The 877MG/877BE driver looks exactly like the Radian 951 motor. That's a fantastic motor but the exit angle is unorthodox which imo has contributed to DIYers sometimes getting disappointing results with it.
That sounds great !The key is finding the right partner. My partner and I are working together to design an ADU to house our surround system and theater.
That's a real 1950's statement... how do you know if she isn't the chief bread winner?That sounds great !
Have you approached her yet about getting a job, or second job, to help pay for the ADU ?
Just a thought.![]()
Just kidding you know, sorry but I'm not very 21st century PC. LOLThat's a real 1950's statement...
I don't, but sounds great to me.how do you know if she isn't the chief bread winner?
Yes, I won the relationship lottery.Just kidding you know, sorry but I'm not very 21st century PC. LOL
I don't, but sounds great to me.![]()
It depends on the size, but in general OS waveguides are not particularly good at extending down low. Generalizing a bit, a 15" OSWG is good to about 1 kHz; 18" to about 800 Hz; and 21" to about 650 Hz.
VQ? Nope, all they w\o round-overs.
About Dualconcentric™ drivers, here it is, from sunny Bulgaria:
View attachment 561778
![]()
Do you mean OS in general, or just as used in a typical 2-way implementation? An OS synergy-like design will perform almost the same as a conical one below a couple kHz, assuming equal mouth size and coverage angle(s).
Sure. IIRC, it was reported on Speakerplans that some early production units were fitted with ferrite 4590s Dualconcentric™; for some reason, a sufficient quantity of neo drivers was not foundIs that a rebadged BMS? Sure looks like it.
OS is almost the same as conical except near the throat. It follows then that the acoustic loading is almost the same at low frequencies. Can be confirmed by simulation if you're so inclined.I meant OS in general.
Not any large ones, unfortunately.If you have examples of synergy-like designs built off OS, I'd love to see them.
Hello Duke
Can you elaborate a bit? The original JBL 476's used the coherent wave phase plug the made them "throatless" drivers. Does the Radian use the older conical triangle cross section like a 375?
Thanks Rob![]()
Thank you Duke.
Without a deep understanding of the oblate-spheroid math and resultant contours, I've always kind of guessed the mouth becomes disproportionally large as xover frequency lowers. I think the info you've given supports that idea. Is that how you see it?
Plot twist: she plays subcontrabass tubaSo true. A friend's wife is a musician. His huge horn speakers are fine with her!
Lol! Singer. She likes the voice presentation.Plot twist: she plays subcontrabass tuba
My first ones were the 950s. Just a standard divergent angle. I asked Richard for the exact value; if I recall correctly, it’s 11º+.Radian 951 motor is 13.7 degrees (IIRC) but it is CONVERGING
Did you carefully eyeball the exit of the 950, or just go by the spec sheet?My first ones were the 950s. Just a standard divergent angle. I asked Richard for the exact value; if I recall correctly, it’s 11º+.
I definetly believe. And measured it roughly myself. 950 designed just like any standard driver with a dome phragm. Richard Kontrimas himself (as Radian founder\owner) was a pleasure to deal with. Although I was dissatisfied with the professional competence of Radian girl who filled out the shipping documents in 2010Believe your sighted analysis of the 950's exit angle