I find the measurements hard to read due to the extra "noise". This is the delta vs RA0045 using csglinux data, and it's noisier on individual measurements:My experiences still align better with the 711, and I dont even mean the different target. The 5128 measures treble peaks which I definetely cannot hear.
Which presets are those? Toward which target?For me personally, the new measurements with the 4620 are nothing less than a milestone!
The presets that were created based on the measurements with the 711 ,never worked properly for me. They were too v-shaped.
The ones that were created based on the 4620 are a revelation. The tonality is finally right.
Less sub-bass, less treble.
I have compared 3 presets so far:
Zero 2 and Blessing 3, and FH3. For all these IEMs, the 4620 preset sounds much more authentic/realistic to me. Through the measurements with the Bruel & Kjaer system, I am rediscovering the world of IEMs.
@crinacle
Thank you so much!
For me personally, the new measurements with the 4620 are nothing less than a milestone!
The presets that were created based on the measurements with the 711 ,never worked properly for me. They were too v-shaped.
The ones that were created based on the 4620 are a revelation. The tonality is finally right.
Less sub-bass, less treble.
I have compared 3 presets so far:
Zero 2, Blessing 3, and FH3. For all these IEMs, the 4620 preset sounds much more authentic/realistic to me. Through the measurements with the Bruel & Kjaer system, I am rediscovering the world of IEMs.
(FH5s wird morgen bei mir ankommen)
@crinacle
Thank you so much!
I have the FH3 and you have me curious. Can you screenshot what EQ you are using?Yes, +1.
My personalized Hamann curve, is very similar to this one.
I have to mention again,how much the FH3,
with the 4620 profile, impressed me!
My beloved Zero 2 didn't stand a chance in terms of technicality.