "current-drive", because the impedance very, very low compared to infinity. It's closer to "balanced impedance working
Right
It is more like a voltage amp with low damping as a tube amp. But the Firstwatt F1 that claims to be a Current amp has (if I remember correctly) 47Ohm resistance Not really a current source either…

Right
It is more like a voltage amp with low damping as a tube amp. But the Firstwatt F1 that claims to be a Current amp has (if I remember correctly) 47Ohm resistance Not really a current source either…
It's sorta current-sourcey, but not very much so.

5x to 10x the DC resistance is a) feasible and b) good enough to get the main benefits from high-impedance drive IME. Higher impedance just removes even the last bit of electrical damping which is not exactly what we want around resonance.

Replies
2
Views
732
Replies
18
Views
683
Replies
10
Views
696
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K