• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Component(s) you would induct into a "Hi-Fi Hall of Fame"?

All in all, Technics was probably the greatest producer of phono products: turntables, arms, cartridges.
And I would like to add that such aren't really objectively surpassed even today.
 
Technics SL M3: Is It The Second Best Technics Made? 3rd, maybe? I don't know. But I'm, VERY HAPPY with it for many years, regardless, .
images (1).jpegPhotos from a www.
images (2).jpeg
A linear tracking tonearm -- shades of Rabco, circa 1970!
 
https://audio-database.com/YAMAHA/amp/mx-10000.html
mx-10000.jpg
 
Last edited:
A linear tracking tonearm -- shades of Rabco, circa 1970!
Here is an article about it which talks also about the differences to the Technics design (someone can use the browser to translate it into English)

Technics SL M3: Is It The Second Best Technics Made? 3rd, maybe? I don't know. But I'm, VERY HAPPY with it for many years, regardless, .
From product hierarchy (and drive motor and price) several SP models were above it but those didn't have tangential arms with its advantage and disadvantages, still today a good TT.
 
Here is an article about it which talks also about the differences to the Technics design (someone can use the browser to translate it into English)


From product hierarchy (and drive motor and price) several SP models were above it but those didn't have tangential arms with its advantage and disadvantages, still today a good TT.

I new about the RABCO (in 1970 I was 13 & much more interested in getting ready to hitch hike around Europe (and girls, as I had reached my full adult height & had grown a mustache). I became mildly interested in stereo gear during that trip. By 1974 my interest had become quite high & I started working at radio stations.

The statement about where it was in the HIERACHY of Technics originated here:

"StereoNET Logo

Technics SL M3 Opinions. Is It The Second Best Technics Made?​



t_mike
By t_mike
May 20, 2020 in Turntables, Record Players & Vinyl"

Which is also why I questioned it.

Thanks you for the additional information.
I was well aware that there are models that are higher. (I used to work at Radio stations that had some of them).
Just not what models all of them are.
For me the tangential tone arm & T4P were (and would be today) my main purchase reasons (above & beyond it's other better than most specs).
My unit came from an estate sale in Germany a number of years ago.
I was concieved in Chas, SC. But my mother is Austrian & I was born in Salzburg, Austria. This gives me a chance to see how much of my German skills that I have lost. Thanks.
In the 1980's I worked as a translator for Porsche Cars North America & later as a final inspector on the Cars. I have not used much German since around 1990.
 
Last edited:
All in all, Technics was probably the greatest producer of phono products: turntables, arms, cartridges.
Cartridges? I mean... maybe -- but not who I would think of. They did make (or at least market) a fancy and well-regarded strain-gauge cartridge for a while, if memory serves.
Say more about Technics cartridges, @SIY, if you get a spare moment, and if you're so inclined.
A linear tracking tonearm -- shades of Rabco, circa 1970!
Or Marantz, somewhat earlier. ;)

1740746814328.png
e
source: https://skyfiaudio.com/products/marantz-slt-12-linear-tracking-vintage-turntable

The early tangential arms had rather less sophisticated (and/or no) servo control and were, at best finicky (Rabco) and at worst, regrettable (the above-mentioned marantz). ;)
 
Cartridges?
EPC100C Mk4, EPC205C Mk3, to name two. The former had the lowest moving mass of any commercial cartridge. These cartridges had remarkably flat response, uncritical loading, and excellent trackability. EDIT: I should have included the EPC-305MC and EPC-300MC.

The strain gage carts were branded Panasonic but that's a quibble.
 
Last edited:
Technics SL M3: Is It The Second Best Technics Made? 3rd, maybe? I don't know. But I'm, VERY HAPPY with it for many years, regardless, .
images (1).jpegPhotos from a www.
images (2).jpeg
I've never actually seen one of those in the wild. Bet it's terrific.

But if I were going to sink money into a TT (which I'm not inclined to do at the moment), there is no question it would be one of the SP-10s.
 
EPC100C Mk4, EPC205C Mk3, to name two. The former had the lowest moving mass of any commercial cartridge. These cartridges had remarkably flat response, uncritical loading, and excellent trackability. EDIT: I should have included the EPC-305MC and EPC-300MC.

The strain gage carts were branded Panasonic but that's a quibble.
Panasonic, Technics, National -- It's all Matsushita to me! :)
Thanks -- my familiarity of these is, clearly, extremely limited.

