If it's on the list because it's success caused more people to be interested in playing audio at home, then I'm good with that.The wretched little NAD-3020 gets in because it is the most successful amplifier ever.
I had to add the back side, as the available connections were/are important (2 main outs, a processor loop, load capacitance and resistance selections for MM cartridges, a MC circuit customized to your specific MC cart, infrasonic filterThis (incorporating much foundational thinking quickly cribbed by others):
View attachment 430313
I'LL second throwing that one on the list.Has anyone listed the Crown DC300 amp, a monster of an amp in the early 70s with excellent performance at the time.
The Ohm model F was also an omnidirectional radiator.I was going to say that at only 61 years old I’m too young for this conversation and I’d let you more knowledgable old fogies hash this out
But actually, I’m going to throw in a nomination:
MBL 101 Radialstrahler:
![]()
Maybe not the first or only attempt at an Omni directional speaker, but one of the most original and successful attempts which I think others at this point would have to be judged against. They’ve become iconic, and for decades have been one of the “ must hear” rooms at audio shows.
Compared to the MBL 101 Radialstrahler, the OHM F was a sort of omnidirectional radiator (they were closer when a second pair mounted inverted on top of the first pair, however).The Ohm model F was also an omnidirectional radiator.
The NAD 3020 really sounds nice though. Good mention.If it's on the list because it's success caused more people to be interested in playing audio at home, then I'm good with that.
I'm not good with "it was a most wonderful component devised up to that time".
And the beam power tube, which was in the beginning just a way around the pentode patentAltec Duplex
Quad ESL-57
Klipschorn
Acoustic Research AR-3
harman/kardon first integrated receiver (cannot remember model number ATM)
The pentode
Columbia LP records
Mono-compatible stereo (all formats, including FM MPX)
Ultralinear output stage
No argument from me! I'd use 288s myself, but I can't justify the cost of a nice pair.As a horn guy I'm obliged to mention the Altec 288 driver in its various guises. It still makes "Best sounding compression driver" lists to this day. And the various TAD compression drivers, which were the offspring of Altec and JBL driver tech taken to extremes by Bart Locanthi.
I'd recommend my TAD TD-2002s, but you might not like the price of those, eitherNo argument from me! I'd use 288s myself, but I can't justify the cost of a nice pair.![]()
You are correct, sir!I'd recommend my TAD TD-2002s, but you might not like the price of those, either![]()
The price is right! I determined to never need another horn driver again.You are correct, sir!
I got a very good deal on my 802Ds and the JBL 2441s I have were essentially given to me.![]()
The thing had no right to sound as good as it did, though.If it's on the list because it's success caused more people to be interested in playing audio at home, then I'm good with that.
I'm not good with "it was a most wonderful component devised up to that time".