Robin L
Master Contributor
Before the Linn Sondek LP 12 was the:
Last edited:
Why? I'm not really picking on your choice, but why? McIntosh amps of the time were better built performed as well were more available, and more powerful. HK Citation amps were also better built imo. So why the 8B instead of one of these other two? I know it has legendary status. Maybe too much of one. Without some guidelines everyone is just picking a personal fave.I vote for the venerable Marantz 8B.
Magnetic tape, good catch: Germans were achieving amazing results with it during WWII.I would say: the tape recorder, the radio, the vinyl record, the reel, the cassette, the CD, streaming.
Everything else is technology that was invented or used to adapt to the formats that contain the message.
It is not second in importance, but without support it would not exist or would not be applied.
As for names of components, well I think there are many that have marked an era. I would say that they have already been widely cited in previous posts!
The 8B was just a Mullard 5-20. Lots and lots of Mullard 5-20s out there with different brands.Why? I'm not really picking on your choice, but why? McIntosh amps of the time were better built performed as well were more available, and more powerful. HK Citation amps were also better built imo. So why the 8B instead of one of these other two? I know it has legendary status. Maybe too much of one. Without some guidelines everyone is just picking a personal fave.
Yup. To this very day, there is nothing -- including subsequent Yamaha processors -- that matches its versatility, especially when teamed with a DSR-100 Pro and it's motorized seven-gang master volume control.I would put the Yamaha DSP-1 up there.
More like two of them with lots of "bells & whistles" -- and, if you believe the published specs, a good deal more power (beefier power supply?).The 8B was just a Mullard 5-20. Lots and lots of Mullard 5-20s out there with different brands.
I mentioned the Sony TA-N88 because it was the first viable commercial Class D amp.Surprised no one has listed a class D amp or maybe they did.
The 8B has such a polite look about it, and like a good bird dog, it never put any tooth holes in the music. I sometimes genuflect in front of mine. The copy I have, I bought used and it was not working. I found that the power transformer (xfmr) was burnt out. Some previous owner thought that the more capacitance in the B+ supply, the better, so he gooped on over 2,000uF worth of it and toasted the poor power transformer with those horrendous peak current spikes. I specified a replacement transformer in a toroidal, rather than E-I type, and got the amp going again, using reasonable amounts of capacitance. I de-potted the original xfmr. I placed it in my kitchen oven set to 450 degrees F and melted the potting material so that I could remove the dead xfmr. I made a mounting bracket structure to support the toroidal xfmr in the original mounting base of the can that held the original xfmr. The new xfmr barely gets warm so I had no need to pot it; the xfmr just sits on the base of the pot with the top part of the can not reinstalled, to allow heat escape. The amp works fine, and has a couple of watts more power per channel due to the stiffer supply voltage afforded by the new xfmr. I also have a pair of McIntosh MC-30 power amps, and those needed nothing other than standard restoration; i.e. cleanup, new 'lytics, and any other small components that needed replacement. I bought a replacement twist prong mount can made by CP Manufacturing, model C-EC80-40-30-20, all at 525Vdc, and made in the USA. It's the same physical size & shape as the original, and fits exactly in its place. I enjoyed restoring both amps to original performance, and listen to both of them every so often. My main amps are a pair of tube type home-brewed circlotron type of design with an output transformer that a friend and I developed and have patented. What's patented on it is the way it's wound.Why? I'm not really picking on your choice, but why? McIntosh amps of the time were better built performed as well were more available, and more powerful. HK Citation amps were also better built imo. So why the 8B instead of one of these other two? I know it has legendary status. Maybe too much of one. Without some guidelines everyone is just picking a personal fave.
Those are pieces of jewelry disguised as tape recorders.
Owned one. Was not impressed. Liked the Scott 299B more. Don't think of that as a hall of fame piece of gear either. As far as I'm concerned, the audio HOF pieces have to be revolutionary, the Marantz 8B was evolutionary.Why? I'm not really picking on your choice, but why? McIntosh amps of the time were better built performed as well were more available, and more powerful. HK Citation amps were also better built imo. So why the 8B instead of one of these other two? I know it has legendary status. Maybe too much of one. Without some guidelines everyone is just picking a personal fave.