Ghostofmerlin
Member
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2024
- Messages
- 65
- Likes
- 98
I mean, if you just get some decently built Blue Jeans cables and stop worrying about it you’ll be fine.
Test in mono using your 2 speakers side by side, different cable on each and use A/B speaker switch or pan pot. If you cant hear a difference you won't in stereo. (First try with the same cable to make sure your speakers match enough)., it's just difficult to switch back and forth quickly enough to retain one sound to compare with another.
Long ago a friend and I compared cheap RCA cables to some that were quite a bit more expensive (I don't remember the brands). We didn't hear a difference.I'm new here, just registered today although I've read it for awhile. I have a new system and was considering the cables that I owned so where better to get advice than a forum that supports the idea that cables make a difference.
So I commented on the issues with ABX testing...
![]()
Audiogon Discussion Forum
I’ve followed many of the cable discussions over the years with interest. I’ve never tested cables & compared the sound other than when I bought an ...forum.audiogon.com
And then my experience with AQ Dragon power cords...
![]()
Audiogon Discussion Forum
I was talking to my dealer about how good the system sounds that he sold me. I mentioned that I had tried some new speaker/interconnect cables from a lo...forum.audiogon.com
It was quite a journey and I realize that there is no room for me in that cult. But while I appreciate the scientific approach here I have heard some variations with cables that leads me to believe that they can sound differently, it's just difficult to switch back and forth quickly enough to retain one sound to compare with another. Plus, the differences are very slight while the cost can be huge. So I'm not sure that these beliefs fit in here as well.
For those who say "is there a question there?", not really, just hoping to get some discussion and learn from a different pov.
Yeah think you'd call it ABX...They did actual ABX?
Yeah think you'd call it ABX...
A bunch of the YT personalities took part.
Totally blind. I'll have to find it...
It was during a recent audio show in Malaysia.
Found it...
Definitely not an ABX testYeah think you'd call it ABX...
A bunch of the YT personalities took part.
Totally blind. I'll have to find it...
It was during a recent audio show in Malaysia.
Found it...
What ... a ... farce!
Time lag from cable changes - by itself - invalidates any accuracy to the test. Then the fact that there can be sounds from the hooking-up-and-unhooking of two grossly different-sized cables means that there was a possibility of another "tell". A true test would use a switcher.
Another thing; the person who did the switching had a dog in the fight. He manufactured the more expensive cable. Even if he were completely honest, his body language could easily give the choices away. The body language of the other (visible) listeners would be a giveaway, too.
Not only that, but there were no measurements to show that his boutique cable was within standard specs. I don't really doubt that it was, but my point is that we have no assurance of that.
This was not a test. This was a sham and a farce. These people either didn't know or didn't care what "rigorous controls" means.
Jim
Ok, I was going from memory and forgot how they were switching the cables.Definitely not an ABX test
Not a brilliant way though, because the two speakers are in different places in the room. The way they interact then with the room is actually quite likely to create a difference in the sound, that is nothing to do with the cable.Test in mono using your 2 speakers side by side, different cable on each and use A/B speaker switch or pan pot. If you cant hear a difference you won't in stereo. (First try with the same cable to make sure your speakers match enough).
And Im in the "you won't hear a difference club" but the above is a way to prove it to yourself.
Power cords are a total scam.
Not a brilliant way though, because the two speakers are in different places in the room. The way they interact then with the room is actually quite likely to create a difference in the sound, that is nothing to do with the cable.
If a dealer told me that that would be the last dollar spent there.I was prepared to be happy to hear some improvement from the cables that I tested. But confirmation bias was somewhere else that day.
And I get the motivation that some people have for buying these cables... they've spent a lot of money already and are told that they can get that last X% if they just get some expensive cables. The dealer who sold me my gear said there was no way I should consider using my Mogami cables on this new equipment. When I returned the cables the he sent to try he said that no one had ever returned cables in his 40 years of experience, unless it was to get more expensive cables.
no one had ever returned cables in his 40 years of experience
Even with all those flaws, he still went 16/32 overall, which is the same as flipping a coin.What ... a ... farce!
Just critiquing this on testing protocols .... the time lag from cable changes - by itself - invalidates any accuracy to the test. Then the fact that there can be sounds from the hooking-up-and-unhooking of two grossly different-sized cables means that there was a possibility of another "tell". A true test would use a switcher.
Another thing; the person who did the switching had a dog in the fight. He manufactured the more expensive cable. Even if he were completely honest, his body language could easily give the choices away. The body language of the other (visible) listeners would be a giveaway, too.
Not only that, but there were no measurements to show that his boutique cable was within standard specs. I don't really doubt that it was, but my point is that we have no assurance of that.
This was not a test. This was a sham and a farce. These people either didn't know or didn't care what "rigorous controls" means.
Jim
It seems to me subjectivists enjoy a journey.