You would first need to define what is a perfect speaker... that's not possible imoAs the question says - could AI take everything we know and do better than a human designer ?
You would first need to define what is a perfect speaker... that's not possible imoAs the question says - could AI take everything we know and do better than a human designer ?
And schools in the UK...I don't see why not, they are already using AI tools to design and build hotels in China...
![]()
‘It’s already way beyond what humans can do’: will AI wipe out architects?
It’s revolutionising building – but could AI kill off an entire profession? Perhaps not, finds our writer, as he enters a world where Corbusier-style marvels and 500-room hotels are just a click awaywww.theguardian.com
Can’t believe we have schools that may collapse without warning - how far we have fallen!And schools in the UK...
![]()
Ministers face calls to explain delay in closing schools over concrete crisis
Labour calls for audit of handling of longstanding safety fears as government pledges to fund repairs expected to cost at least £100mwww.theguardian.com
So, how would you start to define that goalYou would first need to define what is a perfect speaker... that's not possible imo
It would need to be specifically trained. Just pulling from all the information on the internet would likely cause it to come up with some errors. So the results of just asking a current AI to design a speaker would be questionable. When AI is trained they feed it the information and then they give it a large set of questions and rate its answers. It 'learns' from that feedback what answers not to give in the future. At this point if the people rating the answers have a different idea of a 'perfect' speaker then the AI will consider those people's opinion to be fact and it will design your speaker based off their personal thinking. This is the point in the process where AIs develop biases.Why would it be qualified? In essence someone or something has to teach it.
We had plenty of warning, it's the lack of subsequent action that is the problem.Can’t believe we have schools that may collapse without warning - how far we have fallen!
It would need to be specifically trained. Just pulling from all the information on the internet would likely cause it to come up with some errors. So the results of just asking a current AI to design a speaker would be questionable. When AI is trained they feed it the information and then they give it a large set of questions and rate its answers. It 'learns' from that feedback what answers not to give in the future. At this point if the people rating the answers have a different idea of a 'perfect' speaker then the AI will consider those people's opinion to be fact and it will design your speaker based off their personal thinking. This is the point in the process where AIs develop biases.
Here is an example of traditional AI/ML used to design an antenna. As the other posters noted the challenge would be to define how to evaluate 'best', but if we could......I am engineer and work in technology, but I am not an electrical / audio engineer. I actually think I suffer from imposter syndrome in this forum
As the question says - could AI take everything we know and do better than a human designer ?
This isn't strictly true - as @nerdstrike hinted at, AI can randomly generate new "ideas" and simulate their performance, gradually combining and selecting among the best performers. It's an "evolutionary" type of algorithm, not sure if "AI" is the right word for it, though. There are examples of new modes of walking coming from algorithms like this.AI can only interpolate and not extrapolate
Actually, if you just set an optimization algorithm at the task of "Build a speaker that gets a 10.0 preference score" you could probably get pretty far. If the task is "come up with a speaker that I like more than one with a 10.0 preference score" you're going to be spinning wheels forever.Here is an example of traditional AI/ML used to design an antenna. As the other posters noted the challenge would be to define how to evaluate 'best', but if we could......