1740748223023.png

1740748246344.png
 
The Klipsch Heresy V1 sold from 1957 to 1984, nearly 30 years, without any updates. That's a long, long run. If we include updates, how many speakers have been around continuously since 1957?
 
I've never actually seen one of those in the wild. Bet it's terrific.

But if I were going to sink money into a TT (which I'm not inclined to do at the moment), there is no question it would be one of the SP-10s.
For those that are not familiar with them, here is a specification sheet from 1986:
Audio Database


SL-M3

  • Technics SL-M3​

  • ¥ 99,800 (around 1986)

Commentary​


A full-auto player with linear tracking system.

It is equipped with a unique linear tracking arm that can make tracking error, which causes distortion during playback, and inside force, which causes channel imbalance, close to 0.
The tracking error angle is within ± 0.05 ° by detecting the arm deflection angle with an optical sensor and obtaining a high-precision detection signal.

The tone arm uses a unique dynamic balance system, and the arm bearing uses a 4-point support system gimbal suspension system.
In addition, the arm has a low mass design with an effective mass of 13g including the cartridge.

Diameter 32.5 cm, Weight 2.5 kg, Inertial Mass 427 kg / cm2Large and heavy aluminum die-cast turntable has been adopted.

Continuously variable pitch adjustment within ± 6% is possible.

Equipped with an electronically controlled full auto mechanism.

Equipped with plug-in connector system MM type cartridge.

TNRC and high-density particle board are used for the cabinet.

  • Gimbal suspension bearing structure

Model Rating​

TypeQuartz DD full auto player system
<Turntable portion>
Drive systemDirect drive
Control systemQuartz control
Number of revolutions33 1/3, 45 rpm
Wow flutter0.022%W.R.M.S(JIS C5521)
0.008% W. R. M. S (Rotating Part Only)
Signal-to-noise ratio82 dB (DIN-B, IEC98A weighted)
Cartridge Section
TypePlug-in connector MM type stereo cartridge
Exchange needleEPS-P205ED4(¥15,000)
<General>
Pwer100 VAC, 50Hz/60Hz
Power consumption22W
External dimensionsWidth 526x Height 202x Depth 426 mm
Weight13.5kg

There were various internal power supplies for different voltages and also a more rare (from what I have been told) switch selectable power supply for USA/Europe (which is on mine).
I typically use NOS SHURE T4P: V15 V-P carts.
Shure VN5P Stylus Specifications
- Output voltage @ 1kHz, 5cm/sec.: 3.2mV
- Channel balance: 1.5dB
- Channel separation @ 1kHz: 25dB
- Frequency response: 10Hz-25kHz
- Stylus type: 0.2 x 0.15 mil nude hyperelliptical, MICROWALL/Be beryllium shank
- Tracking force range: 1.25g
- Color: Light Gray
I have some NOS VN5MR (Essentially the same but has the brush)
But am now looking into the JICO styluses (I have a couple of the 1st ones they issued in my stock)

A NOS Technics P-33 (obtained through Thakker EU)
Technics EPC-P33 Cartridge Specifications
- Type: Moving magnet
- Frequency response: 10-50,000 Hz | 20-10,000 ± 1 db
- Output voltage @ 1kHz, 5 cm/sec: 3.5 mV
- Tracking force: 1.25 ± 0.25 g
- Channel balance @ 1kHz: Within 1.8 dB
- Channel sepration @ 1kHz: 22 dB
- Recommended load impedance: 47-100 kΩ
- Compliance (dynamic): 12 x 10-6 cm/dyne (100Hz)
- Weight: 6 g (cartridge only)
- Replacement stylus: EPS-33ES (elliptical)

And a
Grado Gold 3 P-mount T4P Phono Cartridge Specifications
- Type: Moving magnet
- Output voltage: 5mV
- Frequency response: 10Hz-60kHz
- Load impedance: 47k ohms
- Channel separation: 35dB
- Stylus type: Elliptical
- Stylus replacement: User replaceable
- Compliance: 20mm/N
- Tracking force: 1.0 - 2.0 g
- Recommended tracking force: 1.5 g
- Weight: 5.5 g
 
Panasonic, Technics, National -- It's all Matsushita to me! :)
Thanks -- my familiarity of these is, clearly, extremely limited.

View attachment 432108
View attachment 432109

These are in Japanese, but I think most OSs do the right-click translate thing.


Some random images: https://docs.myhi.fi/docs/imagery/Technics/

Oh - and my favorite tonearm: https://docs.myhi.fi/docs/brochures/Technics/Technics_EPA-500_System.html
 
Back
Top Bottom