As you probably know, I couldn't agree more - although that is not a piece of music I'd want to listen to
No need for
ad hominem generalisations about "the do-gooders" (which is a nebulous concept in any case).
I believe that equal respect should be shown to all, but that what "equal respect" specifically entails may depend on one's relationship to the person and the context of the interaction.
To illustrate, I show respect differently to members of my family due to the nature of their relationship to me and other contextual matters, than I do to friends or colleagues. I also show respect differently in some cases to members of different groups in society because of their relationship to groups I belong to (Aboriginal people in my home country of Australia, in particular circumstances, for example).
All this really means is that I try to be aware of possible sensitive contextual matters (e.g. my grandmother's expectations about family, e.g. the colonial history of Australia) when interacting with others.
I also think you're wrong in what you seem to be implying, i.e. that people who are sensitive to these matters are only so because it makes them feel good. But anyway, as you know, I'm hardly defending every person who's every cried "cultural appropriation". Surely though, we can focus on what
is good, rather than having the discussion degenerate into ad hominem generalisations about the people doing or not doing it.
And what if you don't like it because it's insensitive or exploitative? (I mean "you" generally here.)