• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Crazy PA Coaxials for Hifi

Geert

Major Contributor
Joined
Mar 20, 2020
Messages
1,955
Likes
3,570
So, looks like @Juhazi has been quite busy the past few weeks with a crazy PA coax project, and he didn't tell us

That's unacceptable ;)

Interesting project indeed. And I'm not surprised he ran into an issue with interference between the horn and the woofer cone. I said it before, all speakers are a compromise, but PA speakers often prioritize efficiency (loudness) and allow a higher compromise on the level of sound quality. I love coaxials, but they're easier said than done.

rcf-cx12-foam-ring-jpg.1125250
 
OP
voodooless

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,403
Likes
18,363
Location
Netherlands
That's unacceptable ;)
Absolutely :mad:;)
Interesting project indeed. And I'm not surprised he ran into an issue with interference between the horn and the woofer cone.
Nobody should be, it's right there in the datasheet ;) I am however surprised that you can solve the issue mostly with a waveguide extension. That suddenly removes quite a bit of resistance to these horned coaxes.

I'd still like to see a multitone comparison between horned and non-horned coax though. That should show if it's really worth all the trouble. And then there is the narrower directivity: horn coaxes offer generally 50~70 deg, while non-horn coaxes do 80~100 deg. Also due to the larger cone, the non-horn coax can be crossed lower (if the CD can take it).
 

Plcamp

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jul 6, 2020
Messages
860
Likes
1,318
Location
Ottawa
Also due to the larger cone, the non-horn coax can be crossed lower (if the CD can take it).
Crazy idea, but could the horn be smoothly extended to baffle edge with ‘co-entry’ holes in it to support woofer output?
 
OP
voodooless

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,403
Likes
18,363
Location
Netherlands
Crazy idea, but could the horn be smoothly extended to baffle edge with ‘co-entry’ holes in it to support woofer output?
That isn't very crazy. You could just close off the whole woofer by extending the horn, and then making holes in the sides somewhere near the throat. This does have quite a few caveats though:
- The holes will create a bandpass. You won't be able to use the unit in a 2-way anymore unless you can place them strategically in such a wat that it still works out. It's not easy to test this out without destroying the horn.
- The cavity behind the horn is probably too large to make the bandpass holes work properly. You may have to 3D print some filler to make it all fit quite tight.
- The rear chamber generally should be quite small to give the thing the proper bandwidth.

Danley actually did something like that with a smaller BMS coax:
index.php

As you can see, this is also a 3-way horn.
 
Last edited:

Plcamp

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jul 6, 2020
Messages
860
Likes
1,318
Location
Ottawa
Another more crazy idea is the extension of the horn as above, except the extension is done with high frequency absorptive material like felt. If a material were relatively transparent at LF and semi transparent at HF, you might extend tweeter performance to lower frequency while also attenuating problems associated with the gap between horn and woofer cone?

My crazy ideas are not, btw, anticipating using the coax for bass…but if a coax could support 300 hz up, I would be happy.
 
OP
voodooless

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,403
Likes
18,363
Location
Netherlands
Another more crazy idea is the extension of the horn as above, except the extension is done with high frequency absorptive material like felt. If a material were relatively transparent at LF and semi transparent at HF, you might extend tweeter performance to lower frequency while also attenuating problems associated with the gap between horn and woofer cone?

My crazy ideas are not, btw, anticipating using the coax for bass…but if a coax could support 300 hz up, I would be happy.
KEF did something similar:

 
OP
voodooless

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,403
Likes
18,363
Location
Netherlands
Looks like we may have a new contender for the top crown of Crazy PA Coaxials:


1680760303021.png


They will set you back € 809/piece if you buy two. Not to bad if you consider the cost of the coaxial tweeter and the horn alone.
 
Last edited:
OP
voodooless

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,403
Likes
18,363
Location
Netherlands
So this little wonder can be put in a nice reflex 120L box and will do up to 110 dB at 20 Hz with the appropriate tuning. It will need some DSP to flatten the response that way. It will also do 104 dB in a closed box of the same size, will need even more DSP boost, though.

For parties, you'd probably want to opt for some higher tuning, giving you 124 dB at 50 Hz and up from a single speaker :cool:
 

fpitas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 7, 2022
Messages
9,885
Likes
14,212
Location
Northern Virginia, USA
Is the Kef coaxial not in the running here?
 
OP
voodooless

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,403
Likes
18,363
Location
Netherlands
Is the Kef coaxial not in the running here?
I guess that will depend on the criteria ;) It won't win an SPL battle with the B&C monster.

It will however probably be more linear. THD? Who knows... IMD, my guess is the B&C will win.
 

fpitas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 7, 2022
Messages
9,885
Likes
14,212
Location
Northern Virginia, USA

fpitas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 7, 2022
Messages
9,885
Likes
14,212
Location
Northern Virginia, USA
I guess that will depend on the criteria ;) It won't win an SPL battle with the B&C monster.

It will however probably be more linear. THD? Who knows... IMD, my guess is the B&C will win.
Probably true. I'm a fan of politeness in a speaker, but I think I'm at the wrong party for that.
 

Steven Holt

Senior Member
Forum Donor
Joined
May 8, 2022
Messages
442
Likes
570
It will however probably be more linear.
Now I'm curious. Are you saying that there is an inverse relationship between linearity and driver size? Many people claim that the SQ of the Kef Q150 is better than the Q350. Could this be the reason?
 
OP
voodooless

voodooless

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
10,403
Likes
18,363
Location
Netherlands
Now I'm curious. Are you saying that there is an inverse relationship between linearity and driver size? Many people claim that the SQ of the Kef Q150 is better than the Q350. Could this be the reason?
No I’m not. It’s just that we’ve seen the white paper of the KEF 3-way coax, and you can also look at the B&C datasheet. Clearly the KEF is more linear. Driver size has little to do with that. If anything, the horn makes things a lot more difficult. The woofer/horn integration will be quite tricky to get right.

Another thing the B&C is better at: pattern control. The 18” woofer will hold until about 300~400Hz.
 
Last edited:

Plcamp

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jul 6, 2020
Messages
860
Likes
1,318
Location
Ottawa
Can I buy a new KEF coaxial driver anywhere? Or is it only online used ones?
 

fpitas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jul 7, 2022
Messages
9,885
Likes
14,212
Location
Northern Virginia, USA
Can I buy a new KEF coaxial driver anywhere? Or is it only online used ones?
I've seen them sold as ceiling speakers, of all things. Maybe someone can say if they really are the same.
 
Top Bottom